FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

9/14/2016 3:30 PM  #26


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Well, somewhat incomplete really.  Gear spread is also important in drag racing because you want to shift into peak torque to maximize acceleration.  When you shift and the engine RPM drops too much you lose time as the engine has to reaccelerate back to peak torque.  Ideally you want the RPM drop on each gear change to be the same.  This was another weakness of the stock Mustang T5 addressed in the Z spec trans.  They tailored all the gear ratios, not just first, and the Z spec ratios are better for all performance applications. 

Also, tire height plays a role in highway RPM because a taller tire effectively lowers the rear gear ratio. 

But, I would never suggest a gear ratio below a 3.55 in a T5 combo.  I know some people like those lower (numerically) rear gears, but I wouldn't go below 3.55.  I think 3.73s are a great all around gear ratio if you have an engine that will rev.  Once we get away from stock type 302s and 289s that only want to rev to like 5,500RPM its a different story.  3.73s with the 2.95 first gear is a really good combo.  You could also run 4.10s with that combo just fine. 

 

9/14/2016 5:54 PM  #27


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Rudi wrote:

Alessandro wrote:

Thanks guys you are great ! So many info for me !
Free beer in my garage !

 Castello Di Udine?

 
I live in THE motorvalley .  Ferrari ,lamborghini,Maserati ,pagani,ducati  all settle here around my town  .Modena !

     Thread Starter
 

9/14/2016 6:24 PM  #28


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

lowercasesteve wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

The trick there is that the stock Mustang T5 has a tall (numerically high) first gear of 3.35:1.  Most 5.0s were paired with 2.73 gears from the factory.  Like many things you need to look at all your gear ratios and how they affect a car's performance.  So your overall 1st gear ratio is important, because unless the engine will wind to 7,000RPM anything above about 12:1 feels very short, and you'll be shifting into 2nd almost immediately.  So, with 3.55s and a 3.35 first gear your overall first gear ratio was 11.89:1, which is about perfect for acceleration.  Guys used to run 3.73s, or even 4.10s, and I could pretty much tell what the rear gear the car had was by how they ran down the track.  With 4.10s they were shifting before the 60' mark.  It felt fast, but it actually killed their 60' time, which is the most important part of a dragrace; getting off the line.  Time saved in the 60' is basically worth double at the end of the track, so going from say a 2.00 to a 1.80 60' is going to drop your ET like 0.400, and the converse is also true. 

Why's this important?  Because if you elect to buy a Z-spec T5 it runs different gear ratios, and first is now only 2.95:1.  Ford did this because they knew these transmissions would be paired with steeper rear gears.  So with a 2.95 ratio the overall with 3.73s is now a much more manageable 11:1.  Like I said, you need to pair the trans and the rear for optimum performance. 



This is also why you avoid 4 cylinder T5s, because they had a 3.97:1 first gear to get that turd moving, but behind a V8 it acts like a granny low in a dump truck. 

Alessandro,  we are all different.  What TKO says is right on target if you are drag racing. 

I prefer mountain carving.  That said.  I have a T5 with the 3.35 first and a 3.0 rear end and don't like it.   Second to first downshifts have too great an rpm drop when I have to go down to first on a tight curve.  In addition, for driving around town I hate that first gear.  I want to have a longer time in first before going into second.  Shifting at around 3000 I would much prefer the 2.95 close ratio trans.  At highway speeds I'm only turning over around 1500 rpm.  The engine can handle that.  As a matter of fact it pulls from 1200 to 5500 with no problems.

I'm running a 375hp 351w In my '66.  I do not need as much rpm to do what I want considering the car weighs less than 3,000 lb (1361kg).  I seldom go over 5,000rpm.

I hope this does not confuse you too much.
 

No confused at all ! This is a big issue for me because is expensive , and most of all i dont wanna buy something wrong .
For example you are right that 1st and 2nd are not so drivable  ,  this " too short" gears is what i really dont want !
I have in mind what i wanna do with this car , and is very far from drag .
As you sayd mountain carving , or street will be much more close to me .
For me the perfect fit should be 1st and 2nd not too short , 3rd 4rd and long 5th.
Thanks ! Ciao

     Thread Starter
 

9/14/2016 9:29 PM  #29


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Alessandro wrote:

Rudi wrote:

Alessandro wrote:

Thanks guys you are great ! So many info for me !
Free beer in my garage !

 Castello Di Udine?

 
I live in THE motorvalley .  Ferrari ,lamborghini,Maserati ,pagani,ducati  all settle here around my town  .Modena !

 And you drive a classic Ford Mustang! I love it!


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

9/15/2016 4:56 AM  #30


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Mountain carving IS a drag race from corner to corner.  An old sprint car builder told me that.

You need to look at the RPM potential of your engine too.  A 331 making decent power should probably have a redline of 6,500RPM, which is a good 1,000RPM higher than a stock 302/289 that the early Mustangs had (excluding Hi-Po, Boss, etc.).  The Z-spec trans and a 3.73 gear would be perfect for your setup.

 

9/15/2016 9:04 AM  #31


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

TKOPerformance wrote:

Mountain carving IS a drag race from corner to corner.  An old sprint car builder told me that.

You need to look at the RPM potential of your engine too.  A 331 making decent power should probably have a redline of 6,500RPM, which is a good 1,000RPM higher than a stock 302/289 that the early Mustangs had (excluding Hi-Po, Boss, etc.).  The Z-spec trans and a 3.73 gear would be perfect for your setup.

 
Well it depends . ...  As icon  American drag race are straight to the point in shortest time .
Mountain carving or GTO driving are little different from 1. 2. 3  finish  quarter mile.
I dont Need to beat the time from corner to corner up on a mountain .
But For Sure i will use 2 3 and 4 gear for more time engaged in mid rev .
For example a drag race car will never suffer the engine brake of a downhill,
All the post are very good to clear my mind for my necessity .
During this month i realized that what i wanna do ivolves not only a part ad the car ,but like cascade one after another they are connected .
Speed and brake , suspension and upgrade, trans and rearend .
The unrealistic first budget was pass on in a blik.
As i have downsized my hp first madness , i Belive and agree with you that t5 z spec will match my request .
What you think about a 3,40 ?  Too long  ?
Thanks !

     Thread Starter
 

9/15/2016 2:08 PM  #32


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

With the Z-spec I would really shoot for that 3.73.  I think a 3.40 is a little too long for a trans with a 2.95 1st gear.  With less horsepower on tap you are also going to have less torque to bridge a less than ideal gear ratio.  I think a 3.73 with the 0.68 5th gear gives you reasonable highway RPM, even at 80mph, and your 1-2-3-4 shifting up and down will be very responsive and keep the engine in the sweet spot.  BUT, the key is rear tire size too, because a short tire will make it act like it has more gear, so with a short tire you could probably get by with a 3.40.  The problem is most performance tire sizes are going to be tall when you start talking about like 17" wheels.

 

9/16/2016 1:23 AM  #33


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

TKOPerformance wrote:

With the Z-spec I would really shoot for that 3.73.  I think a 3.40 is a little too long for a trans with a 2.95 1st gear.  With less horsepower on tap you are also going to have less torque to bridge a less than ideal gear ratio.  I think a 3.73 with the 0.68 5th gear gives you reasonable highway RPM, even at 80mph, and your 1-2-3-4 shifting up and down will be very responsive and keep the engine in the sweet spot.  BUT, the key is rear tire size too, because a short tire will make it act like it has more gear, so with a short tire you could probably get by with a 3.40.  The problem is most performance tire sizes are going to be tall when you start talking about like 17" wheels.

 
Ok lesson learned about rear gear !  About tire size  i cant do nothing except use the OEM size  205 x70x15  . here is not legal change tire size .

TKO  you have a PM

     Thread Starter
 

9/16/2016 5:00 AM  #34


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

So you'd be turning like 2,600 RPM at 80MPH with a 3.73 rear gear.  Those tires are 26.3" tall.  With a 3.40 rear gear you'd reduce RPM at that speed to 2,360.  IMO that trade off is not worth it for the reduction in acceleration in 1-4.

 

9/16/2016 7:06 AM  #35


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

TKOPerformance wrote:

IMO that trade off is not worth it for the reduction in acceleration in 1-4.

 
Please tell me in a different way ... Whats IMO ?

At 2300 rev in 5 th on highway is a good range or should better lower it ?

     Thread Starter
 

9/16/2016 7:21 AM  #36


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

IMO means, "In My Opinion"...........he tends to use that term alot.........

 

9/16/2016 7:43 AM  #37


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

What I'm saying is that a 240RPM reduction in highway cruising speed at 80MPH is not worth slower acceleration off the line and when running up and down through gears 1-4.  I would still run the 3.73 gears given the choice.

 

9/16/2016 8:00 AM  #38


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

I don't think they make 3.73 gears for a Ford 8" rear.  I think his options will be 3.00, 3.25, 3.40, 3.55, 3.80, or 4.11.

 

9/16/2016 9:17 AM  #39


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

The 8" rear has to go too.  Its not up to the task either.  A 9" would probably be simplest, but an 8.8 is also a good option. 

If you decide to run the 8" anyway, don't say I didn't warn you when it breaks, but the practical difference between a 3.73 and a 3.80 is pretty much meaningless, so use the 3.80 gearset.  Run a solid pinion bearing spacer and studs for the caps.  It will probably break the main case at the pinion pilot bearing bore anyway, but that will give it a chance.  There's a reason Ford put the 9" under every Mustang they built that had any kind of engine in it.  The 8" was fine for mild 289s and 302s, but much beyond that they just didn't last. 

 

9/16/2016 1:34 PM  #40


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

TKOPerformance wrote:

The 8" rear has to go too.  Its not up to the task either.  A 9" would probably be simplest, but an 8.8 is also a good option. 

If you decide to run the 8" anyway, don't say I didn't warn you when it breaks, but the practical difference between a 3.73 and a 3.80 is pretty much meaningless, so use the 3.80 gearset.  Run a solid pinion bearing spacer and studs for the caps.  It will probably break the main case at the pinion pilot bearing bore anyway, but that will give it a chance.  There's a reason Ford put the 9" under every Mustang they built that had any kind of engine in it.  The 8" was fine for mild 289s and 302s, but much beyond that they just didn't last. 

 
Ok ... I will Take into consideration 9 inch and what budget i can handle .
Its becoming like a neverending story ...

     Thread Starter
 

9/16/2016 2:00 PM  #41


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

I respect TKOPerformance's opinion and he generally gives good advice, but you can buy 4-pinion 8 inch center sections that are rated up to 550 or 600 horsepower.  If you are not planning on more horsepower than that I wouldn't worry about a 9 inch... unless you are planning on racing it and really abusing it.

Last edited by Michael H. (9/16/2016 2:16 PM)

 

9/16/2016 3:30 PM  #42


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

I swapped the 9" traction-lok in my Cobra a number of years ago to a Detroit TrueTrac and was very pleased with how it performed.  Two black stripes when required but turned without issues and they don't need friction modifiers.  It is offered for 8" Fords and I agree that unless you abuse it, the 8" should hold up well for spirited street driving.

 

9/16/2016 5:45 PM  #43


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

The differential may be rated to 550-600HP, but that's not what's going to break in an 8".  I've rebuilt a lot of rears over the years of all makes and models, and I've got a very good handle on what the strengths and weaknesses of each design are.  The Ford 8", and 9" too, have the pinion bearings too close together.  To "solve" this problem Ford added a pocket bearing and a nub on the end of the pinion to increase stability.  The problem is that the area in the case that supports that pocket bearing is thin and weak.  What will happen with a stock crush sleeve is that it will oscillate at speed.  Eventually the pinion will move in an elliptical orbit and put too much stress on that pocket bearing and bang, the case will fail right where the pocket bearing is.  You can improve the situation by using a solid spacer instead of a crush sleeve.  I never use crush sleeves.  But the weakness is there, coupled with the fact that 8" cases are all gray iron; it just won't last.

When I build a car I build it to take whatever abuse the engine can throw at it.  I usually build the drivetrain first now, because I've had too many vehicles where in my younger years I went into the engine first and ended up with a busted trans or rear and no cash to fix it.  Drivetrain strength isn't sexy, but the car that's on jack stands with a blown rear or busted trans isn't very sexy either. 

Sometimes there's not much you can do other than a custom rear, or trick custom parts, and I've built rears like that out of necessity.  But early Mustangs have a lot of bolt in and near bolt in options.  I'd bet you can find something in a junk yard over in Italy that has a Ford 8.8" or 9" rear in it and a shop that can modify it to fit your car.  IMO that's a better route than trying to make something live that won't, or worse, having to be easy on the car because you're afraid to break it.  I get the distinct impression you're building this car to run it hard.  There's nothing wrong with that, and its a lot more honest than a lot of people are when they build a car.  But being honest about it means addressing these things now, rather than the dishonest guy who addresses them later after something breaks.  Of course you'll be laughing at that guy when you drive past him...

 

9/16/2016 6:54 PM  #44


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Yawn.....

 

9/17/2016 2:58 AM  #45


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Michael H. wrote:

I respect TKOPerformance's opinion and he generally gives good advice, but you can buy 4-pinion 8 inch center sections that are rated up to 550 or 600 horsepower.  If you are not planning on more horsepower than that I wouldn't worry about a 9 inch... unless you are planning on racing it and really abusing it.

 
Thanks for advice !  This relief my wallet from estinguish ....
American and european peaople are different when talking about hp
Everyone has his point of view and goals .
Mostly i want to build a mustang that run fast , not a monster .
I have driven only a tired 66 fastback that can give , IMO  at least 160 hp .
I dont really know what will be have a 350 hp at the wheel .
The 4 pinion center section is the inside part of differential ?
Maybe is the same thing i wanna change from the beginning of this post .
I should go with powertrax grip pro that is a limited slip diff .
This if i have well inteded 
Thanks

     Thread Starter
 

9/17/2016 3:18 AM  #46


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

I'd bet you can find something in a junk yard over in Italy that has a Ford 8.8" or 9"

No TKO this is science fiction !  I can run  up an down Italy but is like to find a white unicorn .
Is a very small marketplace  the USA cars here , mostly conservative .
Is not worty travelling around europe looking for a 9 inch probably in poor condition ...
I have found on eBay USA one used center section 9 inch  28 spline .
This allows me to use my old axels if i found a 9 inch case ?
Bearing wheels are a problem ?
Swapping the 9 inch is a big job or not ?
Thanks

     Thread Starter
 

9/17/2016 6:11 AM  #47


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

No parts interchange between 8" and 9" rears.  Is not like you can just pop a 9" center section into an 8" housing and have a 9" rear.  You have to swap the whole thing from brake drum to brake drum.  Swapping a bolt in 9" made for your Mustang is not hard at all, just unbolt the 8" and bolt in the 9".  The issue with that approach is cost.  A bolt in 9" is going to run you around $2,500-$3,000 US, not including shipping and taxes.  That's why I'm suggesting looking for something in your area that can be modified to fit.  Its more work, but it saves considerable cost.

Don't look for high performance cars.  I'm sure those are rare.  Look for trucks and big sedans.  Spend some time on google and learn what an 8.8" and 9" rear look like.  Ford built tens of millions of each, some of them wound up in Italy.  You'll have to get a competent shop that can modify the housing to work in your Mustang, but its not that hard.  Plenty of amatures have successfully narrowed rears, and cut off the old brackets and welded leaf spring perches onto them for use in a different car.  Any competent welding and fab shop should be able to do it.  One that specializes in automotive fabrication would be preferred, but with proper guidance all you really need is someone who can measure and weld. 

 

9/17/2016 11:15 AM  #48


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

I should explain me better  my mistake !
I have found one center section 9 inch 28 spine and one axle case 9 inch .resonable price .
Just wanna know if my 28 spline axes could be re used but i think had the same answer . no mix
Ok i will search something  , no problem for welding here !
Thanks

     Thread Starter
 

9/17/2016 11:45 AM  #49


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

Alessandro wrote:

I should explain me better my mistake !
I have found one center section 9 inch 28 spine and one axle case 9 inch .resonable price .
Just wanna know if my 28 spline axes could be re used but i think had the same answer . no mix
Ok i will search something , no problem for welding here !
Thanks

Not so.  It gets a little complex, but... 
If your 8" axles have the same spline count as the 9" center section, then they will work together just fine. In your case both have 28 splines, so no problem.  And, if you don't bang shift the trans, the 28 spline axles are strong enough for your application.

The 9" housing must have the same width as your current 8" housing.  It can be shortened by a competent shop.  Do not try to do it yourself unless you have excellent fabrication skills. The spring pads must be repositioned to that of the 8" housing. (new ones can be purchased from most any Mustang house.)  The cutting and welding will throw the housing out of alignment, so you must re align the housing after each weld cycle.  The alignment process requires some special tools to make sure everything is correct.  Don't try it yourself.

And, finally, The axle bearing size must match the 9" housing bearing size.  9" axles came with two different bearing sizes.  They are very different, so you will know when you match them up.

To summarize.  The good news is that the 9" housing can be shortened to the size of the 8".  And if the bearings are different sizes, the end of the 8" housing where the bearing races are can be grafted on to the 9".

Alessandro,  it must be tough having this conversation with numerous Americans in a different time zone and using a language that is not your first language.  You've been doing a great job though.
 


Original owner - 351w,T-5, 4whl disks, power R&P
 

9/17/2016 2:04 PM  #50


Re: finally my fastback is on the lifter

lowercasesteve wrote:

Alessandro wrote:

I should explain me better my mistake !
I have found one center section 9 inch 28 spine and one axle case 9 inch .resonable price .
Just wanna know if my 28 spline axes could be re used but i think had the same answer . no mix
Ok i will search something , no problem for welding here !
Thanks

Not so.  It gets a little complex, but... 
If your 8" axles have the same spline count as the 9" center section, then they will work together just fine. In your case both have 28 splines, so no problem.  And, if you don't bang shift the trans, the 28 spline axles are strong enough for your application.

The 9" housing must have the same width as your current 8" housing.  It can be shortened by a competent shop.  Do not try to do it yourself unless you have excellent fabrication skills. The spring pads must be repositioned to that of the 8" housing. (new ones can be purchased from most any Mustang house.)  The cutting and welding will throw the housing out of alignment, so you must re align the housing after each weld cycle.  The alignment process requires some special tools to make sure everything is correct.  Don't try it yourself.

And, finally, The axle bearing size must match the 9" housing bearing size.  9" axles came with two different bearing sizes.  They are very different, so you will know when you match them up.

To summarize.  The good news is that the 9" housing can be shortened to the size of the 8".  And if the bearings are different sizes, the end of the 8" housing where the bearing races are can be grafted on to the 9".

Alessandro,  it must be tough having this conversation with numerous Americans in a different time zone and using a language that is not your first language.  You've been doing a great job though.
 

Wow ... It' quite huge job  .
what you say  is right and find capaple welder is not a problem ... But only to re use the axel and find right bearings to adapt something ....
Mmm... I Need to think it twice before i begin start something .
I havent leave the option to upgrade only the 8 inch  with LSD  .
work with less  hp first request  it will last for my week end cruising .

Btw yes ...sometimes is really difficult .    mostly because meaning and way of saying are untranslatabe .
But here i have found people with patience and passion .
Thanks for help !

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.