FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

12/13/2022 6:39 PM  #26


Re: New 65

Where ya been, Corky?  Ron's new 65 vert and MS's new 65 vert both have Charley Quatro.


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

12/14/2022 11:51 AM  #27


Re: New 65

Bullet Bob wrote:

Where ya been, Corky?  Ron's new 65 vert and MS's new 65 vert both have Charley Quatro.

Thats my point, or are the engines gonna be Bone Stock too??
(notice how I slid an Engine reference in there)

Tubo


If it ain't broke, I haven't modified it Yet
 

12/14/2022 11:55 AM  #28


Re: New 65

Oh....you talkin' 'bout a MOTOR there, Tubo?


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

12/14/2022 2:06 PM  #29


Re: New 65

Tubo wrote:

Bullet Bob wrote:

Where ya been, Corky?  Ron's new 65 vert and MS's new 65 vert both have Charley Quatro.

Thats my point, or are the engines gonna be Bone Stock too??
(notice how I slid an Engine reference in there)

Tubo

Yup Corky - bone stock on mine. I'm very sure that MS couldn't just leave ANY Mustang he has bone stock. :-)
My 65 is an early 65 that was restored back in 1985 by my late brother in law. I bought the car from his estate. My current issue is that he never installed a kickdown rod. I have been chasing parts and asking for pictures if anyone has the same throttle system as I have (see pictures) that could post a picture of the complete system hooked up. Know anyone with at set up like mine?


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/14/2022 4:13 PM  #30


Re: New 65

Have you checked v8 comet, falcon of the 63/64/65 era?

One thing you can eliminate for sure is small block Galaxie of those years.  Its longer.


If multiple things can go wrong, the one that will go wrong will be the one that causes the most damage.
 

12/14/2022 6:12 PM  #31


Re: New 65

Ron, you want my kickdown system?


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
     Thread Starter
 

12/14/2022 9:20 PM  #32


Re: New 65

MS wrote:

Ron, you want my kickdown system?

Quite possibly - once I get the parts I ordered from NPD and install them, I'll have a better idea if the system is going to work for me. I can see that the rod on the carb on your car is different from my Holley linkage setup.
I will know in a week or so if it is going to work.
I can call you when I get a handle on it and we can talk. Thanks.


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/14/2022 9:23 PM  #33


Re: New 65

Greg B wrote:

Have you checked v8 comet, falcon of the 63/64/65 era?

One thing you can eliminate for sure is small block Galaxie of those years. Its longer.

 I know that the 221 that was pulled out to the 65 has that same bellcrank setup as the 289 in it now. I only wish my late brother in law was still around to talk to about how he put it all together. :-(
I will keep that in mind.
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/15/2022 12:01 AM  #34


Re: New 65

Greg B wrote:

Have you checked v8 comet, falcon of the 63/64/65 era?

One thing you can eliminate for sure is small block Galaxie of those years.  Its longer.

 
Here is the bellcrank on the 221 that is identical to the one on the 289.


determine screen resolution


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/15/2022 10:33 AM  #35


Re: New 65

Ron68 wrote:

Greg B wrote:

Have you checked v8 comet, falcon of the 63/64/65 era?

One thing you can eliminate for sure is small block Galaxie of those years. Its longer.

 
Here is the bellcrank on the 221 that is identical to the one on the 289.


determine screen resolution

Wow, a road draft tube!  Haven't seen one of these in a long time. Curious, is the oil filler tube in the timing chain cover?  And is there a small oil fill w/a spring loaded cap on the distributor?
 


65 Fastback, 351W, 5-speed, 4 wheel discs, 9" rear,  R&C Front End.
 

12/15/2022 12:21 PM  #36


Re: New 65

Man, that mess of linkage would make a great SPCC trophy...already has the spark plugs.


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

12/15/2022 2:12 PM  #37


Re: New 65

Bullet Bob wrote:

Man, that mess of linkage would make a great SPCC trophy...already has the spark plugs.

 
Here’s a picture


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/15/2022 2:16 PM  #38


Re: New 65

BobE wrote:

Ron68 wrote:

Greg B wrote:

Have you checked v8 comet, falcon of the 63/64/65 era?

One thing you can eliminate for sure is small block Galaxie of those years. Its longer.

 
Here is the bellcrank on the 221 that is identical to the one on the 289.


determine screen resolution

Wow, a road draft tube!  Haven't seen one of these in a long time. Curious, is the oil filler tube in the timing chain cover?  And is there a small oil fill w/a spring loaded cap on the distributor?
 

Yup. See the picture below on my answer to BB's post (I did it on my phone - really tiny script so I missed quoting your posting)
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/15/2022 11:00 PM  #39


Re: New 65

What I was wondering was if that linkage got changed the same time they made the change to six bolt. 

So that linkage type could be found on anything 5 bolt automatic.


If multiple things can go wrong, the one that will go wrong will be the one that causes the most damage.
 

12/16/2022 1:30 AM  #40


Re: New 65

Greg B wrote:

What I was wondering was if that linkage got changed the same time they made the change to six bolt.

So that linkage type could be found on anything 5 bolt automatic.

Thanks Greg - I will have to Google some pics of that......
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/16/2022 7:48 AM  #41


Re: New 65

I was not aware that the 221 was ever used in the Mustang.  I thought it was finished in 62.  Wikipedia says it was phased out in May '63, 


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

12/16/2022 8:09 AM  #42


Re: New 65

Ford never put a 221 in the Mustang.  260s were rare, and only an early '65 option.  My understanding is that they have tiny bores (like 3.5") severely limiting valve size and thus performance.  I have heard of the occasional Mustang that ended up with a junkyard 221 as a replacement engine for its 260 or 289, because the mechanic either didn't know or didn't care.  It would only bolt in to an early car though, because of the 5 bolt bellhousing, unless they swapped in the trans the engine came with as well.

 

12/16/2022 2:06 PM  #43


Re: New 65

TKOPerformance wrote:

Ford never put a 221 in the Mustang.  260s were rare, and only an early '65 option.  My understanding is that they have tiny bores (like 3.5") severely limiting valve size and thus performance.  I have heard of the occasional Mustang that ended up with a junkyard 221 as a replacement engine for its 260 or 289, because the mechanic either didn't know or didn't care.  It would only bolt in to an early car though, because of the 5 bolt bellhousing, unless they swapped in the trans the engine came with as well.

The car was bought used by my wife's father in 1970. It was her first car. It had been modified somewhat because it had not two, but six tail light assemblies - kinda like a Cougar. It also had the 221 with an early model C4. It was an A Code car, but someone obviously swapped out the engine at least. The transmission was originally listed as for a 1962 Fairlane by the number on the housing. It also had the shifter with the green dot. When my brother in law did the restoration back in 1985 he found a correct year 289 and a C4 that he had modified with the Command Shift valve body (have paperwork on it) and he installed the correct shifter. I have the original shifter for it. He also got rid of the six tail lights and replaced the rear valance.
I've done some looking online at the various throttle bellcrank assemblies for various year Falcons, Comets, Fairlanes, Fords, Mercurys,  etc and have yet to find the exact model bellcrank that I have so that I can see the whole setup in a car.  The search continues..........
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/16/2022 5:00 PM  #44


Re: New 65





As for throttle linkage, mine had the non threaded portion on carburetor end and threaded portion near firewall.  This is a July 65 built in San Jose.

Pay attention to position of the transmission lever.
Lever pushes downward to downshift.
The 66 with a cable pulled the lever forward.

The intake bracket was welded to a plate back in the 90’s.
The original Performer 289 had the rear crossover coolant passage.
The newer version doesn’t have the coolant passage.
So the bell crank had to move rearward to clear the obstruction….or make a new kick down rod.

Last edited by Nos681 (12/16/2022 5:15 PM)

 

12/16/2022 8:06 PM  #45


Re: New 65

Ron I think I got this figured out.  You have a hybrid piece that was modified and put together.   Your bellcrank assembly is Fairlane:  your throttle rod is original Mustang.   What you have missing is obviously the kick down rod,  but what is also missing is the original accerator linkage that went with that particular accerator bellcrank assembly.   What was mated together was the 65 Mustang throttle rod to work with that bell crank.   

Your solution to this is going to be switching it to the pieces MS is offering.   Then its all 65.

Take a look at this.  Look at the Fairlane throttle rod.   When you picture The pieces working together in your mind, and look at your pictures, then you can see how your relative modified the pieces to work.

https://www.2040-parts.com/ford-1963-1964-fairlane-small-block-v8-throttle-linkage-221-260-289-i2155211/


If multiple things can go wrong, the one that will go wrong will be the one that causes the most damage.
 

12/17/2022 1:45 AM  #46


Re: New 65

Greg B wrote:

Ron I think I got this figured out. You have a hybrid piece that was modified and put together. Your bellcrank assembly is Fairlane: your throttle rod is original Mustang. What you have missing is obviously the kick down rod, but what is also missing is the original accerator linkage that went with that particular accerator bellcrank assembly. What was mated together was the 65 Mustang throttle rod to work with that bell crank.

Your solution to this is going to be switching it to the pieces MS is offering. Then its all 65.

Take a look at this. Look at the Fairlane throttle rod. When you picture The pieces working together in your mind, and look at your pictures, then you can see how your relative modified the pieces to work.

https://www.2040-parts.com/ford-1963-1964-fairlane-small-block-v8-throttle-linkage-221-260-289-i2155211/

I think you may be right Greg. I do have an oddball three arm bellcrank that actually does nothing right now. It is welded on to the shaft that the throttle actuating bellcrank rotates on. I do have the rod and arm that Nos681 has pictured. I guess then that what I will need is the actual 65 bellcrank assy and the throttle actuating rod. I'll get hold of MS.... Thanks for bird dogging this for me guys.
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

12/17/2022 7:49 AM  #47


Re: New 65

From what I see on the engine, that appears to be a pre 65 engine.

Is that a 5 bolt or 6 bolt engine block?

Last edited by Nos681 (12/17/2022 7:53 AM)

 

12/18/2022 3:03 PM  #48


Re: New 65

Nos681 wrote:

From what I see on the engine, that appears to be a pre 65 engine.

Is that a 5 bolt or 6 bolt engine block?

I'm pretty sure that it is a 6 bolt, but I haven't looked that closely. The casting number on the intake is a C8 number, so that makes that part at least a 68. I'll have to get a look at the block number when I get some time to crawl under there.
 


68 coupe - 351W, 4R70W, 9" 3.25 -- 65 convertible - 289 4v, C4, 8" 3.00
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.