| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
1 of 1
Offline
This fast back doesn't look bad to me except for the stance I think if it was lowered it would look nice.
Last edited by True74yamaha (8/16/2015 9:28 PM)
Offline
To me, the styled steel wheel doesn't look good stretched out beyond 15 inches, 16 maximum. The wheelwells are just too small on a 65-66 Mustang for the modern 17in + look. YMMV.
Offline
Muzz 66 wrote:
To me, the styled steel wheel doesn't look good stretched out beyond 15 inches, 16 maximum. The wheelwells are just too small on a 65-66 Mustang for the modern 17in + look. YMMV.
I semi agree on the stretching the wheels out but on this car I kinda like it. If I would've done the smaller kh disc brakes I would be using either magnum 500 or styled Steel wheels. But I have steves gt2008 kit. So I have to use 17" wheels.
Offline
I agree wit Muzz, I like the styled steel wheels but not in 17".
Offline
When CPP first came out with those wheels I noted the backspacing was not really a good fit for its intended fitment on 65-66. Maybe they have remedied that. Wg.hat is the advertised size and backspacing.
The wheels look a bit odd to me but so did Bullitt when they first came out. Now I have them on my car.
You are right about lowering. To me a 17" looks funny unless it is tucked up in the fenders
Offline
Not sure I like them this big.
Last edited by JeffK (8/17/2015 11:14 AM)
Offline
MustangSteve wrote:
When CPP first came out with those wheels I noted the backspacing was not really a good fit for its intended fitment on 65-66. Maybe they have remedied that. Wg.hat is the advertised size and backspacing.
The wheels look a bit odd to me but so did Bullitt when they first came out. Now I have them on my car.
You are right about lowering. To me a 17" looks funny unless it is tucked up in the fenders
The current bs that is offered is 4.75"
Offline
If you were looking at Magnum 500 wheels you might consider American Racing wheels AR 500's. They come in 17" and look right. Don't know if they'll clear the brakes but they'd look really good on a lowered 65-66. They're pricey but you're only gonna buy them once.
Last edited by Jim67FB (8/17/2015 4:56 PM)
Offline
I also agree with these not looking good in 17". They kinda look like plastic wheel covers.
1 of 1
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |