| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
1 of 1
Offline
I know it was discussed a while back.
Offline
No…KISS principle.
Offline
For the way these cars are used I don't see the benefit, and as Nos681 said: it would just add complexity.
Offline
was just wondering if anyone was running one to keep oil out of intake. I know a good baffle system will too.
Offline
Steve Buzik does/did when he had Glen's motor in it.
Offline
rpm wrote:
Steve Buzik does/did when he had Glen's motor in it.
I guess when he had the Paxton on it.
Offline
BILLY WALTON from GEORGIA wrote:
rpm wrote:
Steve Buzik does/did when he had Glen's motor in it.
I guess when he had the Paxton on it.
Offline
Oh, commonly called a "catch can" in turbo circles. IMO without forced induction these are not necessary.
Offline
I might consider a catch can.
First thought was fuel/water separator.
Still, keep it simple.
Carb tuning makes a big difference too.
Last edited by Nos681 (4/04/2025 6:53 AM)
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
Oh, commonly called a "catch can" in turbo circles. IMO without forced induction these are not necessary.
Forced induction cars ain't the only ones with blowby.
Offline
I just remember him having that paxton on it when I saw it.
Offline
rpm wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
Oh, commonly called a "catch can" in turbo circles. IMO without forced induction these are not necessary.
Forced induction cars ain't the only ones with blowby.
If you've got enough blow by in an NA engine to need a catch can either something is wrong or the engine needs a vacuum pump to seal the rings properly. Yes, every engine has some amount of blowby, but I've never seen it become an issue in a NA engine. In forced induction engines its always an issue. Baffles, etc. are designed to work with gravity on your side. When you introduce pressure into the equation it easily overwhelms measures. The problem I've found is that the pressure doesn't build in a linear fashion with a turbo, its slow until the turbo spools, and then it spikes. NA engines are a lot more linear.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
rpm wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
Oh, commonly called a "catch can" in turbo circles. IMO without forced induction these are not necessary.
Forced induction cars ain't the only ones with blowby.Yes, every engine has some amount of blowby, but I've never seen it become an issue in a NA engine.
Come to a Bash, you'll see more than one.
Offline
rpm wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
rpm wrote:
Forced induction cars ain't the only ones with blowby.Yes, every engine has some amount of blowby, but I've never seen it become an issue in a NA engine.
Come to a Bash, you'll see more than one.
Bunch of worn out engines with blowby? Not really selling me on the idea rpm.
Offline
How did you go from more than one to a bunch?
Offline
rpm wrote:
How did you go from more than one to a bunch?
I took the overall quiet from other members to mean they knew we were talking about them, but that they were ashamed to own it, and made an intuitive leap.
Offline
Na, there's just a couple of us who don't know how to build a motor.
Offline
rpm wrote:
Na, there's just a couple of us who don't know how to build a motor.
I am one of them.
Offline
I use one on my /14 v6. I catches a goodly amount
1 of 1
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |