| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
What factory exhaust manifolds can be used on a 65 w/289-302?
What about 351w?
Stock 65-66
Hipo
Any others?
Last edited by Nos681 (9/15/2020 8:48 PM)
Offline
I think these were on "some" FoMoCo models back-in-the-day! Flowed pretty durn good fer factory IF I recall co-wreckly! (pun intended!)
Last edited by 6sally6 (9/15/2020 9:31 PM)
Offline
These were for a "space-limited" application. Pretty sure FoMoCo stuff!
You sir are................Very Welcome!!
6sal6
Last edited by 6sally6 (9/15/2020 9:35 PM)
Offline
Nos681 wrote:
What factory exhaust manifolds can be used on a 65 w/289-302?
What about 351w?
Stock 65-66
Hipo
Any others?
I believe the Shelbys came with a 4-into-2-into-1 tubular exhaust manifold. Anyway, they were around early on.
As to a 351w, only a tubular manifold will work. Stock 351w's had huge manifolds. no way would they fit in a 65-66
Offline
351w for Mustang chassis, 289 and 302, for Mustang chassis. I have put 351w with stock Mustang 1969-70 manifolds in a 65.
289 hipo manifolds fit in 65 but with use of 66 motor mounts.
Offline
MS wrote:
351w for Mustang chassis, 289 and 302, for Mustang chassis. I have put 351w with stock Mustang 1969-70 manifolds in a 65.
289 hipo manifolds fit in 65 but with use of 66 motor mounts.
This type of information is not mentioned very often if ever.
Answers usually go straight to headers.
Any idea about late model manifolds that come on trucks and earlier crown vics?
Offline
Offline
MS wrote:
351w for Mustang chassis, 289 and 302, for Mustang chassis. I have put 351w with stock Mustang 1969-70 manifolds in a 65.
289 hipo manifolds fit in 65 but with use of 66 motor mounts.
That's amazing! I must have seen the wrong years' manifold. They weighed 20-30 lb each and would not fit in my car at all. I measured, too. Or did you put 65-66 manifolds in? I'm unclear.
Offline
lowercasesteve wrote:
MS wrote:
351w for Mustang chassis, 289 and 302, for Mustang chassis. I have put 351w with stock Mustang 1969-70 manifolds in a 65.
289 hipo manifolds fit in 65 but with use of 66 motor mounts.That's amazing! I must have seen the wrong years' manifold. They weighed 20-30 lb each and would not fit in my car at all. I measured, too. Or did you put 65-66 manifolds in? I'm unclear.
I can understand same manifold to respective engine in mustang chassis.
Will the Hipo’s fit 351 in mustang chassis?
Offline
Non-Mustang manifolds typically angle outward at the collector where the Mustang manifolds angle downward. So the Galaxy and truck have issues, although I have not tried every manifold.
351w came out in 1969.. the 69-70 manifolds do fit either the small block 289 or 302 or the 351w In a Mustang chassis.
Offline
Will Hipo’s fit 351w in 65 mustang?
Offline
Nos681 wrote:
Will Hipo’s fit 351w in 65 mustang?
I would assume IF they fit a 289HP in a Mustang ......you would be golden with a 260-289-302-5.0-351W mill. (note the use of "really hip" term when describing an engine!!)
6s6
Last edited by 6sally6 (9/18/2020 7:38 PM)
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Nos681 wrote:
Will Hipo’s fit 351w in 65 mustang?
I would assume IF they fit a 289HP in a Mustang ......you would be golden with a 260-289-302-5.0-351W-351C mill. (note the use of "really hip" term when describing an engine!!)
6s6
Bad assumption on the 351c. Those for sure are not going to fit ANY Cleveland in ANY vehicle.
I am not 100% sure about the 351w using hipo manifolds In a 65-66, as I have not done it myself. They would be more restrictive than stock 69-70 351w manifolds, anyway.
Offline
lowercasesteve wrote:
MS wrote:
351w for Mustang chassis, 289 and 302, for Mustang chassis. I have put 351w with stock Mustang 1969-70 manifolds in a 65.
289 hipo manifolds fit in 65 but with use of 66 motor mounts.That's amazing! I must have seen the wrong years' manifold. They weighed 20-30 lb each and would not fit in my car at all. I measured, too. Or did you put 65-66 manifolds in? I'm unclear.
What I remember is something like this. Would not fit in mine.
Offline
Years ago, on a friend's 65 Mustang w/351W, we re-installed the 289 stock exhaust manifolds until he could afford headers. Had to grind off the small "nabs" on the manifolds to clear the stock towers. As the 351W sits higher, we also did some manipulation to fit the exhaust piping from the manifolds.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |