| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I think autonomous vehicles have their place, but obviously it's going to take a while to perfect and adapt. No doubt there's growing pains in both tech and infrastructure along with having to adapt to the way people drive nowadays. I feel bad for the system that has to deal with Dallas drivers... Give me robots over them any day!
One thing I do like is "assisted" driving. Meaning something that helps avoid collisions or drowsy/distracted driving, situations like that is where it shines IMO. And yes I know people shouldn't be texting or eating or reading or knitting sweaters while driving, but they do...
Offline
Raymond_B wrote:
One thing I do like is "assisted" driving. Meaning something that helps avoid collisions or drowsy/distracted driving, situations like that is where it shines IMO. And yes I know people shouldn't be texting or eating or reading or knitting sweaters while driving, but they do...
I don't like the idea of the computer braking for me.
1. That means that it must be using brake-by-wire. I still prefer a manual connection between my brake booster and pedal.
2. What happens when the sensor fails and it suddenly decides to slam on the brakes for no reason when I'm going 70 down the interstate?
Offline
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Could THIS be classified as...."sensor failure"??!!
6s6
Offline
Looks like someones daydreamin' bout warmer places.
110 today in Brisbane ...... not the hottest of places either!
Call ya tomorrow.
Offline
Raymond_B wrote:
I think autonomous vehicles have their place, but obviously it's going to take a while to perfect and adapt. No doubt there's growing pains in both tech and infrastructure along with having to adapt to the way people drive nowadays. I feel bad for the system that has to deal with Dallas drivers... Give me robots over them any day!
One thing I do like is "assisted" driving. Meaning something that helps avoid collisions or drowsy/distracted driving, situations like that is where it shines IMO. And yes I know people shouldn't be texting or eating or reading or knitting sweaters while driving, but they do...
Oh you spoiled guys from Texas. Nothing can be as bad as Massachusetts. Nothing.
Offline
Michael H. wrote:
Raymond_B wrote:
One thing I do like is "assisted" driving. Meaning something that helps avoid collisions or drowsy/distracted driving, situations like that is where it shines IMO. And yes I know people shouldn't be texting or eating or reading or knitting sweaters while driving, but they do...
I don't like the idea of the computer braking for me.
1. That means that it must be using brake-by-wire. I still prefer a manual connection between my brake booster and pedal.
2. What happens when the sensor fails and it suddenly decides to slam on the brakes for no reason when I'm going 70 down the interstate?
I *generally* trust the OEM implementations of items like these, and I imagine if properly engineered a failure would result in no action rather than action. I also do not think collision avoidance would require braking by wire. But sure anything is possible I guess, heck an airbag could go off in your face, a computer controlled trans could go in to 1st, anti-lock could go haywire, aliens could EMP us, etc, etc.
Offline
Raymond_B wrote:
... aliens could EMP us...
Don't be silly... It'll be the Russians or the Chinese who EMP us...or maybe North Korea... But hey, my old mustang will still run after the EMP (once I install the points and condensor back in the distributor cause the pertronix will most likely be fried by the EMP).
Offline
Michael H. wrote:
Raymond_B wrote:
... aliens could EMP us...
Don't be silly... It'll be the Russians or the Chinese who EMP us...or maybe North Korea... But hey, my old mustang will still run after the EMP (once I install the points and condensor back in the distributor cause the pertronix will most likely be fried by the EMP).
Ha, very true! You know I remember some discussion somewhere talking about "hardened" military vehicles setup to minimize the effects of an EMP. Someone pointed out how a huge part of the Russian military was very old and without electronics and in that case was at an advantage.
Offline
It doesn't require braking by wire. A lot of current ABS systems can already brake without pedal input. That's how those autostopping cars work. I saw a show where a guy hacked a Jeep and made it stop from his tablet. He was able to make it drive forward and backup as well.
Offline
I saw a comic in yesterdays paper. Nascar was meeting and said driverless cars would be great, wouldn't have to pay any drivers for winning.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
It doesn't require braking by wire. A lot of current ABS systems can already brake without pedal input. That's how those autostopping cars work. I saw a show where a guy hacked a Jeep and made it stop from his tablet. He was able to make it drive forward and backup as well.
Fair enough... but, as you said, it can be hacked and sensors fail (usually at the most inconvenient time). I don't have a problem with people having them, but I don't want one.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |