| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
Its stuff like this that's my biggest gripe about the old Autolites. The carbs themselves were fine, but they've been out of production for so long that the replacement parts are no longer OE quality, leading you to chase an issue that the new parts actually caused. Ultimately this an ease of tuning is why my Autolite is on a shelf and an Edelbrock is under my hood. Glad you got is sorted out. Also glad you knew not to throw out the old parts!
Offline
I wanted to double check my fuel levels in the float bowls one more time... What do you guys find to be the best? Does anyone have a shop manual that refers to wet levels for a 289?
Mines currently at about .93" or so, but that might be a little too low?
Thanks
Last edited by Toploader (9/07/2021 5:43 AM)
Offline
Glad you got it figured out.
Offline
Toploader wrote:
I wanted to double check my fuel levels in the float bowls one more time... What do you guys find to be the best? Does anyone have a shop manual that refers to wet levels for a 289?
Mines currently at about .93" or so, but that might be a little too low?
Thanks
.930 seems way low, where did you get that number from? Is that carb original to that engine?
According to the chart I googled for a 65-289 the primary and secondary is 29/64” ( .453” )
For a 66-289 primary is 1/2” (.500”) secondary is 5/8” (.625”)
Offline
The information seems to be all over the place...
I'm also seeing for an early 1964 289, the setting is 21/32".
The carburettor is original to the car and my car was manufactured in 1964.
Offline
I have not rebuilt a carb in many years but the kits used to come with a float level gauge.
Offline
Carburetor-parts.com has a 4100 rebuild write up and video with a list of correct float level measurements.
Offline
I ended up setting the floats by the 21/32" measurement.
In reality, my floats are sitting at .67" and the fuel is sitting at .79". I checked all this with the engine running and shut off.
It seems good and the fuel is just below the rubber overflow.
I rechecked the air/fuel mixture and the engine is running nice, so I think I will leave well enough alone and just enjoy driving.
Thanks for the advice everyone.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
Its stuff like this that's my biggest gripe about the old Autolites. The carbs themselves were fine, but they've been out of production for so long that the replacement parts are no longer OE quality, leading you to chase an issue that the new parts actually caused. Ultimately this an ease of tuning is why my Autolite is on a shelf and an Edelbrock is under my hood. Glad you got is sorted out. Also glad you knew not to throw out the old parts!
I tend to agree TKO. I remember speaking to Jon years ago when I was making a decision on what carburettor and he simply convinced me that Autolite was the best as Ford designed it for my set up with the engine. I do love the Autolite and hope it keeps going for years to come, but I think there will come a day when I might need to jump ship and they say that the Summit Carb is the next best thing if you like Autolite Carbs.
Offline
I have the 66 Mustang Ford Shop Manual. It indicates the 'wet' float level should be 0.25" below the level of the main body with the top plate removed.
Send a PM with your email and I'll send you the few pages from the manual of both 'dry' and 'wet' settings.
Online!
I set them the same way I set a Holley float. Turn the carb upside down and set it where float is level with the top surface of the carb. Seems to work perfect every time.
Just another of my methods that does not rely on a chart or instructions.
Offline
I think if I set the floats .25" below the top surface, it would flood. I ended up using the 21/32" measurement and the fuel level sits just below the bypass/overflow. I thought that looked good to me.
Last edited by Toploader (9/10/2021 4:42 AM)
Offline
I think that the umbrella valve is the problem. the valve under the accelerator pump is most likely leaking. Just my 2 Cents
Offline
oldracer17 wrote:
I think that the umbrella valve is the problem. the valve under the accelerator pump is most likely leaking. Just my 2 Cents
I'm pretty certain it was the float valves, but will monitor how things go.
Offline
Always glad to hear positive results
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |