| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I understand the purpose of EGR.
Especially the reason back in the day.
EFI can control and monitor via feedback with multiple wideband O2 sensors.
Depending on exhaust, it can tweak it until it’s clean.
Why still have the system?
Offline
Well...even if the engine tune is perfect and reduces emissions to the minimum, there is still some. So, by using EGR during steady state cruise the effective size of the engine is reduced by inserting inert gasses into the cyl. So that further reduces the amount of emissions for any given engine size. Also, and I have proven this for myself, EGR increases MPG by making the engine "smaller". When I had EGR on the stock engine, the MPG was easily 24-25. Then I went to the Explorer intake and removed EGR. MPG dropped to 22. And, according to Probst,EGR does not affect performance since it is not allowed by the computer during WOT operation, and he wrote the book....literally! It is ugly though so if you decide to remove it I'll send you the simple skizzy for the EGR Position Sensor eliminator to keep the PCM happy. EGR Vac Reg. gets a 75 ohm resistor like the Secondary Air valves or Canister Purge if removed.
BB1
Last edited by Bullet Bob (4/08/2020 2:38 PM)
Offline
The actual purpose of EGR is mostly misunderstood. Its an emissions device, but its actually so much more than that. The primary goal of EGR was to reduce NOx emissions. NOx are worse the higher the compression ratio a vehicle has, and EFI vehicles with typically wide LSA cams have a higher dynamic compression than typical carbed engines, so NOx went up on them even as other emissions went down.
What people don't understand is how it does this, and this plays into what BB is noting about mileage. By introducing exhaust gas, which is for all intents and purposes chemically inert, into the chamber the cylinder becomes effectively smaller. This allows the use of what would otherwise be impossibly lean AF ratios.
Again, people think mileage went up, power must be down, or this somehow hurts performance. Dead wrong. Thing is, EGR only works during a steady state engine operation, basically, while cruising. During throttling, idle, etc. it doesn't work, because it can't. Trying to use EGR under those conditions would stall the engine or prevent acceleration. This is why the early systems used vacuum.
There's zero downside to running EGR on a gas engine (I'll spare you my tirade about what it can do to Diesels), and in fact you will likely see a modest MPG increase.
Offline
Most people will tell you to just delete the entire EGR system. They sell EGR delete kits. These cars are way past the age of having to pass emission inspections so it's fine to remove it.
However, keep in mind the engineers who designed these cars didn't thrown in extra components for no reason. All the systems in your car are designed to work together and efficiently from the factory. I don't have the EGR system in my 5.0 MAF, EFI setup. Likewise, there will be a permanent code but the effect would be very hard to measure regardless.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |