FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

6/29/2026 12:23 PM  #1


363 flywheel weight.

The aluminum flywheel and pressure plate from the 347 have hot spots, so I am taking them to a surface grinder for evaluation. In the event the components are not serviceable, I looked at flywheels weighing from 11-17 pounds. If I recall correctly, the flywheel that was in the 347 (Victor Jr. intake manifold) was 14 pounds and I wouldn't want to go any heavier than 14 pounds. Anyone have any experience with the 11, 12 or 13 pound flywheels in the first generation Mustangs? The flywheel will be behind a 363 with either a Victor Junior or Super Victor intake manifold.

 

6/29/2026 2:26 PM  #2


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

IME I would not go too light on the flywheel.  You lose inertia when you step on the clutch making the car less fun to drive (constant rev matching).  I have an 11lb flywheel behind a 350 in my '86 IROC and regret it.  IMO the tiny performance advantage of a faster reving engine is more than offset by the chore of how the car has to be driven.  

Too light a flywheel can also lead to idle instability, mystery misfire codes, and stalling when the clutch is pushed in if you run EFI.  I had to adjust the idle compensation table in my Camaro to get it to stop stalling every time I pushed the clutch in when slowing down from a long pull.  I also found out when running a lightweight flywheel in my WRX that it couldn't be machined or it became too light and I had misfire codes and stalling issues.  

I know, I know, not directly "early Mustang" experience, but those experiences led me NOT to run a lightweight flywheel in my '67, or my '89 for that matter.  

 

6/30/2026 6:44 AM  #3


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

I also wouldn’t recommend a light weight flywheel for a street car, unless you’re racing it.  


65 Fastback, 351W, 5-speed, 4 wheel discs, 9" rear,  R&C Front End.
 

7/01/2026 9:03 AM  #4


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

TKO, the 363 will be carbureted so no issues related to fuel injection. The 347 with the 14 pound flywheel worked really well and the 363 produces approximately an 11% gain in both torque and horsepower. At 2500 rpm the 347 made rear wheel numbers of 140 hp and 280 ft lbs. The 363 will do better than that, so I may go with a flywheel lighter than 14 lbs.
 
BobE, in lighter cars I have always used lightweight flywheels. In a 2400 lb car with a built FE 427 and very large tires, the combination worked perfectly. Likewise, the 3200 lb Mustang, 347, with a 14 pound flywheel was a joy to drive. On a heavier car or truck I would definitely be looking at a heavier flywheel, but on this application, I am going to consider a flywheel 13 pounds or below. 
 
Important to note that in conjunction with the 14 pound flywheel, the 347 also had a light weight aluminum clutch pressure plate further reducing inertia. On my cars and motorcycles, within reason, I am always trying to reduce reciprocating and rotating weight. I view it as free horsepower.

I should also note that I cannot use the 347 flywheel as it is externally balanced whereas the 363 is internally balanced. 
 
Thanks for your input and hopefully I can attend a future bash and you can drive the car and comment.

Last edited by boss347convertible (7/01/2026 9:18 AM)

     Thread Starter
 

7/01/2026 5:26 PM  #5


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

My WRX weighs 3,000lbs and has a 13.9 lb flywheel.  Stock is 24.5 lbs.  Its a great combination, but I would not run anything lighter.  That's a turbo motor that spools up fast and winds to 7,000RPM.  The idea that if lighter is better than even lighter must be best may not be true.  I've ruined great combinations that worked well trying to get just a little more before.  It was never worth it.  My $0.02.  

 

7/02/2026 5:28 AM  #6


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

If it works for you, go for it. 


65 Fastback, 351W, 5-speed, 4 wheel discs, 9" rear,  R&C Front End.
 

7/02/2026 3:47 PM  #7


Re: 363 flywheel weight.

I like the way you think..... I'm sure with the right gear ratio (and extra HP) the 'light wheel' would be fun-ner to drive !
6sally6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.