FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

5/24/2017 5:18 PM  #1


70 351W

There is a boat load of headers that fit, which ones are the best and longest lasting?


70, ragtop 351W/416 stroker Edel Performer heads w pro flow 4, Comp roller 35-421-8. T5
 

5/24/2017 5:33 PM  #2


Re: 70 351W

JBA stainless ceramic coated shorties. Fit great, you can get to most port bolts with a socket, and they have ball/socket collectors, so no collector gaskets are used.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 

5/24/2017 8:10 PM  #3


Re: 70 351W

What year is your car?  1970?  Virtually any of the major mfgs' headers will work.  JBA's are one of the best.

I have Heddman shorties on  my '66 w/70 351w.  Much better than long tubes  Long tubes give much less room around sensitive things like starters, steering, etc.  Heat is a problem too.  You might have problems with the long tubes hanging too low and scraping the ground on humps.  particularly if it is lowered.  Spark plug accessability is an issue too.  The guys here can help you out there.  And with shorties there is very little hp loss until you rev the engine real high.


Original owner - 351w,T-5, 4whl disks, power R&P
 

5/26/2017 8:15 PM  #4


Re: 70 351W

I have the same as MS - the JBA coated shorty headers on my 351W. Great fit and much easier to install than the old Heddman long tube ones I had before.


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

5/26/2017 9:34 PM  #5


Re: 70 351W

Part numbers and vehicle info would be great. Auto,5 spd, air,ps, pb stock steering or rack and pinion? are they for a certain year vehicle only or 65-73? Just a few questions that may apply.
​Sorry guys but there are so many variables that this could be a what do you have and what fits topic.
 

 

5/27/2017 6:35 AM  #6


Re: 70 351W

Been looking into the JBA's. My car is a 1970 convertable I currently have Hedman long tubes that I've been running for about 37 years. I took them off the 302 with a 3 speed and put them on the 351 with a C4 but they don't fit as good and they are beginning to rust out. JBA shorties seem to be the best recommendation. That is also what the exhaust pipe guy recommended. I was hoping to patch it but he say's the current job is too junky. I just didn't want to spend the money. So if I'm going to do it all what is best X pipe or H pipe? I might not have a choice. I'm not sure a X pipe will fit,


70, ragtop 351W/416 stroker Edel Performer heads w pro flow 4, Comp roller 35-421-8. T5
     Thread Starter
 

5/27/2017 7:04 AM  #7


Re: 70 351W

An X pipe has smoother flow, and in theory helps with power, but my guess is that on a typical street engine there's little if any observable difference. 

 

5/27/2017 7:37 PM  #8


Re: 70 351W

It will "kill-off" some of the rumpity-rump tone of your "high-dollar" camshaft too..................if that's important.
6s6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

5/28/2017 2:33 PM  #9


Re: 70 351W

That's true too.  If you want rumpity just forgo the crossover.  My car doesn't have one and it sounds like its got a bit of a cam to it even though its just a stock A code 289. 

 

5/29/2017 7:30 PM  #10


Re: 70 351W

My main reason for X or H pipe is to stabilize the exhaust system. It keeps the system from rocking back and forth, pivoting on the gaskets between the header and the head. The gaskets will last alot longer if the two exhaust pipes are welded together, whether with a flow tube or even a piece of angle iron.

If it also improves sound or increases power, so much the better.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 

5/29/2017 9:12 PM  #11


Re: 70 351W

I have an H pipe on it now and it is holding the system stable. I've read that an X pipe makes more power but with my set up I think that is negligible except that I like the idea of removing the "rumpity". IMO the "rum pity" is a Chevy thing. I just don't know if the X pipe will work in a convertable because the chassis stiffener plate might be in the way.


70, ragtop 351W/416 stroker Edel Performer heads w pro flow 4, Comp roller 35-421-8. T5
     Thread Starter
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.