| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I think I just had my brake light pressure switch fail on me. It has to be what's failed as the taillights still light up when I turn them on and they are the LED type.
Anyway, is this something that commonly fails? I only got a few years out of this one.
Offline
Do the turn signals still work? If so, it may be the pressure switch. If not, check the turn signal switch.
Offline
You DON'T have the manual brake switch attached to the brake pedal?!! (stock configuration)
6sal6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
You DON'T have the manual brake switch attached to the brake pedal?!! (stock configuration)
6sal6
Sal, the 64-1/2 had a pressure switch on the master cylinder instead of a mechanical switch on the pedal pin.
Offline
It was definitely the brake light pressure switch (that connects to the master cylinder on my car). I replaced it with a (made in the USA) Fuelmiser brand.
I do hope this one lasts me a while.
Interesting to note that Ford changed the design in 1965 to a switch mounted under the dash. Does this mean that the master cylinder type are not that great?
Last edited by Toploader (9/03/2021 12:38 AM)
Offline
Ford must have had a reason. Quality? Failure prone? New switch cheaper? New location easier to assemble car? New location less failure prone?
I'd just revisit these thoughts if your new switch goes out on you.
Offline
Rufus68 wrote:
Ford must have had a reason. Quality? Failure prone? New switch cheaper? New location easier to assemble car? New location less failure prone?
I'd just revisit these thoughts if your new switch goes out on you.
Faster activation of the stop lights.
Offline
I would think that extra foot of coper wire cost Ford a bunch of money over 500,000 cars. They only make decisions based on one thing. How much cost can I shave off and stick in my pocket?
My thinking is a pressure switch is quicker to activate than one that relies on pedal movement.
Offline
I'm hoping the Fuelmiser switch lasts a good while. There was a Scott Drake switch available, but I shuddered at that thought.
Offline
MS wrote:
I would think that extra foot of coper wire cost Ford a bunch of money over 500,000 cars. They only make decisions based on one thing. How much cost can I shave off and stick in my pocket?
My thinking is a pressure switch is quicker to activate than one that relies on pedal movement.
I think it is the opposite.
The brake light switch will turn the brake lights on with just a light touch of the pedal long before any line pressure is generated by hydraulics.
The brake light switches on 67-68 are very sensitive and if not installed with the proper bushings and washers they will not work properly.
Disk, drum, manual and power switches are all different
Offline
Toploader wrote:
It was definitely the brake light pressure switch (that connects to the master cylinder on my car). I replaced it with a (made in the USA) Fuelmiser brand.
I do hope this one lasts me a while.
Interesting to note that Ford changed the design in 1965 to a switch mounted under the dash. Does this mean that the master cylinder type are not that great?
Many years ago, I had an early 60's Falcon, the pressure switch failed, I found out when someone rear ended me and yelled at me because the brake lights didn't work!
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |