| ||
| Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
After shelby drop and cutting a coil off the springs I noticed the sway bar is hanging very low . Should I shorten the end links to restore a more normal height?
also finished instalation of floor pans. Still need to paint.


Offline
ok, someone educate me here. I wouldn't think that lowering the upper arm and cutting coils has any effect on the anti sway bar position. why would that be the case? It's attached to the lower arm, right?
Just trying to learn. Thanks.
Offline

Its on upside down
Offline

Shortening the link spacers will do the trick. Be sure to use grade 8 bolts (you'll probably need shorter ones). My car looks to be about the same height as yours and my end link spacers are probably about half the length of what I see in your pics. With the longer links the sway bar may also contact the frame before full bump stop in a worst case scenario.
Novi Rick, lowering the car means the lower arms sit 'higher' in relation to the chassis so the front of the sway bar will move down with standard length spacers in place, the frame bushings being the pivot point.
Last edited by McStang (7/23/2013 6:57 PM)
Offline
My first thought was , could it be upside down. I will try fliping it tomorrow.
Offline

Steve-G wrote:
My first thought was , could it be upside down. I will try fliping it tomorrow.
It's not on upside down.
Offline

If you shorten the links from stock length, you may screw up the geometry of the bar. My car was lowered 2" and I do not recall the bar being a problem. Just think of it as an early warning system against oil pan damage.
Obviously if the car is lowered, the lower control arms sit higher in the chassis, so the front of the bar will sit lower.
Offline
So as the car chassis is lowered, the sway bar rotates in the frame bushings, with the end result being the front / center part of the bar sits lower as it rotates. Got it. Thanks. I wasn't thinking of the whole bar, only the end links.
Does this put added stress on the end links or bar? How is the ride affected?
Offline

And, like McStang said... Your end links look like they are about twice as long as the stockers. The tube on a stocker is under 3" long.
Offline

I had to shorten the end link spacers and bolts on mine - running a big 1 1/4" (hollow) bar that definitely had clearance problems at my ride height (about as low as it will go) with stock length spacers - modified spacers are about 1 3/4" IIRC.
As far as shortening the spacers and messing up the bar geometry goes I really don't think this is a concern. As long as the end links are the same length on each side the bar will work fine. All the really low cars I've seen at track days have shortened end links and I haven't experienced anything 'funny' with mine - it sticks like gorilla snot with the current setup and tires with no funky behaviour over rough tarmac or when whipping around tight corners as fast as I can get it to go which is pretty quick ('66 Coupe). I'm also running Baer Trackers to correct bumpsteer, setup with a homebrew gauge, which is pretty much non-existant.
Offline
Checked the sway bay and it's not upside down. I dont think you could put it in upside down. Pulled the end links off pulled the bar down to a more normal looking position and it looks like shorting the end links about 1" will work.
| REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |