| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
NASCAR changed from 15” wheels/tires to 18” tires and aluminum spoked wheels. Watching the TX race today, I am seeing an awful lot of crashes caused by tire failure.
I wonder if size matters when it comes to failure rate.
Also wondering if the bigger wheels allowed for bigger brakes? I haven’t been paying attention for a couple of years. I read they wanted to make the cars more closely resemble the appearance of showroom cars. I think they did accomplish that.
Offline
This year F 1 went from 13” to 18” .
The change did not cause tire failures but it created “purposing” which took some of the teams quite a few races to solve the problem.
Offline
If the tires remain the same overall size (width and height) I could see that being a problem. Less overall tire to me would mean the possibility that the tires are running hotter, which could certainly lead to more failures. Truth be told that may be what they want. Nothing's changed since Smokey Yunick was running NASCAR. NASCAR want's wrecks. That's why people watch. Its what restrictor plate racing is all about (give all the cars the same power, tighten up the pack, more chance for collisions).
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
If the tires remain the same overall size (width and height) I could see that being a problem. Less overall tire to me would mean the possibility that the tires are running hotter, which could certainly lead to more failures. Truth be told that may be what they want. Nothing's changed since Smokey Yunick was running NASCAR. NASCAR want's wrecks. That's why people watch. Its what restrictor plate racing is all about (give all the cars the same power, tighten up the pack, more chance for collisions).
The way I see NASCAR is it’s a big buck version of demolition derby.
Offline
Rudi wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
The way I see NASCAR is it’s a big buck version of demolition derby.
And a waste of my time anymore! (SAD butt true
)
6sal6
Offline
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
If the tires remain the same overall size (width and height) I could see that being a problem. Less overall tire to me would mean the possibility that the tires are running hotter, which could certainly lead to more failures. Truth be told that may be what they want. Nothing's changed since Smokey Yunick was running NASCAR. NASCAR want's wrecks. That's why people watch. Its what restrictor plate racing is all about (give all the cars the same power, tighten up the pack, more chance for collisions).
Seems that shorter sidewall would mean less flexing and less heat. But they sure were having alot of tire failures.
Offline
MS wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
If the tires remain the same overall size (width and height) I could see that being a problem. Less overall tire to me would mean the possibility that the tires are running hotter, which could certainly lead to more failures. Truth be told that may be what they want. Nothing's changed since Smokey Yunick was running NASCAR. NASCAR want's wrecks. That's why people watch. Its what restrictor plate racing is all about (give all the cars the same power, tighten up the pack, more chance for collisions).
Seems that shorter sidewall would mean less flexing and less heat. But they sure were having alot of tire failures.
My thoughts were less surface area over which to dissipate the heat. However, not sure which is correct. Seems like a question DC would know the answer to...
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
MS wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
If the tires remain the same overall size (width and height) I could see that being a problem. Less overall tire to me would mean the possibility that the tires are running hotter, which could certainly lead to more failures. Truth be told that may be what they want. Nothing's changed since Smokey Yunick was running NASCAR. NASCAR want's wrecks. That's why people watch. Its what restrictor plate racing is all about (give all the cars the same power, tighten up the pack, more chance for collisions).
Seems that shorter sidewall would mean less flexing and less heat. But they sure were having alot of tire failures.
My thoughts were less surface area over which to dissipate the heat. However, not sure which is correct. Seems like a question DC would know the answer to...
Or . . . less surface to flex generating less heat . It must be rocket surgery!🤪
Offline
Get the laser thermometer out and make your way into a pit crew. Inquiring minds want to know!
Offline
I'm only 45 minutes from Dover. 25 years ago I knew the director of motorsports and could probably have hooked that up.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |