| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
This might be a topic worth discussing, or maybe setting up a database of ethanol free gas stations.
Not too far from where I live, Murphy's gas in San Marcos (in Texas, they are partnered with Walmart) has 87 octane ethanol free gas but it's a little pricey, at $2.80 per gallon when unleaded 87 is $2.54 (yesterday driveby). I put a tank in my 016 Ford Edge and saw a 1.25 mpg improvement (on the fly recalibration of the ECU by adjusting the fuel mixture to allow for the different btu fuel).
Also, there is a current radio ad that is pushing for the government to make E-15 available, by putting US corn growers back to work. I am a flag waving patriot but I am also very familiar with engine and combustion processes. I have seen the damage done by ethanol, at levels advertised at 10% or less, just imagine what another adding 5%+ would do. Frankly I dont see the benefit for our farmers, plus the fact that ethanol production is barely if at all cost effective, its mostly subsidized. Most of the proponents of E15 are the ethanol producers.
Ok, off the soap box for now.
Offline
I think non-ethan fuel is MORE available along the coast because.........off shore boats and such. I mean...who wants to be 50 miles off shore and your engine crud-out because you put ethanol gas in it?!!! Can't walk to get more gas or call AAA for a tow when your possibly on the buffet line for Jawz!
I use it .....because its cheap (and so am I!) butt..if it was done away with, I think gasoline prices would settle back down to where ethanol "laced" gas is now.
6sal6
PS...........I miss the days when gas smelled GOOD going into the tank and didn't stink coming out of the exhaust!!
Offline
This site has lists for every state, no idea of the acuracy.
Offline
The Buccee’s in Katy sells Erhanol free gas too.
Offline
2.89 here for the low grade with 10% ethanol. You guys in Tx got it nice with fuel.
Offline
I've started buying ethanol free fuel for all of my small gas engines (I got tired of replacing carbs every couple years in the small engines). Unfortunately, there is no where in my state where it is sold at the pump, so my options are the local FBO airport or marinas. Excpet for the price, the airport works out well. I pick up 20 or 25 gallons at a time. Nothing like the smell of high octane AV gas when you're running the leaf blower.
Last edited by Chaplin (5/31/2018 9:15 PM)
Offline
how is funny have 7 usd for a gallon here in italy ..... 100 dollars you filled mustang tank one time
Offline
Alessandro wrote:
how is funny have 7 usd for a gallon here in italy .....
100 dollars you filled mustang tank one time
OUCH
I fill my mustang for 30 bucks .. that is crazy .. even my exepdition with 30 gallon tank doesnt get to a 100. There was a time few years ago when prices got to 3.50 or 3.99 a gallon here in Texas, and it was a meltdown! LOL
Offline
Well, 87 is above $3/gallon here with 10% ethanol. I don't known of any station around here anymore that sells ethanol free. I've been wondering about setting up a large storage tank and having it delivered, wondering if I can buy it that way like 500-1,000 gallons at a shot.
I paid $5.15/gallon for Diesel years back when it was out of control, and that was across the line in MD where fuel was like $0.20/gallon cheaper than in DE. Took $165 to fill my F250's tank.
Offline
Around here the Alon stations don't advertise it but their Premium unleaded is ethanol-free. It is marked 91 octane on the pump and the stations with 10% ethanol Premium are marked 93 octane. Alon's Premium is always $.50 higher than their Regular so it is currently $3.10/gal.
Offline
Wow, now they're using the ethanol of increase research octane. Ethanol essentially won't detonate, so I guess 10% increases RO by 2 points.
I've got a friend who's fiance lives in Brazil. The last time he was there he said it cost $150 to fill up a Volkswagon. I'm guessing gas is like $11 or more per gallon based on that.
Offline
You could move to Venezuela where gas is 18 cents a gallon!
In Canada taxes make up a big part of the cost, all taxes are compounded meaning that we pay tax on tax. .
Offline
The last time I filled up my 1964 VW Beetle, gas was twenty two cents a gallon!!! That was in 1972, the day I totaled it.
Offline
I suppose we do have to remember that everything is relative. Gas was I seem to remember like $0.10-$0.15/gallon in the '60s, but a new Mustang was also less than $3,000. I think my grandfather said the house they lived in when I was growing up cost $5,000, and it was all brick!
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
I suppose we do have to remember that everything is relative. Gas was I seem to remember like $0.10-$0.15/gallon in the '60s, but a new Mustang was also less than $3,000. I think my grandfather said the house they lived in when I was growing up cost $5,000, and it was all brick!
I think minimum wage was $1.25 per hour too!!
6s6
Offline
Yeah, you're right on with that suspicion. It's misleading spin and lobbying. The economics of ethanol on the gas without gov subsidy doesn't pan out. It is actually a net negative in total fossil fuel burn (and cost). The reason it's cheaper at the pump is government subsidies to farmers. Gov pays farmers to produce to give then some scratch and to keep food prices down, then as a result process and sell the ethanol from the overproduction to get somewhat of a return.
Last edited by Big Tag (6/06/2018 8:27 PM)
Offline
Yep, its a stupid system. It makes our vehicles less efficient, and they get worse fuel economy as a result. Large portions of the world are starving, yet we pay our farmers to produce something we don't need.
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
I suppose we do have to remember that everything is relative. Gas was I seem to remember like $0.10-$0.15/gallon in the '60s, but a new Mustang was also less than $3,000. I think my grandfather said the house they lived in when I was growing up cost $5,000, and it was all brick!
I think minimum wage was $1.25 per hour too!!
6s6
$1.25 in the 60's , I remember those good old days Mike.
When I graduated high school on 1957 I got a job at Union Carbide in the machine shop that paid $0.45 an hour.
Offline
Yeah, remember that E85 fad? Turns out when they shifted the production that far, the absolute value of the
inefficiencies and costs could not be hidden anymore. Like that it uses more fossil fuels to make ti than was
being saved. And the $. And as TKO gets at with starving people out - the other effect was it drove up corn
prices. In the U.S. that could largely be absorbed by consumers. But in places like Mexico and Central America
where $ is a LOT tighter, and corn makes up a larger % of diet, it had a real negative impact on peoples'
dinner tables. What is very interesting though, is how in countries like Brazil using a different organic
feedstock, the idea of high-ethanol gas being a net-savings actually does work out. We're just too obsessed
with pushing corn subsidies. So if we can't do it with corn, no one cares enough since it's not in their
short-term interests. Yeah you get worse mileage and the engines don't run quite as well, but if it's net savings
even with the lost mileage, and why do Toyota Camrys need 200+ HP, then why not go for it? And leave the good
stuff for us?
And then notice how quietly E85 just faded into the mist?
Offline
In developing nations ethanol is a viable fuel, often more viable than petroleum based fuel, unless they actually have large petroleum deposits that can be used, but even then they often don't have the infrastructure to refine and dispense gasoline or Diesel fuel.
What they do have is agrarian economies and cheap labor. That's why ethanol works there. In the US labor is too expensive, and adversely impacts the cost of ethanol. There are different ways to produce ethanol, and the idea of using biomass for example instead of a footstuff as a feedstock is intriguing just from a save space in landfills perspective if nothing else, but everything I've read on it claims the process is too inefficient, and again we end up upside down in terms of both cost and fuel used.
The cars today need so much power because they are pigs. Look at how big everything is now. A Honda Civic from the '90s would fit in the trunk of a Honda Civic from today. All this techno crap in cars just ads weight, plus Americans just keep getting fatter and need more room. In other countries they have compact Diesel powered vehicles that get between 50 and 100mpg, but we won't import them because of crash standards, etc., etc., etc. Really? A Smart Car is safer than one of those? I smell something...I think its Bull@%$^!
Offline
The corn grown for ethanol can' be used for food or feed because of the herbicides used on the corn! They grow "Round-up ready" corn which is.....corn that is NOT effected by Round-Up herbicide. That stuff(for you non-grower folks) will kill ANYTHING that is green! BUTT......Round-up ready corn& soybeans are genetically altered to NOT die when in contact with Round-up. Round-up ready corn IS "eatible"(so THEY say!) butt it has no flavor. Just bland substance in your mouth.
Prolly take a while to get that "type" of corn out-of-the-system(no pun) before eatible corn could be grown for export/eating.
Jus say'in
6s6
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |