FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What Master Cylinder to run on a street rod project? » 11/05/2024 11:36 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 5

Go to post

MS wrote:

The engagement depth on the 2000 Mustang v6 non traction control master cylinder is 1” exactly like a Mustang 65-73 would have.

Thank You. 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What Master Cylinder to run on a street rod project? » 10/30/2024 12:58 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 5

Go to post

MS wrote:

cj428mach wrote:

I'm hoping for some help here, I have a 37 Ford that had S197 front disc, and explorer rear disc brakes, with a brake booster and corvette 1 1/8" master cylinder. I'm godzilla swapping it and also had to modifiy the frame Xmember for more room which doesn't provide room for the brake booster anymore. I also swapped in a stock set of 1940 Ford hydraulic clutch/brake pedals. 

This leaves me looking for a manual brake master cylinder for disc/disc, I assume a 1" bore, with the ports on the opposite side of vintage mustangs/ford.  

Your description of the required master cylinder could be a Corvette unit from 1967 or a 2000 Mustang V6, non traction control unit.

Thanks for the information. I think the aluminum one I have now is based off the corvette one and is rather bulky through out the body. The 2000 Mustang v6 one is intriquing because I actually have a 99-04 Mustang v6 parts car. How would I deal with the issue of the depth of the pushrod in the piston? I assume since its a power master cylinder that the bore for the push rod isn't very deep or am I wrong on this? I may have to pull it off tonight and investigate. Do these newer style master cylinders have residual valves?

Thank you
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What Master Cylinder to run on a street rod project? » 10/30/2024 7:53 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 5

Go to post

I'm hoping for some help here, I have a 37 Ford that had S197 front disc, and explorer rear disc brakes, with a brake booster and corvette 1 1/8" master cylinder. I'm godzilla swapping it and also had to modifiy the frame Xmember for more room which doesn't provide room for the brake booster anymore. I also swapped in a stock set of 1940 Ford hydraulic clutch/brake pedals. 

This leaves me looking for a manual brake master cylinder for disc/disc, I assume a 1" bore, with the ports on the opposite side of vintage mustangs/ford.  

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Getting correct brake pedal feel on 64 Falcon with 03 Cobra Brakes » 8/15/2024 2:51 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 11

Go to post

kardad wrote:

BobE:
Do you have any photos of the finished product in your 66? Did you lower the master cylinder or leave it and the stock location?

Did everyone miss the fact that CJ428Mach is putting a 7.3 Godzilla motor and 5-speed in a 64 Falcon for his daughter? I'm extremely jealous, that will be a BEAST. All of my boys got Jeeps with 4.0 6cyl

I didn't want to go Coyote because I figured it would be too wide and I'd have a nightmare on brakes/steering. Guess what its still a nightmare on brakes/steering. 


 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Getting correct brake pedal feel on 64 Falcon with 03 Cobra Brakes » 8/15/2024 2:40 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 11

Go to post

RTM wrote:

Some of the pictures are not showing up.

https://fyi.boardhost.com/viewtopic.php?id=10312

Thanks! My only concern is that I have no room to move anything downwards, if I did I would probably go vacuum. You can kind of see the master cylinder hole in the firewall. I could try to go up but that could give me export brace issues, I can't go towards the drivers side or I'll have shock tower issues. I should know more in the next few days once the cobra hydroboost setup shows up. I can't get the image posted but I have a link to the pic of what I'm dealing with.

https://ibb.co/jwvwkCg

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Getting correct brake pedal feel on 64 Falcon with 03 Cobra Brakes » 8/15/2024 10:50 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 11

Go to post

MS wrote:

The hydroboost has a curved pedal rod that will move the pin about 3/4” lower than stock.
That changes the pedal ratio from 6:1 stock to a little over 4:1.
That is the change that the MustangSteve vacuum power booster retrofit uses. I have been experimenting on 65 Mustang with moving the pedal pivot up as high as possible in the car and adding a section to the pedal to increase the distance between the pedal pivot and the pedal pin. That moves the pin lower and puts the foot contact plate back down to stock position. It will also help reduce pedal ratio. The 98 pedal is closer to 3:1, so any change you can add will help. Do not go with less than 3:1 brake pedal ratio.
As you know, the clutch pedal has to be modified similarly. By relocating the bearing kit as high as possible on the pedal support, the clutch pedal can be moved upward with the brake pedal. Around 1/2” higher is max. Then, shorten the distance between the quadrant and the clutch pivot bearing, then lengthen the clutch pedal length between the foot contact plate and the pivot. This will increase the clutch pedal length, giving a more effective clutch pedal ratio, but less travel for the cable. Luckily, in stock configuration, the clutch pedal pulls the cable far farther than needed, so this mod will help with clutch pedal leg effort and still pull the cable the required 1” to properly operate a diaphragm type pressure plate.

The Falcon has more room under the cowl to work with than a Mustang, so you might be able to get it closer to what you need than in a Mustang. Just work within two parameters. At least 3:1 ratio on brakes and clutch cable must be able to pull 1”. You don’t have to have free travel like a z-bar needs, so every movement of the clutch pedal is translated to movement of the cable.

On a side note, be sure to use a FORD throwout bearing. Anything else and you will get to replace it in a short time.

The brake pedal rod on the Cobra boosters appears to be stra

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Getting correct brake pedal feel on 64 Falcon with 03 Cobra Brakes » 8/15/2024 7:58 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 11

Go to post

Hey guys, I'm building a 64 Falcon that will be my daughters car. I'm planning to try to make the car as modern as possible and with that its getting a 7.3 Godzilla with TKX installed and modern suspension. In order to fit the Godzilla and deal with some damage previously in its life the car got AJE suspension which uses 94+ Mustang suspension and steering rack so my plan was to just use as much 94-04 parts to keep it modern feeling and working well. 

The front and rear brakes are going to be 03/04 Cobra brakes. In order to keep things simple I thought I would look at vacuum brake boosters but nothing is going to fit in there with the Godzilla. I sourced an 03/04 Cobra Hydroboost, master cylinder, and distribution block that are on the way to me. I'm planning to run the stock pedal assembly and have already added the MS bearing Kit to it and a Quadrant to it but I'm concerned about brake pedal ratio on the brake pedal.

I'm wondering what I need to do in order to get a proper pedal ratio on the brake pedal. I'm familiar with the 67+ Mustangs and how those power brake pedal supports were different in order to allow a better pedal ratio but I don't believe thats going to work on the Falcon. I see MS sells a new brake pedal pin for relocating the pin but how can I just move the brake pedal pin and have the booster connect to it and work properly without relocating the brake booster downward as well? 

Anyone have any insight? I've thought about buying a 67+ brake support and blending it with the stock falcon one some how to raise the brake pedal mounting location as high as possible without hitting the cowl but wasn't sure that would work. 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/22/2017 8:03 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

I swapped in the 1" master cylinder and i can say there was a noticeable increase in braking power. I probably still have some bleeding to do as I didn't have a helper. I bench bled the master cylinder and managed to bleed the rear brakes a few times with a ratchet strap but after seeing not a single bubble of air I didn't bother to bleed the fronts.

I have some other mods to do on the lift and I'll see if I can round up a helper to properly bleed the brakes. Thanks for all the help guys.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/20/2017 6:31 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

Rudi wrote:

The 1" ms will get you more PSI. I had a 1 1/8" ms on my 68 and it would not stop worth a crap. It now stops on the proverbial dime with a 1" diameter master cylinder.
 Get a hydraulic brake system pressure gauge and see for yourself.

Was your car running a brake booster? or was it manual brakes?

I was looking in the basement and I have a 1" master cylinder that was on the car for about 15 mins. I might get it back out and give it a try.

I do remember now the pedal assembly was originally setup to be a manual brake setup so the pedal geometry should be geared toward a manual brake.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/19/2017 9:19 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

The 1" master cylinder is going to do what? increase pressure? the pedal seems to go down easy enough with the booster.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/19/2017 6:26 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

MS wrote:

I love that car!!!

Whar bore size is your master cylinder, and what is the pedal ratio?
Does it have a booster? Those are fanrastic brakes when tte system is set up right.
You are better off with the original Ford pads than with anything off the local shelf.

Thanks everybody for the kind words. I fell in love with 37's when I was just a little kid and believe it or not this is my first car. I bought her at the age of 13 when working summers at the family business, I'm just now getting her where I want at the age of 34.

If memory serves the master cylinder is 1 1/8" corvette style master cylinder, and the booster is a small 7" dual diaphragm booster.  I have no idea what the pedal ratio is, the pedals were provided by Pete and Jakes Hot Rods. I haven't checked vacuum but its running a Boss 351 with EFI and a George Pence 351CJ camshaft on 114 LSA, so it should produce pretty good vacuum for the booster.

The rear brake setup is Explorer discs.

I did find out the other day day that the proportioning valve that goes to the rear was completely turned all the way one direction. The sticker on the handle has fallen off so I don't know which way to turn the valve but it would only go counter clockwise so I turned it a few turns and will see what that does. In theory that would be taking away from the front brakes but I guess the valve could operate backwards.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/18/2017 12:12 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

Bullet Bob wrote:

Good lookin' '37, CJ.  My favorite Ford year.  My bro-in-law just found a pretty nice '40 Cp.  Very happy for him butteye (TS) prefer the '37.

BB
 

Thank you! I maybe a little biased but I've never figured out why the 37 is considered the "ugly duckling" of the Fat Fendered Fords. I've never understood why it isn't more popular than the 40's, I guess I just don't have the right taste lol.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/18/2017 11:34 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

MS wrote:

Please report results when you get it completed.

The 3/16" spacers worked on my setup to get everything lined up. I finished the install this weekend and took it for a short drive and everything held up fine. While the new 12.5" setup is much better than the 11" granada based setup I had I must say the performance was a little lacking. I actually reused the brake pads and rotors off the parts car and that might be where the problem is.  I was expecting similar braking to my 03 Cobra if not better as my 37 weighs much less.

Surprisingly with my 17" torque thrusts the caliper was wanting to hit the spokes of the rim, putting the partially worn pads on, using my 3/16" home made spacers, and using a 1/8" wheel spacer I had laying around gave me some much needed clearance.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » "Homemade" throttle body » 12/18/2017 11:23 AM

cj428mach
Replies: 18

Go to post

Nice work, I had plans to try to do the same thing on my home built EFI 351C 4v until I scored a Massflo throttlebody and MAF. It wasn't cheap but it was the best $650 I've spent!



You mentioned IAC issues, you can always go with a remote IAC or maybe a 94-95 IAC as they're shorter.

You might be able to use the restrictor kit as your spacer.
https://lmr.com/item/LRS-9939A/1986-93-Mustang-50L-58L-Idle-Air-Control-Iac-Adjuster?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhabfooiU2AIVWbbACh0dWQC9EAQYASABEgL0hvD_BwE

Remote IAC setup is another idea
http://www.modularmotorsportsracing.com/cart/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=701

 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/11/2017 7:59 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

I removed the MS supplied washers and cut my own 1 piece spacers out of 3/16" steel which seems to have it pretty close on the one wheel I tested it on. I had to remove the spacers to powder coat them black and should be able to assemble tomorrow.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 8:09 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

rpm wrote:

Ya, I'd think it was the mixing of the MII spindles and 65-73 hubs for the interference.

I believe thats what the kit was designed for.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 7:43 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

MS wrote:

The bolts will be close, but not hit.
Did you install new bearing races in the hubs?
If you are certain everything is bolted up tight, as designed, then the hubs must be different. Per my design, your bracket will not be perfectly centered about the rotor, but will be where it cannot rub.

Another thought. Are you using factory MustangII spindles or V8 65-73 spindles?

Yes, new bearing races and hubs.

I am using Mustang II spindles. It looks like I just need to make some spacers.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 7:42 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

rpm wrote:

It doesn't appear to be a hub issue.

Thank you! That at least saves me from spending money on some different hubs.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 6:28 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

Chaplin wrote:

Do you have another caliper bracket you can try? I had a similar problem when I installed my MS brackets for the Cobra brake conversion on my 65- the rotor was hitting the caliper bracket. I was using all new parts and double checked the hubs, rotors, and all measurements and all looked good. Out of desperation/exasperation, I bolted up a different caliper bracket that I had laying around and all worked perfectly. Both caliper brackets- the one that hit and the one that worked perfectly- were factory brackets, so there must be a small variance even among the factory stuff.

Thanks for the reply. I did try the caliper bracket off the other side and rotor to double check it with no luck. I assume the rotor should be centered in the bracket opening so I'm at least a 1/4" off one direction.

The supplied bolt that bolts the MS spindel bracket to the MS caliper bracket is also just barely clearing the rotor. Maybe a few thousands of an inch, is this normal?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 6:24 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

I do have the special trimmed chrome washer installed along with the other supplied full sized washer in place. That wasn't enough adding 1 washer to each side (I trimmed one to clear as well) and that got the rotor out to where it would have just barely touched the caliper bracket. I'm tempted to just make my own spacer plate out of 1/4" or 3/8" but I'd like to know where my issue is coming from.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 5:59 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

MS wrote:

I do not have dimensions to compare to yours. If you bolted the rotor to the hub and the caliper bracket to the MS bracket, how much interference would you have? Are you using A12 and A13 bearings?

The only variable is I can imagine is the hub. I have never used that hub, but I would think it would be same as 70 Mustang drum hubs, which fit perfectly.

Your rotor is too far inboard, right? Did you buy a new rotor, or are you using the original from the 2006 GT. Original caliper and bracket taken directly off the donor car?

I have more than an extra washers length interference. I added another washer on top of the ones supplied in the kit and it spaces the rotor out just about where the inside edge of caliper bracket should be (the bracket got worn down by the rotor as seen in last picture).

I am using brand new A12 and A13 bearings and races.

That is correct, the rotor is in to far. The rotors, calipers, etc were all taken off a wrecked 06 GT mustang by me and all parts are FOMOCO.

Do you by chance have a 65-73 Mustang that you can measure the length of to compare to mine?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 2:33 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

Pics

Front Edge of hub to brake bracket 2.321"


Front Edge of hub to main bracket. 1.894"


Front Edge of hub to inside edge of hub. 1.99"


Caliper Bracket inside edge rubbing


Thanks






 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What's wrong with my Mustang Steve S197 brake setup. » 12/10/2017 2:31 PM

cj428mach
Replies: 37

Go to post

I have a 1937 Ford with a Mustang II front suspension under it, I also have a 2006 Mustang GT parts car I'm installing the front brakes off of using MS kit. I installed the MS brackets, the 2006 GT rotors on drum hubs off a 1970 Falcon, the problem is the rotor sits in too close in or the MS brackets are sitting to far out. The outside diameter of the Hubs (where the square cut is) were slightly too large to fit inside the rotor so i had to have the outside edge knocked off in a lathe to get them to drop into the rotor so obviously they weren't perfect fit hubs. I believe the problem is my front hub but I've taken measurements of everything, hopefully someone can see what the issue is. The inside edge of the caliper bracket was rubbing the rotor.
 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.