| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I don't know much about these engines, but wow! The horsepower documented in the articles below are quite impressive;
Here are some YouTube videos of a guy in Texas that removed a V8 and replaced with an Australian built inline 6;
What do you guys think?
Offline
I've heard of people swapping the Barras, very interesting.
Offline
There was an episode of Hot Rod Garage or some such where on a challenge from some Aussies they built a GM 4200 straight six with a turbo and made over 400HP. It was intended to compete with the Barra.
Sure, its interesting, but once you start turbo charging engines the size of the engine and its number of cylinders really no longer matters. America has just always been a V8 culture ever since the flathead brought an affordable V8 to the masses. In other countries there are tons of 6 cylinders that make amazing power. The Toyota 2JZ used in the Supra is a beast routinely built to 1,000HP while still being reliable. Nissan had the 26DETT used in the Skyline (a car we never got in the states until the recent Infiniti G series based version). The Skyline GT-R was said to be the only supercar ever to come out of Japan by the guys on Top Gear, and many have called it the best handling car they've ever driven.
Offline
Call me weird butt........"Did you see that ad for cleaning ear wax"!!? WOW!
Sic cylinder anything in a Mustang?!......Ehh
6sal6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
Call me weird butt........"Did you see that ad for cleaning ear wax"!!? WOW!
Sic cylinder anything in a Mustang?!......Ehh
6sal6
Sal - once again, LOL
Online!
Fordsix.com has had threads on the Barra and also the six cyl SOHC head swap for years. Pretty cool stuff those Ozzies have to play with. Last Barra I saw for sale in the US was $1,800.
I'd have figured Barry would've brought one over to a Bash in his suitcase by now.
Last edited by Bearing Bob (1/10/2021 12:00 PM)
Offline
I remember reading about a 1000hp Barra on gas not petrol.
It was orange....and from Victoria ( license plate) as I recall. It is a long engine to stuff into a 65.
I couldn’t find the article online today.
Last edited by Nos681 (1/10/2021 11:23 PM)
Offline
I wouldn't rip my 289 out for one of these engines, BUT... If I bought a 6 cylinder Mustang, then I surely would give it one of these 6 cylinders. Power output is incredible...
Offline
^^^^^^^^This still "trips-my-trigger" as far as 6 cylinder stuff goes!^^^^^^^^^
Old skool fer sure.
That Aussie 6 IS impressive no doubt.
The above vid with the 6 in a 69 I kinda liked. 'Long-legged' gear fer sure-fer sure
(that's my west coast impression talk)! You know.........'bi-itch;in!
6s6
Last edited by 6sally6 (1/11/2021 1:26 PM)
Offline
yes 6=8 you know
Offline
I can make 4 equal 8 if I want to. Its just a case of how many times atmospheric pressure I need to cram into the cylinders. A 2.5 liter 4 cylinder running 14.7psi of boost is going to make the same power as a 5.0 V8 running NA all other things being equal. The 2.0 in my WRX made 227HP stock in '02. Compare that to the 225HP the 5.0 HO made in my Mustang in '89. Hence my comparison that the WRX was the 5.0 of the import scene. Cheap, fast, and handled well (truthfully the WRX handles a lot better than a 5.0 due to the AWD). It also legitimized real imports performance to the masses, much the same as the 5.0 legitimized that muscle was back and EFI was more help than hindrance to performance. Cool is cool and fast is fast. Brand loyalty forsaking all others has never been appealing to me.
Offline
I have been very happy with the 310 hp of the v-6 in my 2016 Mustang. However, it is very blah....it just cannot compete with the raw feel of my 390 in my Gal. The whole car just rumbles in a manly pleasing way. Even though in a straight up drag race the Mustang would probably kick it's arse. I think I finally understand what Lance was trying to describe when he was converting from a six to a v8.
Offline
Greg B wrote:
....it just cannot compete with the raw feel of my 390 in my Gal. The whole car just rumbles in a manly pleasing way. Even though in a straight up drag race the Mustang would probably kick it's arse. .
With "some" gear and wide enough tires I bet it would be a different story.
("some"....as in eyeball flattening!!!!
6s6)
Offline
There's just something raw and unrefined about a carbureted musclecar. The old engines are typically lucky if they made half the power a modern one does (not counting the real high performance stuff, just the run of the mill V8s), but there's two things about the way a musclecar makes that power. First, low end torque was still prized in those cars. They were only a couple decades removed from when the measure of a car was if it would pull a hill in high gear. Low end torque shreds tires and puts you back in the seat.
Second, EFI provides linear fueling. It acts like a big 2V carb. A 4V by contrast has a big hit when those back barrels come in that provides a seemingly instant increase in power and pins you back in the seat. We perceive the power delivery in an EFI vehicle differently because its smooth.
In the end, things that feel like they are on the edge of being out of control feel the fastest. Its why the butt dyno is totally inaccurate. The old saying is slow is smooth and smooth is fast. Its 100% accurate. When you race you'll notice this phenomenon. Your runs that feel the slowest typically return the fastest times. The car hooked at the line instead of spinning. The shifts went smooth. The car stayed in its lane without a fight for control. It just went A to B as they say. Yet if everything were reversed it would feel like a fast run. That's the primary difference between old cars and new.
Offline
Bearing Bob wrote:
Fordsix.com has had threads on the Barra and also the six cyl SOHC head swap for years. Pretty cool stuff those Ozzies have to play with. Last Barra I saw for sale in the US was $1,800.
I'd have figured Barry would've brought one over to a Bash in his suitcase by now.
They don't fit the overhead lockers.
With the end of locally produced cars, comes the end of Aussie innovation. no more stuff like Aussie Clevelands, and DOHC crossflow 250 sixes. No more Barras. It was a good time to be a petrol head.
Offline
50vert wrote:
Bearing Bob wrote:
Fordsix.com has had threads on the Barra and also the six cyl SOHC head swap for years. Pretty cool stuff those Ozzies have to play with. Last Barra I saw for sale in the US was $1,800.
I'd have figured Barry would've brought one over to a Bash in his suitcase by now.They don't fit the overhead lockers.
With the end of locally produced cars, comes the end of Aussie innovation. no more stuff like Aussie Clevelands, and DOHC crossflow 250 sixes. No more Barras.It was a good time to be a petrol head.
Progress I guess!?
6s6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
50vert wrote:
Bearing Bob wrote:
Fordsix.com has had threads on the Barra and also the six cyl SOHC head swap for years. Pretty cool stuff those Ozzies have to play with. Last Barra I saw for sale in the US was $1,800.
I'd have figured Barry would've brought one over to a Bash in his suitcase by now.They don't fit the overhead lockers.
With the end of locally produced cars, comes the end of Aussie innovation. no more stuff like Aussie Clevelands, and DOHC crossflow 250 sixes. No more Barras.It was a good time to be a petrol head.
Progress I guess!?
6s6
Sounds like globalization to me. I sure don't call that progress, well, unless you consider moving backward progress...
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
6sally6 wrote:
50vert wrote:
They don't fit the overhead lockers.
With the end of locally produced cars, comes the end of Aussie innovation. no more stuff like Aussie Clevelands, and DOHC crossflow 250 sixes. No more Barras.It was a good time to be a petrol head.
Progress I guess!?
6s6Sounds like globalization to me. I sure don't call that progress, well, unless you consider moving backward progress...
Uhhhhhhhhh. ............"tongue-in-cheek." (shoulda made it clear.)
Of course its globalization!! "WE" and the rest of the world are selling out for cheaper-is-better idea. Walmart mentality at the cost of quality/jobs/workmanship/innovation...you name it.
OK.........DONE!
6s6
Offline
6sally6 wrote:
TKOPerformance wrote:
6sally6 wrote:
Progress I guess!?
6s6Sounds like globalization to me. I sure don't call that progress, well, unless you consider moving backward progress...
Uhhhhhhhhh.
............"tongue-in-cheek." (shoulda made it clear.)
Of course its globalization!! "WE" and the rest of the world are selling out for cheaper-is-better idea. Walmart mentality at the cost of quality/jobs/workmanship/innovation...you name it.
OK.........DONE!
6s6
I so want to say MUCH more, but I already know we are on the same wavelength and this isn't the forum (hah) for it. I'll refrain.
Offline
1200 HP out of these engines seems to be commonly reported on a lot of sites I am seeing.
Offline
1000 HP is common, 2000 HP is extreme.
Offline
50vert wrote:
1000 HP is common, 2000 HP is extreme.
Which seems to be a lot better than most V8 engines?
Offline
They are using turbos to achieve that power. These are also basically racing applications. There are tons of turbo V8s making 1,000HP, and serious ones in racing are more in the 3,000-3,500 range.
Now it says that the basic engine architecture of the Barra is stout because the stock blocks, etc. can live through that power. But built the same way, a V8 is going to make more power, and be considerably cheaper to build.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |