Lost two tires today, all within 250 feet

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Posted by MS
10/24/2024 4:36 PM
#1

I pulled the convertible from the house garage to the shop today to get it ready to pull the engine and tranny, which have been sold.  Both front tires were blown out and departed the rims and the car before I could pull it onto the lift.  I have never experienced that before!




Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 
Posted by 6sally6
10/24/2024 4:38 PM
#2

Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 
Posted by Rufus68
10/24/2024 5:07 PM
#3

I'm curious to know more about the cause.  Be sure to update this once you understand why that happened.


1968 T-code Coupe with a 302.  Nice car, no show stopper for sure, but I like it.
 
Posted by MS
10/24/2024 5:19 PM
#4

I think it was that the tires were quite old and dry rotted, even  though they still had the little nubs on the tread from being nearly “new”.  Both had major blowouts and tread separation, like a 6” x 6” piece blown off. I decided to drive it with flats to put it on the lift so it would be easier to jack up the car.
I think the date codes were from 1997
It has been parked quite a while. Looks like they parked it because the brakes failed big time.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 
Posted by Rufus68
10/24/2024 5:29 PM
#5

Yeah, can't make a turn at all on a flat tire.


1968 T-code Coupe with a 302.  Nice car, no show stopper for sure, but I like it.
 
Posted by BobE
10/25/2024 7:38 AM
#6

That is weird.  Do you have any 'after' pictures of the tires?


65 Fastback, 351W, 5-speed, 4 wheel discs, 9" rear,  R&C Front End.
 
Posted by Rudi
10/25/2024 8:46 AM
#7

I’m wondering if you had to add air before you started moving it?


Good work ain't cheap, Cheap work ain't good!   Simple Man
 
Posted by John Ha Online!
10/26/2024 5:24 AM
#8

MS wrote:

Curious that your car does not have the extra braces between the cowl and the inner fender that the convertible engine compartments normally had.  


Founding Member of the Perpetually Bewildered Society
 
Posted by MS
10/26/2024 9:24 AM
#9

John Ha wrote:

MS wrote:

Curious that your car does not have the extra braces between the cowl and the inner fender that the convertible engine compartments normally had.  

No brackets for the braces and no holes. August 1964 build date. I was under the impression those may have come along later in the game, but am not sure. I plan to remove that cheap chrome export brace and install a real one and leave it at that.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 
Posted by John Ha Online!
10/26/2024 10:18 AM
#10

MS wrote:

No brackets for the braces and no holes. August 1964 build date. I was under the impression those may have come along later in the game, but am not sure.

Yup, you're right.  I didn't realize it was an early 65.  Those braces were added in the later 65 convertible models.  Thanks!


Founding Member of the Perpetually Bewildered Society
 
Posted by MS
10/26/2024 12:16 PM
#11


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 
Posted by Bentworker
10/26/2024 1:00 PM
#12

1997 date code!!!

At least you didn’t end up with body damage.

 
Posted by BobE
10/28/2024 10:11 AM
#13

Wow, that still is weird.  While I would guess age is a factor, maybe the hot Texas weather was a factor also (?).


65 Fastback, 351W, 5-speed, 4 wheel discs, 9" rear,  R&C Front End.
 
Posted by rpm
10/28/2024 1:53 PM
#14

Weird yes, butt not unusual for that brand and model. I had one come apart while parked on a project Mustang.


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 
Posted by RCodePaul
10/29/2024 2:16 PM
#15

rpm wrote:

Weird yes, butt not unusual for that brand and model. I had one come apart while parked on a project Mustang.

I thought the same thing when I saw MS's photo. I've bought old non-BFG tires and had them hold up for decades. I have a BMW 2002 that's been sitting since 2000 (yeah, I like to age 'em buh fore I git to 'em) and the tars are fine (by comparison.) The only tire I've ever seen come apart like that was a BFG Radial TA that didn't look bad before it completely fell apart. 
 


69 SCJ Mach1 Acapulco Blue/Black Ram Air  65 Fastback 422W C4 Disk brakes, 9in
 
Posted by Rudi
10/29/2024 2:52 PM
#16

The  BFG Radial T/A  generally have a bad reputation..
Other than a set of BFG  GForce Comp2 the only tires I’ve ever had were Radial T/A, I’m on my third set right now.
The only valid reason I have is that they seem to work for my driving style.
I’d go back to the g-Force if we’re still available in the 15” sizes I want. They definitely were my hands down  favourite for looks and performance.


Good work ain't cheap, Cheap work ain't good!   Simple Man
 
Posted by MS
10/29/2024 3:12 PM
#17

Yep
These BFG’s looked new until the day they… didn’t.

I mistyped BFG as NFG the first pass in this post. Thinking that would probably be a better name for them if you think about it.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 
Posted by rpm
10/29/2024 6:24 PM
#18

MS wrote:

Yep
These BFG’s looked new until the day they… didn’t.

I mistyped BFG as NFG the first pass in this post. Thinking that would probably be a better name for them if you think about it.

 
🤣


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 
Posted by 6sally6
11/03/2024 8:01 PM
#19

Maybe you shoulda tried some "run-flats" like this dude !!


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 


 
Main page
Login
Desktop format