| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I am contemplating which route would be the least difficult with installing my 94-95 t5z. I basically just have the tranny and a t5 conversion cross member (not sure if it's designed for a fox body t5 or the longer 94-95). Some other things to consider is my 289 has tri-y's.
So should I stick to the longer input shaft and get the correct bell housing and use the longer 94-95 cable clutch?
Or should I change out to a short input shaft with correct bell housing and still use the longer cable clutch and will that allow it to clear the tri-y's?
I would also consider doing a hydraulic clutch if it would make things go together easier with the tri-y's.
Offline
Maybe my cross member has enough adjustment in it to work with either input shaft?
Offline
If your 67 has power steering, stay away from the 94-95 T5 bellhousing. The release arm puts the cable right into the P/S ram. My preference is always the 93 or earlier tranny due to the shorter input shaft.
The Tri-Y headers usually interfere with the cable right where it enters the bellhousing. I have not had any reports of ANY that did not have issues.
Offline
MustangSteve wrote:
If your 67 has power steering, stay away from the 94-95 T5 bellhousing. The release arm puts the cable right into the P/S ram. My preference is always the 93 or earlier tranny due to the shorter input shaft.
The Tri-Y headers usually interfere with the cable right where it enters the bellhousing. I have not had any reports of ANY that did not have issues.
Thanks Steve,
I don't have power steering, so that won't be an issue. I'm thinking about mocking up the motor/tranny in the car with the longer input shaft and then tackling any little issues I may run into. I've read the 94-95 fits the shifter hole better with my factory console. I'm not married to the tri-y's so that's no big deal either.
What would be a good recommendation on a set of shorty headers? Hedmann?
Offline
94/95 never came with a z spec, nor did the aftermarket make an input shaft to use a z spec in a 94/95...if its truly a z spec trans, u r stuck anyhow with the shorter input...longer and shorter input shafts are only interchangeable with the oem 335 first gear t5s that came in factory vehicles...
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |