Can't tell from the pictures but do you have it installed correctly left to right?  Does the picture show it at ride height or fully extended.  It is not only the close proximity to the strut rods but the angle at the link is way off.  It appears that if you swapped it left to right it might sort it out.  Either that or they simply supplied the wrong bar.

The early '67 had the long shaft steering box with 1" sector shaft just like the '65/'66. I don't know if that would mean anything else in regards to your problem though.

This issue I've never heard of, but '67 was a changeover year.  Many parts on '67s are referred to as either "early" or "late".  The pitman arm for example changed from 1" to 1-1/8" shaft.  The fuel lines changed from 1 piece to 2 piece.  So anything's possible.

From what I was able to find the '67 is over 2" wider in track width than the '65-'66 cars.  BUT, I'm not sure how that change was made.  Much of the underlying sheetmetal is the same.  It could be that the control arms were lengthened, or it could have easily been accomplished in the spindles, OR knowing how kooky Ford is; it could have been both at different times.

If they are willing to exchange the bar for the earlier one I'd give that a try and see if it works. 
 

I've got an Addco on the front of my '67.  Fit like a glove.  Think I'd just send this one back and buy an Addco. 

Ok, so this has now been resolved. An thought you all may want to know the heads up result:   

The short of it :  DO NOT buy ST Suspension!!!  

Their customer service was very nice and tried to be helpful, but at the end of the day their part comes no where close to fitting.  And there is nothing "special" about my set-up that would make a part designed for stock no longer fit.  

I went back to the garage and specifically pulled it out myself and tried it the other way around just to make sure  (in case they just botched it) and they were right - it came no where close the even being able to make the connections at all.  The part measurements they sent me to verify I had the right part all checked out.  So I had the right part.  Putting the new bar next to the old stock one showed the significant differences between the two.  I have no idea how they have "been selling this part for 20 years with no issues" (as they claim).  

Now off to try and see if I can get some kind of extra anything for my lost $ installing it and lost hours sorting it out along with the return.
 

It sure as hell does look upside-down.  But I assure you it is not. Last time I was at the shop I even took it out myself and tried to fit it in both ways to make sure.  The other way around, the mid-points on the arms hit the frame when you try and rotate the ends up.  Come no where close to reaching the links.  Like 8" away.  

The be clear - the issue isn't the shop, the issue is the MANUFACTURER.  ST Suspensions and Bell Tech.  Not only are they the ones who tried to pitch the '65-'66 sway bar to me, but they also tried to use the VIN decode method that started in the '80s to figure out "when" my car was built during 1967!  They also gave me instructions that the installation needed to be done with the suspension under full car load, whereas their written directions with the part said do it with the suspension not under load.  Just a real sh*t show over there. 

See the image for the side-by-side of the stock bar to their bar. You can see the middle geometry is similar.  But once you get past the bushings, things start to change,  You can see immediately why it would interfere with the struts and have that ridiculous angle at the linkages,  





Stay away from ST Suspensions and their parent company Bell Tech (all the people I worked with on this were from Bell Tech)!  
 

Last edited by Big Tag (6/27/2018 8:24 AM)