FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Today 9:58 AM  #1


Carbcheater

Having read several posts on this forum regarding the Carbcheater and visiting the website, I am thinking about installing the kit on my 66. The 363 is in and running, but there is a lot of tuning needed. Timing, carburetion, etc. I am not computer savvy, but am particularly interested in the data logging capabilities of the kit, particularly air fuel ratios at different engine loads and rpm. Usually, I sort out carburetion on the dyno, but with data logging of real time driving, I might be able to better tune the engine, thereby minimizing dyno time. I will not be using the spacer offered by Carbcheater. I would appreciate reviews from those using the Carbcheater.

 

Today 11:14 AM  #2


Re: Carbcheater

The only thing I can add to my high praise for the Carb Cheater is to make sure you attach the 12v positive and negative leads directly to the battery posts. Curious why you will not be using the CC spacer. Besides having the two needed vacuum ports, it doubles as an excellent insulator for the carburetor. I milled mine to ~½" for space requirements. This video will get your carb settings properly set.

https://youtu.be/GxeZkULhFLs?is=f6iprlWWBVLQFvKQ


Bob. 21.5 freeway MPG 69 Mach 1, 5.0 GT40P heads, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC
 

Today 12:08 PM  #3


Re: Carbcheater

rpm wrote:

The only thing I can add to my high praise for the Carb Cheater is to make sure you attach the 12v positive and negative leads directly to the battery posts. Curious why you will not be using the CC spacer. Besides having the two needed vacuum ports, it doubles as an excellent insulator for the carburetor. I milled mine to ~½" for space requirements. This video will get your carb settings properly set.

https://youtu.be/GxeZkULhFLs?is=f6iprlWWBVLQFvKQ

Thank you for the information and review. Based on my reading (I have no practical experience with this product), I understand that the CC spacer will restrict or admit atmospheric air into the intake manifold without passing through the carburetor venturis. Until I fully tune the engine, I don't want to add any additional variables into the tuning process. Regarding manifold/carburetor heat transfer, my experience with the open plenum high rise manifolds is that heat transfer, at the ambient temperatures where I typically drive, won't significantly impact performance. This was true on the 347, but not verified on the 363. Thanks again.

Last edited by boss347convertible (Today 12:22 PM)

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.