FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

7/11/2023 5:14 PM  #1


Rear Mustang Cobra Caliper Gurus

I have a used set of rear calipers and brackets I am going to try and sell on Craigslist. The receipt states they are for 1994-1998 Mustang Cobra, part #18B4544A and 18B4545A. I thought the rear calipers for 1994-2004 were the same?

Looking at RockAuto.com they have separate caliper/bracket part numbers for:
1994-1998 - Part # 18B4544A and 18B4545A
2001-2004 - Part # 18B4824A and 18B4825A

Looking at the Specs. and Pics. they look the same to me. What is the difference between calipers on those years?

I bought some new powder coated calipers for a 2001 Mustang Cobra from PowerStop part number S4824A. They looked exactly like the ones I took off(except for the Ford logo cast) and they bolted right up.


1966, vert, 347 stroker, T5z, 4 wheel disc, pb, 3.70 LS 9", EPAS
 

7/11/2023 5:47 PM  #2


Re: Rear Mustang Cobra Caliper Gurus

Front calipers 94-98 had smaller pistons than 99-04, and the lettering was inset in a rectangle rather than raised letters.  I have never been aware of any differences between any years on the 94-04 rear cobra calipers. There was one year that had red calipers and they used different threads on the banjo bolts than the grey ones.  Go figure…


Money you enjoy wasting is NOT wasted money... unless your wife finds out.
 

7/11/2023 8:46 PM  #3


Re: Rear Mustang Cobra Caliper Gurus

MS wrote:

Front calipers 94-98 had smaller pistons than 99-04, and the lettering was inset in a rectangle rather than raised letters. I have never been aware of any differences between any years on the 94-04 rear cobra calipers. There was one year that had red calipers and they used different threads on the banjo bolts than the grey ones. Go figure…

I have been finding that it's really hard to tell the difference between 10mm x 1.0 and 3/8" x 24


1966, vert, 347 stroker, T5z, 4 wheel disc, pb, 3.70 LS 9", EPAS
     Thread Starter
 

7/12/2023 7:27 AM  #4


Re: Rear Mustang Cobra Caliper Gurus

KeithP wrote:

MS wrote:

Front calipers 94-98 had smaller pistons than 99-04, and the lettering was inset in a rectangle rather than raised letters. I have never been aware of any differences between any years on the 94-04 rear cobra calipers. There was one year that had red calipers and they used different threads on the banjo bolts than the grey ones. Go figure…

I have been finding that it's really hard to tell the difference between 10mm x 1.0 and 3/8" x 24

 
10mm x 1.0 is .0394”pitch,  3/8 “ x 24 is .0416 pitch .
10mm is .393 diameter compared to .375” for 3/8” x 24.
You can start a 3/8” into 10mm  a few turns but will bind as it advances.
A 10mm bolt might be tighter to start depending on thread class of either component.

Last edited by Rudi (7/12/2023 7:34 AM)


Good work ain't cheap, Cheap work ain't good!   Simple Man
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.