Carbon-Fiber 1969 Ford Mustang

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Posted by BobE
11/29/2024 10:51 AM
#1
Posted by Rufus68
11/29/2024 12:31 PM
#2

1968 T-code Coupe with a 302.  Nice car, no show stopper for sure, but I like it.
 
Posted by Nos681
11/29/2024 7:36 PM
#3

If you know his password, it’s not a problem. 😁

 
Posted by TKOPerformance Online!
11/30/2024 9:46 AM
#5

And my thoughts are: meh. 

 
Posted by rpm
11/30/2024 10:25 AM
#6

More cars that won't be driven.


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 
Posted by RTM
11/30/2024 10:48 AM
#7

That's a lot of money and I'm not a fan of that wide body look.

 
Posted by 6sally6
12/02/2024 3:10 PM
#8

For nearly a 1/2 mill ya think they coulda  done a better job. (it make me think of that abortion Mustang in the commercial)
yuke !
New-generation-thinking with 'fat-a$$ wimmen' as a model perhaps !
Maybe younger future millionaires see this as sexy !? (they should take a look at 60's models for sexy)
6sal6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 
Posted by Ron68
12/02/2024 11:33 PM
#9

That is a definite pass for me. Keep the carbon fiber stuff for all the ricers and the very expensive sports cars. Besides, that over smoothed body looks like a plastic toy model. There is absolutely no substitute for the original. JMHO.


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 
Posted by Texas!
12/03/2024 6:45 AM
#10

From the article:
"In addition to V-8 engines that ranged from 351 to 429 cubic inches in displacement, a four-speed manual transmission, 9-inch “Trac-Lok” rearend, and other mechanical bits that made the ’69 Mach 1 a beast in its heyday"
Wrong. The 429 was not available in the '69 Mach1. There was a '69 Boss 429 car and engine but no Mach1 with a 429 until '71.
 

 
Posted by TKOPerformance Online!
12/03/2024 8:10 AM
#11

Texas! wrote:

From the article:
"In addition to V-8 engines that ranged from 351 to 429 cubic inches in displacement, a four-speed manual transmission, 9-inch “Trac-Lok” rearend, and other mechanical bits that made the ’69 Mach 1 a beast in its heyday"
Wrong. The 429 was not available in the '69 Mach1. There was a '69 Boss 429 car and engine but no Mach1 with a 429 until '71.
 

Good call.  I seem to recall the 428 was the top dog, but also seem to recall seeing a 390 Mach 1 years ago. 

 
Posted by Greg B
12/03/2024 8:32 AM
#12

Seems like the lifesize Lego Mustang would be much cheaper.


If multiple things can go wrong, the one that will go wrong will be the one that causes the most damage.
 
Posted by Mach1Driver
12/03/2024 9:29 AM
#13

If it turns out anything like the renderings....UG. Ya can't improve on the perfection of the 69.

 
Posted by wsinsle
12/03/2024 9:48 AM
#14

Or you could buy a real nice 69 Mach 1 for less than a 1/4 of the price that actually looks like a 69 Mach 1. 


If this forum can't fix it, it isn't broke.
 


 
Main page
Login
Desktop format