| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I'm curious on what type of mechanical fan you people run on your Mustangs. I still run the standard, original 4 blade fan.
Offline
I run a cut down '70 351w 5 blade fan. Works for me.
Offline
I have a 17" 7 blade fan and thermal clutch that I got at NAPA. Works great.
Offline
74 Maverick 17” flex fan on my 66. The 69 has very similar aftermarket six blade.
Offline
I've been wondering whether I should upgrade to a better fan and need help in knowing whether I should and what is the best.
Some years back I did try a 5 blade fan and was not impressed. The engine developed this odd clicking sound at warm up and believe it or not, it seemed to be the fan. It was the strangest thing... The 5 blade fan was one whacky looking piece of art too 🙄
Offline
Oops sorry I misread the topic and deleted the post.
My fan is direct drive with no thermal clutch
I cut down a Ford 17” 5 blade o/e fan of unknown origin to 15 “ to fit my custom shroud. It’s fitted to a Champion three row aluminum rad, never had any overheating issues at high ambient with a/c on.
Offline
Toploader wrote:
I've been wondering whether I should upgrade to a better fan and need help in knowing whether I should and what is the best.
Some years back I did try a 5 blade fan and was not impressed. The engine developed this odd clicking sound at warm up and believe it or not, it seemed to be the fan. It was the strangest thing... The 5 blade fan was one whacky looking piece of art too 🙄
That 'clicking' could be a loose rivet that holds the fan blade to the hub, or a crack in a blade where it mounts to the hub. Either way, that is not a good sign for anything rotating.
Offline
BobE wrote:
That 'clicking' could be a loose rivet that holds the fan blade to the hub, or a crack in a blade where it mounts to the hub. Either way, that is not a good sign for anything rotating.
Yeah, copy that! 😬
Offline
Other than loss of horsepower and noise, are there any other negatives with changing to a different fan with more blades?
I have considered the clutch type, but am on the fence.
Maybe a 6 blade? Is there an optimum number of blades?
My car was an AC car originally and the fan was still a 4 blade.
Offline
Dumb question but , Is there a fan shroud installed?
Offline
Rudi wrote:
Dumb question but , Is there a fan shroud installed?
Yep, sure does.
Just to clarify... I'm not encountering any overheating problems. I'm just wondering if there's a better fan that I should use.
Offline
I as well as others have been accused of looking for problems when none exist.🤪
Offline
I have a Derail knockoff of what Ford put on the car with 6 or 7 blades. It has a fan clutch too. It does a good job of keeping it cool.
I know they put that 4 blade fan on a lot of cars, but it sure seems like they would have used more blades.
Offline
Maybe I just need to leave well enough alone 😆, but 4 blades seem to not be enough.
Does anyone know what the difference is between the standard 4 blade fan and the hipo 4 blade fan?
Offline
What is up with the "cut down" fan sizes? 17" is standard. Why give up air flow?
Assuming the center 6" of the fan does nothing, a 15" fan covers 149 sq in of area.
A 17" fan covers 199 sq in.
That is a 25% decrease in the amount of swept area of the fan blades by cutting the fan down from 17" to 15". I am just trying to figure out why anyone would want to do that?
Offline
MS wrote:
What is up with the "cut down" fan sizes? 17" is standard. Why give up air flow?
Assuming the center 6" of the fan does nothing, a 15" fan covers 149 sq in of area.
A 17" fan covers 199 sq in.
That is a 25% decrease in the amount of swept area of the fan blades by cutting the fan down from 17" to 15". I am just trying to figure out why anyone would want to do that?
I had a 351w fan when I installed it in my '66. That fan was too wide to fit. It hit the top radiator hose. I wanted to get the car running, so I cut it down to fit. It clears by ~1/2". It worked well, so I never got around to replacing it. It works in 100* freeway traffic. Why replace something that works fine. It also gives me something to talk about with you guys
Offline
Toploader wrote:
Maybe I just need to leave well enough alone 😆.
Does anyone know what the difference is between the standard 4 blade fan and the hipo 4 blade fan?
HiPo idles rougher !
6s6
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |