| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
Sometimes Mustang guys want to find a whole rear end to swap under their Mustang.
65-66's are pretty narrow compared to other FoMoCo stuff. 57-59 Ford Station wagons...with the faux wood paneling preferably !).
No surprise butt...... that 67 years ago!!
How about other makes and models of narrow a$$ cars ?
Welp (thx RPM)...looky watt-eye came across!
MoPar and Shivel-lay rear ends that could work. (especially the MoPar because of the bolt pattern)
6s6
Welp(thxRPM).......looks like it won't upload !
sorry
6s6
Last edited by 6sally6 (1/22/2023 1:32 PM)
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Sometimes Mustang guys want to find a whole rear end to swap under their Mustang.
65-66's are pretty narrow compared to other FoMoCo stuff. 57-59 Ford Station wagons...with the faux wood paneling preferably !).
No surprise butt...... that 67 years ago!!
How about other makes and models of narrow a$$ cars ?
Welp (thx RPM)...looky watt-eye came across!
MoPar and Shivel-lay rear ends that could work. (especially the MoPar because of the bolt pattern)
6s6
Need to see this before I order the third member from Quick Performance
Welp(thxRPM).......looks like it won't upload !
sorry
6s6
Offline
I have a maverick/comet rearend as a spare but, I may just sell it since I have the 65 rear already looking so good in the car with the rear GT S197 Disc brakes on it already.
Last edited by BILLY WALTON from GEORGIA (1/22/2023 2:20 PM)
Offline
Hey Sal, don’t take everything you see as gospel.
Measure to verify.
I have seen this difference many times in charts that people just copy and paste.
The 71-73 Mustang/Cougar 9” I have measures at 55-13/16” bare housing (60-13/16” wheel flange-wheel flange). Axle code WES-T I was the first to take it apart…mid 90’s.
This is the 65 8” in my car.
Offline
I think there's a lot more to it than just width. Some things I noted are that some of the Chevy rears use a link style rear suspension so you will have multiple brackets to cut off and leaf spring pads to weld on. If you can do all that narrowing a rear isn't that big a deal, especially when at least one forum member has the alignment jig.
If looking at something like a Chevy 8.5" 10 bolt or 12 bolt you'd be better off with a Ford 8.8. Its just as strong, and also keeps the same wheel bolt pattern if its from a 5 lug vehicle.
On the Mopar I wouldn't bother with anything less than an 8-3/4, and even then you'd be just as strong with an 8.8 Ford.
Cost on parts for a Ford 9" or 8.8" are also going to be cheaper than any other rear. Brake options are also plentiful and relatively cheap.
Offline
My story …
I personally pulled the 9” rear out of a 59 Ford passenger car (in a wrecking yard) for my Mustang and found the axle flange to axle flange width to 57.875”, not 57.25”. While this was not the first time I had pulled a 9’ rear out of a 57-59 Ford, it was the first time I found the width to be slightly wider. Somewhere along the line I did find that the 58-60 Thunderbird rear end was 57.875” wide. I’m guessing that somewhere along the assembly line one was substituted for the other.
Offline
Or possibly a rear was swapped before the wreck ended up in the junkyard. You've always got to be careful with stuff in a junkyard. By the time I car gets there usually people have done everything they thought they could to keep it on the road for a reasonable cost.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
Or possibly a rear was swapped before the wreck ended up in the junkyard. You've always got to be careful with stuff in a junkyard. By the time I car gets there usually people have done everything they thought they could to keep it on the road for a reasonable cost.
TKO - I agree this could have been the case, but this car was just an old 4-dr sedan, not wrecked, not modified, etc, etc. I removed it the mid 80's and I'm not sure how long the car was sitting in this "old Time" junk yard. Anyway, there could be several reasons for the 'found' condition.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |