FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

6/22/2015 9:16 AM  #1


Distributor vacuum advance question

On a 1969 302 which vacuum source is reccomended for the distributor advance, ported like holley says, or manifold?


1969 Fastback Owned 48 years second owner!
 

6/22/2015 9:28 AM  #2


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

Well....if its a basically stock engine...ported. On the other hand...if it has a lumpy to semi-lumpy camshaft...  manifold vacuum usually make it idle cleaner(with appropriate re-curved advance in distrib)
Never a simply yes or no answer!
6s6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

6/22/2015 2:33 PM  #3


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

Black Jade wrote:

On a 1969 302 which vacuum source is reccomended for the distributor advance, ported like holley says, or manifold?

Ported...jj


"Never put a question mark where God put a period "  Richard Petty
 

6/22/2015 8:08 PM  #4


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

I don't know about whether ported or manifold vacuum was used on 68 Mustangs, but I think you will probably be happier with manifold vacuum, which results in max vacuum at idle and then drops of as the throttle is opened.  This generally provides better fuel economy and drivability at part throttle operation (basically what's happening when you drive around town).  Ported vacuum has little to no vacuum at idle and reaches a max value just after the throttle is opened, tapering off from there.  In fact, ported and manifold vacuum are both essentially equal except at idle.  Here's a good article about ignition timing and the ported vs manifold issue:
http://www.gofastforless.com/ignition/advance.htm 
That leaves one more issue - how do you know whether you're using ported or manifold vacuum?  If the source of the vacuum comes from above the throttle then it's ported.

Last edited by jkordzi (6/22/2015 9:33 PM)


Cheap, Fast, Good:  Pick Any Two
 

6/22/2015 10:03 PM  #5


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

So if I switch from ported to manifold my idle should go up immediately. And then readjust timing?

 

6/23/2015 5:29 AM  #6


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

13james13 wrote:

So if I switch from ported to manifold my idle should go up immediately. And then readjust timing?

Kinda sorta.  I think you start with the your goal for total timing and work back from there.  So recurve your distributor, then set initial timing, then adjust your vacuum advance.
 


Cheap, Fast, Good:  Pick Any Two
 

6/23/2015 5:36 AM  #7


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

jkordzi wrote:

13james13 wrote:

So if I switch from ported to manifold my idle should go up immediately. And then readjust timing?

Kinda sorta.  I think you start with the your goal for total timing and work back from there.  So recurve your distributor, then set initial timing, then adjust your vacuum advance.
 

Ok thanks, just looking at different options.

Last edited by 13james13 (6/23/2015 5:37 AM)

 

6/23/2015 5:22 PM  #8


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

I have tried it  both ways...no harm in trying it both ways...I noticed a poorer idle with a direct hook up...went back  to a ported set up,my engine was happier that way.........jj


"Never put a question mark where God put a period "  Richard Petty
 

6/24/2015 7:01 AM  #9


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

On my 68 with factory air, the ported vacuum runs to a 'thermal vacuum switch' , then to the distributor. This is so the engine, if left idling, begins to overheat, it switches the ported vacuum to full vacuum which boosts engine speed and increases cooling from the engine's fan. Now, I don't know if the 69 had this feature, but 'thermal vacuum switch' will get you some pictures of it.

 

6/24/2015 7:17 PM  #10


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

ChrisH IA wrote:

On my 68 with factory air, the ported vacuum runs to a 'thermal vacuum switch' , then to the distributor. This is so the engine, if left idling, begins to overheat, it switches the ported vacuum to full vacuum which boosts engine speed and increases cooling from the engine's fan. Now, I don't know if the 69 had this feature, but 'thermal vacuum switch' will get you some pictures of it.

There's a Ford SHop Tips that explains this:  http://www.mustangtek.com/Library6/ShopTips9-11.html
 


Cheap, Fast, Good:  Pick Any Two
 

6/24/2015 10:44 PM  #11


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

I read a lot on this and there is this well known write - up around about this that makes a definitive statement that manifold vacuum is the way to go.  A lot of people think it's gospel and it's quoted everywhere.

I say bull.  Why do you need additional advance at idle?  I don't see any advantage. I did discover a big disadvantage though.

I was having trouble where the car would drop idle speed very quickly,  and even stall if I let it, when idling and turning the steering wheel or pushing the hydroboost brake.  It made for problems when off the gas while braking and turning a corner,  or parking.

Tried a lot of things to fix it, but it was just weird. The problem turned out to be manifold vacuum advance.  Although it seemed like I had a good strong 800 rpm idle in neutral or with the clutch in,  it was what I guess I would term a "weak" idle.  My theory is that timing was so advanced at idle that it couldn't handle any load from the steering pump, because it was firing so early it was fighting itself similar to how too much initial timing makes for hard starts.

I moved to ported timing,  and now the idle doesn't drop at all when steering pump is working.  Not at all.  I can move it back to manifold,  adjust it to 800 and it will stall under steering pump load,  and move it back to ported and reset idle to 800 and it has no problem with steering pump load.  Easily repeatable.

This also might help folks with automatics whose idle drops too much when put in drive.

So,  my vote is ported because manifold is all con and no pro I can figure out.

Bob

Last edited by rbtconsultants (6/24/2015 10:51 PM)

 

6/26/2015 3:06 PM  #12


Re: Distributor vacuum advance question

This makes sense to me. Thanks for confirming this, Bob.

 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.