| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
Offline
NO! What does the bore look like?
Offline
Looks like there is some of that evident on the top (No. 1) ring also. Bad bore? Chatter on the boring tool? Never seen anything like that. What engine is that? Not a stock SBF I'd say.
BB1
Offline
Dixon’s busted FE.
Only thing I can think of is ring compressor damage during install, if it was one of those type that have a corrugated type clamp surface?
John, what did you use?
Offline
My worthless guess is that the #2 ring was damaged on install like you said, but the top ring means the engine potentially got really hot. What does the cylinder wall look like? A really long time ago I had scuffing like that on the top rings and the cylinder wall showed similar issues. My engine always ran hot and did not perform well, upon disassembly the pistons would barely move on the rods. It was either heat or poor assembly by the machine shop.
Last edited by Raymond_B (2/07/2021 11:34 PM)
Offline
That's a strange one. The pattern doesn't look like one seen when the piston scuffed. That looks like a lot of straight lines very close together and you'd see evidence of it on the piston skirt as well.
If the bore is relatively smooth I'm inclined to believe that its some kind of installation error/damage.
One thought is that there wasn't enough back clearance between the ring and piston. This can also cause scuffing and damage even if the PTW clearance was right, and the ring endgaps were right.
Offline
Seems to line up with what looks like excessive blow by on top ring in one spot. Hard to tell for sure by the pic
Ring upside down?
Oil & carbon getting trap between top 2 rings hydraulic cutting the 2nd ring because of excessive blow by? Just a guess.
Last edited by red351 (2/08/2021 11:00 AM)
Offline
That was caused by ring flutter. Basically, that ring is too small for the gap in that piston. It moved up and down in its groove and at speed, the harmonic vibrations caused that ring to lift off the bore and hot gasses of blowby ate those marks into the ring. It had to run like crap, have a lot of backpressure, and used oil like nobody's business. Are all eight.like that?
Offline
I thought that piston looked familiar. The C-clip on the wrist pin is not typical for a small block Ford!!!.
MS wrote:
Dixon’s busted FE.
Only thing I can think of is ring compressor damage during install, if it was one of those type that have a corrugated type clamp surface?
John, what did you use?
It started life for me as a bargain rebuild from A-Guaranteed motors that is no longer in business. I can’t tell what they used to install the rings. It’s very doubtful they used a torque plate for boring /
honing either. When I converted from a 390 to a 410 with a crank swap (you can do that with truck pistons), I don’t think I ever removed the rings. They could have been on upside down, I guess.
That piston was #1 or #5, there should be a mark on the rod. The crank broke between #1 and #2 mains. From memory, the bore didn’t look too bad. I will try to dig up some pictures this evening.
It never ran hot, I would leave it idling in the driveway in the summer to see where it would go temp wise and 220 was typical.
The rings moved freely on the pistons at tear down.
Blow by, it would push the dipstick up out of the dipstick tube.
Installation error or damage, all ways a possibility with me. I really expected to find a broke ring when I took it apart, but none were.
Ring flutter…that’s a new one to me. It ran really well. For the 6000 mile I got out of the motor, I didn’t have to add oil between changes. I kept one of the piston/rod combos and can try to measure the rings and gaps this afternoon. The block went to the scrap yard a while back.
Offline
Will be interesting to see if the rings on the piston you have match the marks on this one.
I am getting ready to do forensics on Al’s kaput 351 when he brings it down to me. You guys know how I like to inspect every tiny detail to see what could have caused his engine to lock up.
I though those vertical ring marks were very odd.
Offline
wait Al's Kaput 351???? the one he just put into his car? ( like 2 years ago)
Last edited by Gaba (2/09/2021 8:57 AM)
Offline
Gaba wrote:
wait Al's Kaput 351???? the one he just put into his car? ( like 2 years ago)
Yeah, he took it out to WRING IT OUT A BIT and now it is seized up.
But don’t let that worry you. Yours will be fine!
Offline
MS wrote:
But don’t let that worry you. Yours will be fine!
Brahahaha!
Offline
Jeezz...I go ring out the Heap a little and it eats the main bearings after over 30K of doing just fine. Now Al's new (unrelated) 351 seizes while he's "ringing it out a bit". Gotta be some kind of conspiracy. Sorry to hear about that, Al.
Last edited by Bullet Bob (2/09/2021 4:02 PM)
Offline
I hate to hear about Al's motor....... I bet he hates it too. Did it sieze while he was wring-ing it out. Or it would crank up for the next trip???
This is piston #5. MS has the #1 piston.....matches his stature with the group!!!
No funny marks on the rings for #5. It was next to the side that let go. This is all coming back like a nightmare!! There was some oil starvation in the motor before it let go as noticed on the #2 main. These are poor pictures of the cylinder bores, but its the best I have.
Last edited by Bolted to Floor (2/09/2021 8:16 PM)
Offline
Why do the cylinder walls not show much cross hatching from honing?
Offline
Bearing Bob wrote:
Why do the cylinder walls not show much cross hatching from honing?
Its just a bad picture, the cross hatching was there.
Offline
What's concerning about the cylinder is that the vertical lines travel all the way to the top of the bore. If these were caused by a ring issue those lines should stop short of the top. There's always an area at the top of the bore that's out of ring travel. Typically you find a dark ring at the top of the bore, and can sometimes find a ridge there from the rings wearing the area below it. To me this looks like marks from the boring bar that weren't completely removed by the hone.
Obviously there was something wrong in cylinder #5. That skirt shows serious damage.
Crosshatch, for what its worth, is a misunderstood metric of bore health. I've never seen an engine where you couldn't still see at least some of the cross hatch. Maybe years ago when chrome rings were a thing the rings would chew the crosshatch completely out of the bores as the engine wore out, but with modern rings every engine I've ever torn down (including ones that had blowby) always showed some crosshatch. When you get a freshly honed block back the crosshatch should be barely visible, if at all. Honing a bore is like honing a knife. If you look at the edge of a knife under a microscope as you sharpen it you will see little fingers of metal appear. The final honing and stropping aligns al those finger towards the cutting edge center line. This is the same with a bore. After the hone all the fingers are laying in there homes. When the crosshatch becomes evident its because the rings have torn those fingers out of the bore wall. Smokey Yunick devoted three pages to discussing bore prep in his book, and he investigated it thoroughly, including cutting blocks up and looking at them under a microscope. As I read it I got to thinking and it caused me to change my thinking, which had really just been using "common knowledge". Bottom line, you can't tell much just because you can still see the crosshatch. There's a lot of other things that can still be wrong with the bore (out of round, taper, wasn't bored with a torque plate, etc.).
Back to your engine, I'm wondering if everything was checked when it was assembled? Who did the assembly? I'm wondering if the machine shop made a mistake with respect to PTW clearance, or if there was a mismatch between the rings and pistons. Were the parts purchased individually or as part of a kit?
Offline
Speaking of seizing one up ...after ringing-it-out-a-little........
My buddy (and his youngster) raced dirt track stuff a few years.
I/we built the 350 "Shivel-lay" engine for it and it won a couple of races!!! Yaaaaaa!
They up-graded the carb with a new one from Proform.
Anyhow the engine locked up solid at 6500 RPM when a screw from the carb got sucked inside the engine!!
Talk about carnage!!!Rods pulled in two...broken crank...windows in the block... Intake and piece-of-poop carb was all that was saved!
Offline
The rebuilder didn’t the first assembly years ago. I did the assemble after I swapped the crank and had it balanced. The machinist reported the PTW clearance was good. The busted crank was the major player in how bad that one piston looks.
Mike, that’s a sad story.
Last edited by Bolted to Floor (2/11/2021 10:10 AM)
Offline
Mike I had a close one with the red car a few yrs ago. With the ram air, the cleaner and hood sit tight together and lid bolt broke at the carb. So the bolt later unscrewed from the wing nut and dropped down in side the carb. It was laying sideways and would not have taken much to go on down with a heavy foot. Bet that would have made a noise
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |