| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
1 2 Jump to
Offline
Is there any difference in the final result of doing the Mustang Steve DIY drill and weld brake pedal pin relocation vs. buying the bolt-in brake pedal support kit? Is the actual pedal shape (or anything else) different in the bolt-in pedal support kit that you don't get by buying the DIY pin relocate? Trying to determine what the advantages are of buying the bolt-in kit, apart from the easier installation by not having to drill/weld on the brake pedal.
Working on a 1965 Mustang with automatic transmission (stock manual drum brakes, converting to front disc power brakes) and a 302. Already installed a conversion kit from another manufacturer (CSRP), and not happy with the 3" of brake pedal travel needed before getting any response from the brakes down near the floor, so was thinking of converting to the Mustang Steve booster/pedal.
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/15/2021 5:47 PM)
Offline
Welcome to the best Mustang forum.
I can't answer your question on the brackets, but will offer that swapping to disc brakes requires a different master cylinder. Excessive pedal travel may be due to the fact that the disc brake calipers use more fluid then drum brake wheel cylinders to activate braking. Plus, line pressure is considerably higher for disc brakes then drum brakes, so pedal pressure is higher then drum brakes.
Online!
I have never been able to figure out what that bolt on pedal pin setup fits. There is no other booster conversion that fits with the relocated pin other than the MS version.
Maybe someone else has more info. In my opinion, if the pin needs relocating, welding is the proper way to do it. The MS version positions the pin forward so it fits the specific booster. Not sure what the bolt-on version fits.
Offline
BobE wrote:
Welcome to the best Mustang forum.
I can't answer your question on the brackets, but will offer that swapping to disc brakes requires a different master cylinder. Excessive pedal travel may be due to the fact that the disc brake calipers use more fluid then drum brake wheel cylinders to activate braking. Plus, line pressure is considerably higher for disc brakes then drum brakes, so pedal pressure is higher then drum brakes.
Yep, I've actually already installed a conversion kit from another manufacturer (CSRP) that came with a new master cylinder, front disc brakes and booster, just not happy with the brake pedal travel from this setup so looking at switching over to Mustang Steve for a new pedal/booster to change the ratio.
Offline
MS wrote:
I have never been able to figure out what that bolt on pedal pin setup fits. There is no other booster conversion that fits with the relocated pin other than the MS version.
Maybe someone else has more info. In my opinion, if the pin needs relocating, welding is the proper way to do it. The MS version positions the pin forward so it fits the specific booster. Not sure what the bolt-on version fits.
Hi Steve -
Sorry for any confusion, it looks like we might be misunderstanding each other here - I'm probably doing a bad job explaining my question. I was referring to this item on your site: (Automatic Transmission Bolt-In-Kit Pedal Support with Booster for 65-66 Mustang) compared to this item: (Power Brake Conversion For a 65-66 Mustang) paired with your Fox booster:
Basically I'm trying to figure out if there is an advantage to using your bolt-in pedal support PB-5 product vs manually relocating the pedal pin by drilling and welding in with your PB-2 product and pairing that manual pin relocation with your Fox booster? Is the pedal arm (or anything else) different in PB-5 vs. what would be achieved with PB-2 + Fox booster? Is the end result the same using either PB-5 or PB-2 + Fox booster? Is PB-5 just an easier way to achieve the PB-2 + Fox booster setup? I understand for both I would need to drill the new bolt holes in the firewall.
Thanks
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/15/2021 5:57 PM)
Online!
The PB-2 kit accomplishes exactly the same end result. The PB-5 kit is typically sold to those who don’t do their own welding and to shops that would rather just install stuff without having to do any fabrication.
Offline
PB-5 also gets you the sealed bearing pivot as well.
Especially if you ever decide to install a manual transmission later.
Last edited by Nos681 (2/15/2021 10:32 PM)
Offline
MS wrote:
The PB-2 kit accomplishes exactly the same end result. The PB-5 kit is typically sold to those who don’t do their own welding and to shops that would rather just install stuff without having to do any fabrication.
Thanks for the quick response. One more question: The current front power disc brake conversion kit I have installed (from CSRP) has resulted in around 3" of brake travel before there is any feel in the brake pedal and then another 1-2" where you can feel resistance in the pedal and the car actually brakes. Not sure if you're familiar with the kit, but it uses a generic 7" booster, dual bowl MC (I think 1" bore), and does not account for any pedal ratio changes, so the pedal pin is currently still in the stock location and the booster is bolted directly into the existing firewall without any new holes.
Are you able to confirm if your PB-5 product would eliminate this 3" of brake pedal "free play"? It's not a great driving experience when you have no brakes for the first 3 inches, and only get pedal feel / stopping power for the last 1-2" down near the floor. Just too much travel. I'm interested in your product and ditching my current setup, but scared of getting "burned" a second time on power brakes conversion.
Running on a 65 mustang automatic with front disc / rear drum. I've already done a lot of troubleshooting and I'm really at my wits end:
- Master cylinder was bench bled
- Brakes have been bled in order several times
- Brake pedal does not "pump up", further indicating that there's no air in the lines
- Rear drum brakes have been adjusted to slightly drag
- Replaced all brake lines with stainless steel and re-bled everything again
- I was thinking maybe I need a 10-PSI residual pressure valve for rear drum brakes, but the site where I bought the kit claims the master cylinder already has an "integral residual pressure valve" of 10-PSI
- I've checked the booster to master cylinder pushrod length with an adjustable booster gauge tool and the rod length is dead-on (0 - 0.012" gap)
- The kit maker sent me a replacement brake booster, thinking maybe it was a lemon, but the replacement booster has made no difference
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/16/2021 8:33 PM)
Online!
Many customers have used the CSRP disc brake conversion using the MS power brake system with the revised pedal ratio.
Several forum members have them on their car.
Properly set up, it should provide 2” total pedal travel if everything is perfect.
I am always suspect of rear drum brakes being properly adjusted. A “slight drag” is often described. I prefer to adjust the brakes aa tight as can be done, then back off ten clicks.
A “slight drag” will always be felt before the brakes are tight as there is nothing to center the shoes inside the drum except when the brakes are applied. So you can get drag before adjustment is actually achieved.
IF you have them close, and IF your self-adjusters are in good shape, repeated hard braking WHILE IN REVERSE will allow the self-adjusters to take the slack out of the brake system.
Offline
Which master cylinder is being used?
Front/rear lines backwards perhaps?
Offline
MS wrote:
Many customers have used the CSRP disc brake conversion using the MS power brake system with the revised pedal ratio.
Several forum members have them on their car.
Properly set up, it should provide 2” total pedal travel if everything is perfect.
I am always suspect of rear drum brakes being properly adjusted. A “slight drag” is often described. I prefer to adjust the brakes aa tight as can be done, then back off ten clicks.
A “slight drag” will always be felt before the brakes are tight as there is nothing to center the shoes inside the drum except when the brakes are applied. So you can get drag before adjustment is actually achieved.
IF you have them close, and IF your self-adjusters are in good shape, repeated hard braking WHILE IN REVERSE will allow the self-adjusters to take the slack out of the brake system.
Nos681 wrote:
Which master cylinder is being used?
Front/rear lines backwards perhaps?
Front/rear lines are correcly routed and neither are above the MC. I should have been more clear in my rear drum adjustment comment, as I did tighten down all the way and then loosen to just barely drag. However, for completeness I just redid the procedure. I also removed and cleaned up the self-adjusters (just to make sure) and did the repeated hard-stop while reversing procedure. Unfortunately, neither of these had any impact on brake pedal travel distance.
The master cylinder I'm working with right now is what was included in the CSRP kit. Unfortunately no brand given for it, but here are the specs from the site: (Master Cylinder: Iron, 15/16" bore manual (with adjustable push rod) or 1" power, dual reservoir, front disk rear drum, integral residual pressure valve, optional 4 wheel disc type available, 3/8"-24 female flare forward outlet, 7/16"-24 female flare aft outlet). Assume since I'm working with the power conversion kit that it is the 1" bore version.
I just now ordered a Motive pressure bleeder to triple-check that there's no air anywhere in the lines, even though they've been bled multiple times via the 2-man pedal pump method. Will also go ahead and do another bench bleed of the MC before hooking up the pressure bleeder. If those still don't eliminate the travel... guess it's time to order the PB-5? 3" slack in the pedal (total 4-5" travel distance) seems like a lot of slack to have -- not sure if the revised pedal ratio in the PB-5 alone would take up that first 3"? I'm also not sure whether I would need to replace the MC and proportioning valve I already have?
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/17/2021 6:38 PM)
Online!
A bad internal booster valve can cause excessive travel. Through the years we have experience a couple that had to be replaced.
Offline
MS wrote:
A bad internal booster valve can cause excessive travel. Through the years we have experience a couple that had to be replaced.
I do wish it was that! The kit maker sent me a replacement booster thinking the same thing - unfortunately no improvement swapping it out (though it's only a 7" booster, not sure how big a difference that makes).Only thing I can guess at this point is somehow air is still in the lines (Motive pressure bleeder coming in the mail to do another bleed), the pedal ratio problem, or bad MC is also an option I guess. How much slack does the new pedal/relocated pin (PB-5/PB-2) generally take out -- do you often run into folks with this much pedal travel trying to fix it?
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/17/2021 9:13 PM)
Online!
Issues vary widely, usually air entrainment or rear brake issues.
Most bolt the kit in, bleed the brakes and life is good.
The revised ratio pedal with the larger booster is a huge improvement. Harder to install, but works better once completed.
Offline
I did the CSRP brake conversion and ended up going with MS PB 5 kit and now my brakes in my 65 work just like a new car. I took the CSRP booster and we installed it in a 65 C10 with 4 wheel drums and he is supper happy as I am with my 65 mustang. It is as far as I know the only way to make the pedal a shorter throw and MS Fox booster gives you more clearance at the master.
Very happy now
Chris
Offline
Cab4word67 wrote:
I did the CSRP brake conversion and ended up going with MS PB 5 kit and now my brakes in my 65 work just like a new car. I took the CSRP booster and we installed it in a 65 C10 with 4 wheel drums and he is supper happy as I am with my 65 mustang. It is as far as I know the only way to make the pedal a shorter throw and MS Fox booster gives you more clearance at the master.
Very happy now
Chris
That's great news. Were you able to use the master cylinder and/or the proportioning valve from the CSRP kit with the MS PB-5? I'm assuming you were running front disc/rear drum?
Last edited by mustang6518 (2/18/2021 9:37 AM)
Online!
Both kits use exact same 1” disc/drum master cylinder.
Offline
mustang6518 wrote:
Cab4word67 wrote:
I did the CSRP brake conversion and ended up going with MS PB 5 kit and now my brakes in my 65 work just like a new car. I took the CSRP booster and we installed it in a 65 C10 with 4 wheel drums and he is supper happy as I am with my 65 mustang. It is as far as I know the only way to make the pedal a shorter throw and MS Fox booster gives you more clearance at the master.
Very happy now
Chris
That's great news. Were you able to use the master cylinder and/or the proportioning valve from the CSRP kit with the MS PB-5? I'm assuming you were running front disc/rear drum?
Yes I ran all the parts except the booster. And on the C10 we used my dual bowl master for non power that I had recently installed.
Offline
MS wrote:
Many customers have used the CSRP disc brake conversion using the MS power brake system with the revised pedal ratio.
Several forum members have them on their car.
Properly set up, it should provide 2” total pedal travel if everything is perfect.
I am always suspect of rear drum brakes being properly adjusted. A “slight drag” is often described. I prefer to adjust the brakes aa tight as can be done, then back off ten clicks.
A “slight drag” will always be felt before the brakes are tight as there is nothing to center the shoes inside the drum except when the brakes are applied. So you can get drag before adjustment is actually achieved.
IF you have them close, and IF your self-adjusters are in good shape, repeated hard braking WHILE IN REVERSE will allow the self-adjusters to take the slack out of the brake system.
Received the PB-5 kit and installed it today. Didn't get a chance to bleed the brakes yet (planning to do that in the morning), but when I tested the pedal there is a hissing sound that comes from under the dash/at the booster when I depress the brake pedal - is this normal? I didn't have that sound with the previous generic booster so a little worried
Last edited by mustang6518 (3/13/2021 5:28 PM)
Offline
mustang6518 wrote:
MS wrote:
The PB-2 kit accomplishes exactly the same end result. The PB-5 kit is typically sold to those who don’t do their own welding and to shops that would rather just install stuff without having to do any fabrication.
Thanks for the quick response. One more question: The current front power disc brake conversion kit I have installed (from CSRP) has resulted in around 3" of brake travel before there is any feel in the brake pedal and then another 1-2" where you can feel resistance in the pedal and the car actually brakes. Not sure if you're familiar with the kit, but it uses a generic 7" booster, dual bowl MC (I think 1" bore), and does not account for any pedal ratio changes, so the pedal pin is currently still in the stock location and the booster is bolted directly into the existing firewall without any new holes.
Are you able to confirm if your PB-5 product would eliminate this 3" of brake pedal "free play"? It's not a great driving experience when you have no brakes for the first 3 inches, and only get pedal feel / stopping power for the last 1-2" down near the floor. Just too much travel. I'm interested in your product and ditching my current setup, but scared of getting "burned" a second time on power brakes conversion.
Running on a 65 mustang automatic with front disc / rear drum. I've already done a lot of troubleshooting and I'm really at my wits end:
- Master cylinder was bench bled
- Brakes have been bled in order several times
- Brake pedal does not "pump up", further indicating that there's no air in the lines
- Rear drum brakes have been adjusted to slightly drag
- Replaced all brake lines with stainless steel and re-bled everything again
- I was thinking maybe I need a 10-PSI residual pressure valve for rear drum brakes, but the site where I bought the kit claims the master cylinder already has an "integral residual pressure valve" of 10-PSI
- I've checked the booster to master cylinder pushrod length with an adjustable booster gauge tool and the rod length is dead-on (0 - 0.012" gap)
- The kit maker sent me a replacement brake booster, thinking maybe it was a lemon, but the replacement booster has made no difference
I can confirm it. I bought the very same kit you have and installed it on my 65 I had so much travel I didn't know what to do. So I bought MS swing arm kit with the Fox booster and I now have brakes that can put you through the windshield if your not carful. I have never been so happy. I gave my old booster to a friend and installed power drum brakes on his 65 C 10.
Online!
Hissing sound is normal. You are hearing atmospheric pressure entering the booster when the internal valve is opened as the pedal is depressed. Typically this is not noticeable when driving. There is a foam rubber filter on the booster input shaft that usually will deaden the air-rush sound.
Offline
Hi Mustang Steve - I've read through this thread and just wanted to double check a few things before placing an order as i live in the UK so postage and import will be a costly mistake if i get it wrong. I have a 65 fastback 289 auto - it came from the factory (i think) with drums all round, power assisted servo and a single pot MC. I've junked all that as it was all beyond repair -
I've fitted a scott drake front disc kit with servo and dual MC and 4 pot calipers, a rightstuff proportioning valve, a summit rear disc kit. Ive bled everything, adjusted everything, triple checked everything - the brake pedal has way too much travel, its like 2"- 3" off the floor before anything happens.
Am i correct in thinking your pin location kit or pedal and brace kit (PB2 and PB5) will alter the ratio of the pedal and correct the problem? mercedes c class 0 60 mph
Any help much appriciated.
Offline
How about an adjustable MC push rod ?!
6sally6
(at least it got you a bump)
Last edited by 6sally6 (6/06/2023 5:24 PM)
Online!
The revised pedal ratio will reduce the amount of travel but, as in all factory power brake cars in subsequent years, the pedal static position is lower than stock manual brakes. This is by design.
If you have 3” brake pedal travel, you have something amiss. Typically it is caused by the rear brakes. The summit rear disc kit is problematic and the parking brake MUST be installed and adjusted in order to get slack out of the system. Also, adjust the proportioning valve to allow max flow to the rear brakes, just until you get this problem sorted out. Once everything is right, then adjust the proportioning valve so the rears do not skid first. Do NOT do any panic stops until the pads and rotors are bedded.
The ms brake system should result in a max pedal travel of 2” or maybe a little more from static position to a hard pedal.
I would recommend not using the summit rear disc kit. MustangSteve offers better disc kits that utilize Ford calipers.
Offline
I to had pedal travel problems when I did my disc conversion on my 65. Ended up with MS swing pedal conversion and his Fox body MS. Car stops on a dime and with change.
1 2 Jump to
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |