| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I am in the process of getting the Mach 1 road worthy and safe (want to drive it in September). I am spending most of my budget on things that make it safe, reliable, and comfortable to drive for now. My question is the Mach is a 73 with the Q-code 351 Cleveland 4v, and C-6. The car now has a 3.90 gear set in the 9", I have a 3.00 gear set in the garage that I am considering putting in until i can do a AOD swap of some sort. Do you guys think the cleveland will be a complete slug with the 3.00 gears, I know the cleveland's like to wind, but I don't know about down low. When I pull the motor to strip, clean, and paint the engine compartment, I may change the cam to help it out down low. Do I need to leave the 3.90 and just drive 60 mph instead of 75 mph.
Any thoughts, also I am taking it back to mostly stock, I just took off the long tubes that set 3" from the ground, and am putting the stock manifolds and factory dual exhaust set-up on it.
Offline
The first Mustang I ever owned was an M code 70 MACH I with a Cleveland and a 3.0 rear end. That car was plenty fast, but it had a stock cam. It had an FMX tranny... That was in 1974. I traded my 70 Opel Manta straight up to my pastor's son to obtain that car he no longer wanted to put gas in. I seem to remember around 9 MPG.
Later I had a 2V Cleveland in a 70 convertible with 3.0 gears. I swapped the cam to a Crane 272 and a Holey 600. It also had an FMX. Also installed flat top pistons. That car had a ton of torque and would pull really well at expressway speeds.
Just my experience... That FMX tranny did great when there was no such thing as an AOD!
Offline
Thanks Steve,
My goal for my play cars is usally 10 mpg (my F100 w/ CV frontend gets 14 w\351w), maybe a good carb and tune and it will get ten are better. I know this 73 Mach1 is really not worth that much and don't think it ever will be (too bad it's not a 71 351 Boss), but since it's all there and 95% original, it just seems a shame to use anything other than a cleveland based motor. I love the style and lines of the car.
As always thanks for the input.
Offline
I'm betting the 3.00:1 rear would work out great.
If you want to mess with the cam........just degree it and advance it about 4/6 degrees. That will move the torque range down some in the RPM range.
Bet you get MORE than 10MPG!
6sal6
Offline
3.0 to 1 gears???
Nah, 3.25 to 3.55 and use an OD tranny. If your an automatic kinda Dude like me , the 4R70W can't be beat. I have one in each of my Stangs; Miss May 65 2+2 hot rod, and my brothers 73 Vert. Well yeah, I've added stuff he didn't, though I hope he would like what I've done.
Tubo
Offline
Tubo wrote:
3.0 to 1 gears???
Nah, 3.25 to 3.55 and use an OD tranny. If your an automatic kinda Dude like me , the 4R70W can't be beat. I have one in each of my Stangs; Miss May 65 2+2 hot rod, and my brothers 73 Vert. Well yeah, I've added stuff he didn't, though I hope he would like what I've done.
Tubo
Sounded like the OP is going for a strictly street cruiser with the original FMX tranny.. High gears would fill-the-bill.
Offline
A overdrive transmission is something I will do in the future, and will most likely stay with the auto (Have T5's in my others), And I will keep the 3.90's that are in it now for when I can change transmissions. I have to 3.00 gears already set up in anothe third member so it's just a gasket and some gear oil. I only drove this car about ten miles before starting the tear down, but the 3.90's were fun, but I was in third gear at about 20 foot, and turning about 4000 rpm's at 70 mph. So I thinking the 3.00's for now, and then swap back when I have overdrive.
Offline
I would go with the 3.00...for now....jj
Offline
Lots of the 71-73 cars came stock with 3:1 gearing, including my 71. They will work fine.
Having said that, if your only goal is 10 mpg, you can likely do that with your current gears and I know you can do it with 3.50 gears, which is what I run behind a 351C/FMX setup [YMMV with application of your foot].
Offline
All I meant by the 10 mpg, is that while I would like to get a lot better, but I know I must be realistic, and not expect 20mpg. My main concern with the 73 lower compression 351 clevelanv 4v, is it being a dog around town with the 3.00, I 'll give them a try and see how it feels, I want this car to be a nice cruiser with style, and sound, and lots of reliability.
Offline
i drove a 73 thru high school. 351-4v/c6/3.00:1 rear. it sure wouldnt kill anything off the line but did o.k. once you were moving. i miss that car...
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |