| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
1 of 1
Offline
I have a 190/195 thermostat in my 5.0 66 coupe. T-5, headerz, big a$$ roller cam(I love say'in that!!!) 4 barrel carb with RPM mani. I also have an electric cooling fan(highly recommended by MS I might add)!! It is controlled my a temp controller screwed into the rear plug in my mani. It is 160*. I like the idea of a cooler engine than most recommend because I want no issues with heat since my CR is 9.5:1 or a little higher. Also the cooler engine (I think) will be less likely to cause problems with mid-level fuel if the problem arises(spark knock/detonation). Anywho........are they fighting with each other and I should install a 160* thermostat...or just leave well enough alone?
No problems other than the temp gauge will sometimes go above midway until the fn comes on and cools it BELOW mid way of guage.
What say ye??!!
6s6
Offline
Hummmmmm... you know I can't remember butt......maybe it comes on @ 150* off @ 160*.Regardless...it does cycle off and that is only in stop and go summer weather. Highway and/or cool weather it never comes on.
I guess my question was should I change either the thermostat or the sensor so they BOTH will be the same degree?
Or "let sleeping dogs/ponys lie"?!
6s6
Offline
Sal,
Did you bench bleed your M/C before install.,.......????!!!!
Offline
Running too cold of an engine presents problems of condensation and oil sludging because the oil doesn't get hot enough to flash off the moisture inside the engine.
It will also present more incomplete combustion, since less of the fuel in the air/fuel mix will be ignited and burned and more raw gas will be sent out the exhaust pipes.
If you like power, running a cold engine will not produce as much power as a hotter engine --and I'm not talking hot as in boiling the water out. An engine in the 200° range will produce more horse power than one that's operating at 180°.
The most technologically advanced engines of today are still only about 20-21% efficient. This is because nearly 40% of the gross horse power produced by the engine is lost to the heat being expelled from the combustion chambers and out the tail pipes. Another approximately 40% of an engines total power is lost to the thermal drop inside the combustion chambers, due to the coolant circulating through the passages around the cylinder heads and the cylinder bores (Ideal Gas Law). A hotter combustion chamber/cylinder bore produces a more powerful explosion to thrust the piston downward and to push the crankshaft with a more powerful force.
Offline
FIRST I like the big a$$ roller cam thing but think the 160 stat is way too low. I run a 195 stat and have a calibrated gauge that shows 210 when I am driving "Spiritedly" which is always! I also agree with red351 that your fan will run too much. And agree with ultrastang that you are creating condensation way too much and probably not getting warm enough to boil it off. Unless I am on the track, my car never goes over 210 and usually not over 200. The biggest thing I see with the higher water temp is HORSEPOWER! The dyno confirms it. Higher cylinder wall temps means less of that energy we are paying for at the pumps goes out into the water jacket and helps the gases expand and push harder on the piston tops!! So since I am sending more energy out the driveshaft and less out the radiator I make more rear wheel HP! You gotta remember that the thermostat is actually limiting the energy going out through the radiator even if it is a higher temp. That is because most engines will be more efficient at a higher temp.
Offline
I've gotta agree with Ultra and DC, my 95 engine from the factory runs a 195 stat and the 2 speed doesn't even switch low on till 212.
Now I have fiddled with that in the chip, but not by much.
Offline
OK, I'll play. To answer your question about the Thermostat and the electric fan temp switch fighting each other, no they will not fight each other. The Thermostat will control the water temp even though the fan will be running all the time. Your engine water temp will be 190 as long as the Thermostat is working properly. If it is cool outside the electric fan may subcool the coolant in the radiator, but not in the engine. Typical technique for setting the "turn-on" temp for electric fans is to select a temperature just high enough above the thermostat control temp so that the electric fan will never come on while driving down the road, but will come on in stalled traffic, typically about ten degrees higher than the Thermostat control temp. It is useful to have a good temperature gauge and a little "telltale" light wired into the electric fan run circuit to tell you when the fan is running. If the fan is running during highway driving, keep inching the turnon setting up until the fan no longer runs during highway driving, but still comes on during the 'Stop Light Grand Prix".
Last edited by Hornman (12/07/2016 11:22 AM)
Offline
Sal, I'm scratching my head on this one... It seems to me...
1) If the fan temp switch is "on" at 160, the fan will turn on 35 degrees before your 195 thermostat opens, and will stay on until your engine cools down below 160 (30minutes after you shut down).
2) With the temp switch located in the back of the manifold, the switch is located at the farthest point from the radiator & fan.... I think a better location for a fan temp switch might be in the lower part of your radiator or in the lower hose. Then, you give your radiator a chance to reduce the coolant temp, and if the air moving over the rad is insufficient to reduce the temp in the rad, the switch will kick on the fan. It seems the way it is currently set up, the fan can turn on or off with the switch having no idea of the coolant temp in the radiator.
Are you trying to get MS to chime in on this one????
Offline
Alright....I'll try to change the temp sensor to more closely follow the thermostat.
How does fan ON 5/10* above themostat rating sound?! ex.....190 thermostat.....fan temp sensor on195* off at WHAT temp??!!!
6s6
Offline
It would be more like ON at 200, OFF at 195. You have to keep enough spread between the OFF setting and the Thermostat operating range or the electric fan will never turn off after it is triggered on.
Offline
Hornman wrote:
It would be more like ON at 200, OFF at 195. You have to keep enough spread between the OFF setting and the Thermostat operating range or the electric fan will never turn off after it is triggered on.
This is with a 190* thermostat...correct?!
6s6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Hornman wrote:
It would be more like ON at 200, OFF at 195. You have to keep enough spread between the OFF setting and the Thermostat operating range or the electric fan will never turn off after it is triggered on.
This is with a 190* thermostat...correct?!
6s6
Correct.
Offline
Limited info to go on. You still haven't said if you're using an adjustable proportioning valve or not.
Offline
Sal, I'm a proponent of the 160 thermostat also, and my e-fan is set to come on at 185 and go off at 170. My experience has been that it's better to start managing heat early rather than late. And all a thermostat does is allow you to start managing heat. The system will run at whatever temperature that combo dictates.
Offline
Hey Jimi!!! Welcome to da forum!!
Soooooo it looks like me and you pal!!
No seriously....How has the lower temps(160*) worked for you? Any sludge build up issues?
What kind of set-up do you have?!! 5.0......351......FE?
6saly
Offline
The primary purpose of a radiator isn't to cool an engine but is to keep the engine at optimal operating temperature. The thermostat is the 'brains' for maintaining this optimal temperature.
The temperature rating stamped on the thermostat isn't the figure at which the thermostat will be fully open. It's the cracking temperature --the point at which it will start opening. The wax motor won't drive the thermostat to being fully open until the water temperature has risen 20° above what's stamped in the thermostat.
Offline
ultrastang wrote:
The primary purpose of a radiator isn't to cool an engine but is to keep the engine at optimal operating temperature. The thermostat is the 'brains' for maintaining this optimal temperature.
The temperature rating stamped on the thermostat isn't the figure at which the thermostat will be fully open. It's the cracking temperature --the point at which it will start opening. The wax motor won't drive the thermostat to being fully open until the water temperature has risen 20° above what's stamped in the thermostat.
WAX MOTOR?..You lost me Ultra
6s6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
ultrastang wrote:
The primary purpose of a radiator isn't to cool an engine but is to keep the engine at optimal operating temperature. The thermostat is the 'brains' for maintaining this optimal temperature.
The temperature rating stamped on the thermostat isn't the figure at which the thermostat will be fully open. It's the cracking temperature --the point at which it will start opening. The wax motor won't drive the thermostat to being fully open until the water temperature has risen 20° above what's stamped in the thermostat.WAX MOTOR?..You lost me Ultra
6s6
There's a wax pellet inside the thermostat assembly that as the coolant heats up the thermostat, the wax expands and pushes the piston of the thermostat open, to allow the water to circulate. As it cools off, the wax contracts and the poppet reduces the opening or closes off.
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Hey Jimi!!! Welcome to da forum!!
Soooooo it looks like me and you pal!!
No seriously....How has the lower temps(160*) worked for you? Any sludge build up issues?
What kind of set-up do you have?!! 5.0......351......FE?
6saly
Sal, I've been a member here for some time, but don't normally post much.
I'm running a 331 inch smallblock, aluminum heads, 10.5-1 compression, Hilborn stack EFI injection with Holley ECU, ahead of a TKO600 and a 9" with 3.89 gears, all in a 1965 fastback with a .565/571 lift roller cam.
I'm not worried about sludge as my car only sees about 2-3K miles per year and that's with two oil changes per year. Maintenance is your friend.
I've always found cooling issues to be one of two things, insufficient air flow, (indicated by temperature creep at low speeds, but acceptable temps at highway speed), or insufficient cooling capacity, indicated by temps staying at higher levels. Now keep in mind that higher levels and too cool are subjective and everyone has their own opinion. I run a 160 stat and am happy with it. Others are happy with 180 or 195 stats, go for it.
Most drag racers that I know like to enter the burn box at around 170 degrees. The dyno operators I know like to start the pull at a minimum temp of 170 or 180. The higher temps encountered from 70's to current is to lower the amount of emissions, not to increase performance. A hotter chamber will burn cleaner.
Offline
Jimj wrote:
6sally6 wrote:
Hey Jimi!!! Welcome to da forum!!
Soooooo it looks like me and you pal!!
No seriously....How has the lower temps(160*) worked for you? Any sludge build up issues?
What kind of set-up do you have?!! 5.0......351......FE?
6salySal, I've been a member here for some time, but don't normally post much.
I'm running a 331 inch smallblock, aluminum heads, 10.5-1 compression, Hilborn stack EFI injection with Holley ECU, ahead of a TKO600 and a 9" with 3.89 gears, all in a 1965 fastback with a .565/571 lift roller cam.
I'm not worried about sludge as my car only sees about 2-3K miles per year and that's with two oil changes per year. Maintenance is your friend.
I've always found cooling issues to be one of two things, insufficient air flow, (indicated by temperature creep at low speeds, but acceptable temps at highway speed), or insufficient cooling capacity, indicated by temps staying at higher levels. Now keep in mind that higher levels and too cool are subjective and everyone has their own opinion. I run a 160 stat and am happy with it. Others are happy with 180 or 195 stats, go for it.
Most drag racers that I know like to enter the burn box at around 170 degrees. The dyno operators I know like to start the pull at a minimum temp of 170 or 180. The higher temps encountered from 70's to current is to lower the amount of emissions, not to increase performance. A hotter chamber will burn cleaner.
Good info!!
Thanx
6s6
1 of 1
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |