FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

4/17/2013 8:26 PM  #1


New exhaust

I am just about ready to get exhaust put on my 67. It has a 302, 4v with a mild cam. What size pipe would you recommend? 2" , 2-1/4, or 2-1/2". Most likely will just be street driven. What advantages or disadvantages are the different sizes? Has long tube headers on it.

 

Last edited by Alan (4/17/2013 8:47 PM)


67 Coupe, 5.0 EEC IV Fuel injected. T5, 3:70 rear
 

4/18/2013 10:01 AM  #2


Re: New exhaust

If it's a coupe/fastback 2 1/2"  On a convertable  2 1/4"  may be a better choice because of the  cross over plate.  I have seen the larger diameters on the convertable but it takes more work to get it right.


Good work ain't cheap, Cheap work ain't good!   Simple Man
 

4/18/2013 10:32 AM  #3


Re: New exhaust

2-1/4" seems to make the most sense on a small block.  It is alot easier to fit, is a little quieter than 2-1/2" and is less money.  It will still flow more than your engine can pump.


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 

4/18/2013 4:20 PM  #4


Re: New exhaust

I am leaning toward 2-1/4. Is 2" too restrictive?
 


67 Coupe, 5.0 EEC IV Fuel injected. T5, 3:70 rear
     Thread Starter
 

4/18/2013 9:54 PM  #5


Re: New exhaust

Probably not....if you use a free flow mufler.
That's where most "restriction" stems from, not so much the pipe dia.
6sally6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

4/19/2013 1:05 PM  #6


Re: New exhaust

I'm with the rest.  On a mild 302 a 2 1/4" pipe is plenty.  You will not get to the rpm level where more volume is needed.  And you cannot believe how much more room underneath you will have for other stuff using a 2 1/4 vs 2 1/2 pipes.  I use only a 2/12 on my 351w.

Even the 2" would probably work just fine for normal driving, but you might find yourself  little lacking at the top end with sprightly driving.

Last edited by lowercasesteve (4/19/2013 3:31 PM)


Original owner - 351w,T-5, 4whl disks, power R&P
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.