FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

6/15/2021 8:53 AM  #26


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

Gaba wrote:

Raymond_B wrote:

Did Calvert vat the block? Were the heads cleaned up prior to assembly? Not criticizing so please don't take this wrong, but that thing is filthy.

 
Raymond::

Heads were new.. I cleaned as much as I could.

Pretty sure it was vat-ed

Rudi: all short block stuff was cleaned with brake clean before assembly

Gotcha, what about your valve covers, oil pan, intake, timing cover, etc. How were they cleaned? Oil pump pickup? Just trying to think of sources of all the dirt.
 

 

6/15/2021 9:27 AM  #27


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

The vertical lines in the bore are concerning to me.  I'm assuming these were not there when the engine came back from the machine shop? 

 

6/15/2021 11:07 AM  #28


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

For Prof, have you tried the embed feature for sharing the pics? With Flickr, using the BBCode choice shows the picture instead of a link in the posts.
 
 Gaba, I sure hate to see you have to go through this. Several of us have already....this is not a place where misery loves company!! 
 
I do see the marks on the bearings, do the pictures do them justice…. are the groves better or worse than they appear on the computer screen. Will a finger nail grab on any of the groves in the bearings? I don’t know that bearing material is gonna cause that much wear for the cylinders.
 
With the buildup on the piston tops, could there have been a vacuum leak? How does the intake ports look on the heads? Intake gasket was sealed well?
 
You mentioned the flex plate bolts imprinted on the torque converter. Is there a chance of a this pushing the crank forward? How does the thrust bearing look and did yall measure it before pulling it apart?
 
Did the cam turn freely in the block during assemble?

And finally, what's the story with this comment??

MS wrote:

Don’t forget about the most important engine assembly procedure used.

Park the incomplete assembly near workbench. Use angle grinder to distribute grinding dust all over the shop.

Just sayin’… might not be the cause, but…

 


John  -- 67 Mustang Coupe 390 5 speed
 

6/15/2021 11:22 AM  #29


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

Bolted to Floor wrote:

For Prof, have you tried the embed feature for sharing the pics? With Flickr, using the BBCode choice shows the picture instead of a link in the posts.
 
 Gaba, I sure hate to see you have to go through this. Several of us have already....this is not a place where misery loves company!! 
 
I do see the marks on the bearings, do the pictures do them justice…. are the groves better or worse than they appear on the computer screen. Will a finger nail grab on any of the groves in the bearings? I don’t know that bearing material is gonna cause that much wear for the cylinders.
 
With the buildup on the piston tops, could there have been a vacuum leak? How does the intake ports look on the heads? Intake gasket was sealed well?
 
You mentioned the flex plate bolts imprinted on the torque converter. Is there a chance of a this pushing the crank forward? How does the thrust bearing look and did yall measure it before pulling it apart?
 
Did the cam turn freely in the block during assemble?

And finally, what's the story with this comment??

MS wrote:

Don’t forget about the most important engine assembly procedure used.

Park the incomplete assembly near workbench. Use angle grinder to distribute grinding dust all over the shop.

Just sayin’… might not be the cause, but…

 

no bearings look just as they seem in the pics. No deep grooves, nothing catches the nail.

Cylinder wear... i didnt think there was bad cylinder wear. The vertical lines are smooth and dont catch the nail

Build up on piston tops.... Vaccum leak not that I know of. The gaskets were glued on so well, I am having a tough time cleaning them off the heads now. oil blowby.. maybe.. i dont know how to tell.

it could be, I am going to possibly use thinner head bolts the next time to make sure that doesnt happen. Also the engine to Torque converter alignment was hard to accomplish with me on the back. I could have made a litte alignment mistake.

Thrus bearing side is pictured above with multiple pics.. chekc it out , let me know what you think.

Did cam spin freely during assembly >. NO .. not as smooth as i have been told it should have been. It was hard to spin even with the timing gear on. or hard to start spinning

Story on that comment is.. engine was built and sitting with valve covers not installed on the engine stand..

About 10ft away, my buddy and I start cleaning accessory brackets for the engine, to scour them, get rust off so we could paint them . The shop fan was blowing, as it was hot, and then I look over and see a fine misting of those shavings on the top of the rockers... and I stopped all operations, cleaned it best I could, covered it, and crossed my fingers.

but even if that was an issue, I had 3 oil changes on this oil , and the bearing material KEPT coming. never stopped.
 


If it aint broke, I have'nt tried to "Fix" it yet!
     Thread Starter
 

6/15/2021 11:23 AM  #30


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

TKOPerformance wrote:

The vertical lines in the bore are concerning to me.  I'm assuming these were not there when the engine came back from the machine shop? 

They were not. They smooth and the other side of the lines are on piston skirts as photographed. All smooth , nail doesnt catch on piston or cylinder walls.


If it aint broke, I have'nt tried to "Fix" it yet!
     Thread Starter
 

6/15/2021 6:05 PM  #31


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

I'm liking the way Bolted to the Floor is thinking about the torque converter might be pushing the crank forward.

Gaba, did you confirm there was a gap between the flex plate and torque converter before bolting them together?


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

6/15/2021 7:03 PM  #32


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

It all looks like sand, or honing grit or valve lapping compound damage.   Its not chunks, it was definitely something abrasive circulating in the oil.  Did you cut the filter open and see what it caught?


If multiple things can go wrong, the one that will go wrong will be the one that causes the most damage.
 

6/15/2021 8:03 PM  #33


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

The machine shop I use told me to clean all the cylinders with ATF before assembly then lather the pistons and cylinders real good with it. The rubbing from the dampener and the fly wheel is a hint to some sort of issue. The front cam bearing is real close to the oil pump and the first area to receive oil from the pump. I don't see that bearing as the cause. Because it got "filled" with metal makes it hard to turn. The two black pistons most likely are that way because of the plugs not firing causing the oil to not get washed out when the gas is not ignited. Check your distributor gear real closely and the cam gear. You should only see a slight decolorization towards a silver color. A roller cam gear and distributor gear need to be totally compatible. No guessing. If you are using your original distributer I would say that is your problem. The gear can be changed. 


70, ragtop 351W/416 stroker Edel Performer heads w pro flow 4, Comp roller 35-421-8. T5
 

6/15/2021 9:11 PM  #34


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

The torque converter would have to have been improperly installed in the transmission for it to be pushing the crank forward. I would think that would have been a very noticeable TRANNY IS NOW GARBAGE signal rather than anything else.

It is the purpose of the flexplate to hold the converter fully seated in the crankshaft, and it cannnot push forward on the crank. Heck it can slide fore and aft far enough to get the converter studs out of the flexplate.  I doubt there is any issue there.

Just need proper flexplate bolts with thinner heads, like offered by ARP. 

Gaba, what was the end play in the crank when you assembled the engine?

I still think this whole thing was caused by grinding in the area where the incomplete engine was sitting.
And, as I recall, you had issues with spark plug wire connections that had to be redone which could explain why those cylinders were not firing.

The cam bearings likely were damaged when they were put in the block as evidenced by the cam not wanting to rotate when first installed.  I think your only real mistake was not knowing to stop at that point until the cam would spin freely.  And maybe the grinding thing…


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 

6/16/2021 6:05 AM  #35


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3vmwwtkm77f4ejr/Photo%20Jun%2015%2C%2010%2005%2018%20AM.jpg?dl=0

Here is the distributor gear

The engine had been throtoughly washed with a pressure washer and soap before assembly

Engine also had three complete oil changes .

Oil filter only showed shiny non magnetic material being caught as I saw it

It’s going to a new machine shop today — Kim barr.. Kim barr had a theory that he thinks the engine components were not balanced properly .. but definitely wants to redo all line hones, cylinder hones etc.

New rings will go in no question asked . I was worried I had gapped them wrong , and I will redo those with new cylinder hone.

Kim barr also said to bring the cam , as he has noticed a bunch of “bowed” cams from factory. 0.005 off .. with a total clearance available on the bearings of 0.003 .

He insisted that bring the new cam to him to check the new bearings with towards the end of his work

Still a 2 -3 week wait


If it aint broke, I have'nt tried to "Fix" it yet!
     Thread Starter
 

6/16/2021 6:50 AM  #36


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

I'll be interested to see his take on it.  Those lines in the bores are not a good sign.  Something was in there and caused that.  I've pulled engines apart that had 200k on them that didn't have lines like that. 

If the cam didn't turn smoothly that was your sign to stop.  A cam should spin with no resistance.  It could definitely be bent.  Anything is possible but I've never seen any engine that had a cam bore that wasn't straight.  Crank bores, sure, but never a cam bore. 

 

6/17/2021 11:52 AM  #37


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

 
 

Bearing Bob wrote:

I'm liking the way Bolted to the Floor is thinking about the torque converter might be pushing the crank forward.

 
Following my train of thought can be a dangerous and frustrating thing. 
 

MS wrote:

The torque converter would have to have been improperly installed in the transmission for it to be pushing the crank forward. I would think that would have been a very noticeable TRANNY IS NOW GARBAGE signal rather than anything else.

It is the purpose of the flexplate to hold the converter fully seated in the crankshaft, and it cannnot push forward on the crank. Heck it can slide fore and aft far enough to get the converter studs out of the flex plate. I doubt there is any issue there.


Gaba, what was the end play in the crank when you assembled the engine?

 
My train of thought was more along the lines of the torque converter snout being bigger than the back of the crank. If the TC couldn’t mate flush with the flex plate, then the flax plate gets pulled to the TC with tight bolts and causes a bowl effect on the flex plate. Still can’t say for certain it would cause thrust wear. I would be interested in before and after end play measurements as well.
 

Gaba wrote:

It’s going to a new machine shop today — Kim barr.. Kim barr had a theory that he thinks the engine components were not balanced properly .. but definitely wants to redo all line hones, cylinder hones etc.

Kim barr also said to bring the cam , as he has noticed a bunch of “bowed” cams from factory. 0.005 off .. with a total clearance available on the bearings of 0.003 .

He insisted that bring the new cam to him to check the new bearings with towards the end of his work

 
I would need more details on how an imbalance can cause the issues you are seeing. I would think it would have been shaking the car if it was out that far. I can believe a cam that’s not straight. I wouldn’t take the last guys word for any work performed, I would expect him to go over the block again and check everything.
 
Will you be replacing the cam you just removed? Kinda sounds that way.
 
As with most root cause failures, you can’t blame it on one thing. There is a combination of issues that yields the final result.


John  -- 67 Mustang Coupe 390 5 speed
 

6/17/2021 5:59 PM  #38


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

You don have a pic of the cam gear. On the left side of the pic it looks like the dist gear is chipped. Both are ferris though. Just observations not conclusions  


70, ragtop 351W/416 stroker Edel Performer heads w pro flow 4, Comp roller 35-421-8. T5
 

6/19/2021 1:24 PM  #39


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

Update #1

The cam (bought brand new from summit and dip shipped from Howard’s cam) was warped 0.010”

Apparently this is a big issue with cam manufacturers now a days . They have warped / bent cores they are machining .

According to Kim barr 1 or every 5 cams of any company he is working with are warped , that he then has to straighten out ..

The max clearance on a cam bearing is 0.003” so if it’s not within that spec , it ain’t right.


If it aint broke, I have'nt tried to "Fix" it yet!
     Thread Starter
 

6/19/2021 3:14 PM  #40


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

What's the run out max on a cam? Per Ed Iskenderian, grinding the lobes causes the shaft to move. It's gotta be checked throughout the grinding process. But since time is money, whooo cares, ship it.


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

6/19/2021 4:06 PM  #41


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

The way I've sen a lot of them packed over the years I wonder if its warped cores or that they got dropped during shipping. 

 

6/19/2021 5:27 PM  #42


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

It's been said a crank must be stored standing straight up to avoid warpage. Since the internet said so, it must be true. If it was bent that much, it must been a real problem sliding it in.   Small details 101.   If it doesn't seem right, it's time to check why..... It seems odd cam bearing # 1 failed so bad, and the rest are so so maybe.
Just my opinion.

So what's the deal with the damper & converter bolt head marks and thrust bearing wear.

Last edited by red351 (6/19/2021 5:53 PM)

 

8/05/2021 9:30 AM  #43


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

ALRIGHT FOLKS!!! its built and going! BIG , HUGE , MASSIVE, GINORMOUS thanks to AL McGee and Paul May , for all the help and support and late nights, and broken backs! you both are amazing! Paul helped me by letting me use his lift, and bugging him day in and day out with questions, and texts.. and then doing stuff to my car i was too afraid too !! :D

AL,Thank you for going out of your way to help with this crazy project and sticking with me !

It was a fun time, and stressful time, but it got done!

347 is running well !! i will post details about the engine, and pics and videos later.


If it aint broke, I have'nt tried to "Fix" it yet!
     Thread Starter
 

8/05/2021 9:33 AM  #44


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

Gaba wrote:

ALRIGHT FOLKS!!! its built and going! BIG , HUGE , MASSIVE, GINORMOUS thanks to AL McGee and Paul May , for all the help and support and late nights, and broken backs! you both are amazing! Paul helped me by letting me use his lift, and bugging him day in and day out with questions, and texts.. and then doing stuff to my car i was too afraid too !! :D

AL,Thank you for going out of your way to help with this crazy project and sticking with me !

It was a fun time, and stressful time, but it got done!

347 is running well !! i will post details about the engine, and pics and videos later.

Good for you man! I like to hear about success stories...kudos to your "pitcrew"....

 

8/05/2021 10:12 AM  #45


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

That's got to be a good feeling, congrads!


If this forum can't fix it, it isn't broke.
 

8/05/2021 10:24 AM  #46


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2





I'm SURE.....you will be holding your breathe every time you crank-it-up......change the oil
first time.... you really wind-it-up your "butt will be so tight you couldn't drive a hat pin in it with a sledge hammer".....Butt, EVENTUALLY.....you will be able to relax and enjoy the "fruits of your hard work and disappointments."
Kinda like wimmen hav'in babys....swear they'll never go through that pain again and then.......out pops number FOUR!!
Keep us updated with pictures and videos.....(oh that's right.....we can't post pitcherz no more!!!
6sally6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

8/05/2021 10:25 AM  #47


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

Happy for you brother. It's good to have friends willing to help. Heck, I'd rather work on someone else's car than mine.


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

8/05/2021 11:02 AM  #48


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

I’m right behind you Gaba
I bought a blueprint 347 (433tq 416hp)
Edelbrock Proflo EFI
Borgeson steering conversion
And if i ever get to MS house a rear axle with disc brakes
With the T5 already installed and the vintage air should  nice


68 Cougar XR7 347 stroker T5 3:80
 

8/05/2021 2:24 PM  #49


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

I’m glad it’s up and running brother.

 

8/06/2021 4:42 AM  #50


Re: Gaba's 347 stroker build -- Try 2

That’s fantastic.


John  -- 67 Mustang Coupe 390 5 speed
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.