| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
Yesterday I started the final assembly on my new shortblock. The shop assembled the short block and installed my cam also. I got the heads on yesterday and started measuring pushrod length today. The cam is a Comp XE 264 grind on an HO blank that was done by Delta cams. Right away it was obvious that I would need two rod lengths which is not a big deal and did not surprise me. On the right bank the intakes wanted a 6.300 pushrod to center the roller tip and the exhausts needed a 6.400". Okay my XE 266 that I'm replacing wanted 6.400 across so I'm half way there...only need to buy eight rods.
I went ahead and checke all of the right bank and they all were right on with those rod lengths. Good stuff. Then I went to the left bank and would not have been surprised to have that side need something a bit different. Butt (TS&T), what I found is very weird. The left bank also requires 6.300 and 6.400" rods. Only it requires the longer ones on the Intake and the short ones on the exhaust.. Very strange.
All the valve stems are in the same plane and my test lifters are within a thou or two. There is some angle variations in the seated rocker studs on these AFR heads....very disapointed in the overaall machining quality...and tomorrow I will put all the studs in and check them with a straight edge. Other than that it just about has to be the base circles on the cam but whey would the left and right lobes be different.
I did do a quickie index check and it looks like it's pretty close though the lift is a bit more than advertised. That could be due to my solid check lifters I suppose.
Anyone every had something like this or is it common.
BB1
Offline
It sure doesn't sound common. Lifter bores sometimes move due to core shift. I'm wondering if that may play a part?
Offline
That is just weird.
Did you measure the base circle diameters?
Do your rockers all have the same ratio? Sometimes exhaust and intakes use different ratios...
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
It sure doesn't sound common. Lifter bores sometimes move due to core shift. I'm wondering if that may play a part?
I'm thinking that the dimension from the cam lobe to the rocker is the same regardless of any lifter boss shift. I made some solid roller lifters by making aluminum plugs to replace the guts and including hardened steel pushrod seats...has some left over from way back in the four-banger days.
The lifters are within .001 of being the same length. I check the adjustable pushrods after each cyl.
It takes a lot of pushrod change to move the roller contact point on the valve stem just a little bit so I'm thinking the problem...if it is and I don't think it will actually matter...is in the heads. Either valve angles or rocker stud angles which would make big differences with small variations.
I'll know more tomorrow or over the weekend and will let you know.
BB1
Offline
I would verify that the rockers studs are true, and if not correct that first. Then consider valve angles.
Have you contacted AFR about the machining issues with the heads? I'm really taken aback by that. My AFRs were pieces of artwork.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
I would verify that the rockers studs are true, and if not correct that first. Then consider valve angles.
Have you contacted AFR about the machining issues with the heads? I'm really taken aback by that. My AFRs were pieces of artwork.
I've been noodleing this all night and I'm sure it's the rocker studs. The valve stems height was all over the place but the angles are very good, and we fixed the stem height on this rebuild. This morning I'm going to install all the studs without the guide plates. I believe the stamped guide plates are the biggest problem as they tend to put uneven torquing loads on the studs. It takes very little stud tilt to move the roller contact point...obviously. But it takes a lot of pushrod length change to correct it. If I had my mill set up I would surface them.
Got a plan...will let you know.
Offline
Does intake and exhaust have different maximum lift?
If so, might want to verify if profile for opposite bank is swapped.
Cam ground for SBC?
Last edited by Nos681 (2/12/2021 6:47 PM)
Offline
Well I was right...I think. I removed all the guide plates and torqued the studs down directly to the heads. No angularity issues, the studs were all within .010 at the top according to my straight edge and feeler gauge. So I put the plates back in and discovered that by moving the plates around a bit to change the contact area under the studs I could get a fairly centered contact point with the rocker. Have two that are just slightly off center but not enough to get excited about. This is all with the 6.400" rods so I can use what I have. What a PIA...I could easily be talked into bolting on the old ported E7TE heads that I had on it way back. Won't, but don't tempt me. Indexed the cam...it's within a couple of degrees of the timing card so I'm happy.
Now...if anyone has an extra AOD-E (Not 4R70W) pan they can spare I'm pretty close to putting all this crap into one pile.
Thanks for the thinking guys.
Offline
BB - so, what do you attribute the problem was?
That the guide plates weren't always being torqued flush on the pedestal mount?
Offline
Did you advance the cam or...install it straight up or....was there advance already 'ground-in' the cam?
My cam from Delta was neutral....No advance ground in.
Glad you got it 'fingered-out'!!!
6sal6
Offline
Don’t you mean heap?
What brand guide plates and studs?
As a teenager, would you have even checked these measurements?
Set it and forget it...let’s burn some rubber!
I keep learning stuff from ya.
Last edited by Nos681 (2/14/2021 9:36 AM)
Offline
BobE wrote:
BB - so, what do you attribute the problem was?
That the guide plates weren't always being torqued flush on the pedestal mount?
Due to some basic bone-headedness I got heads with screw-in stud mounted rockers, not pedestals. The studs have flanges that provide a torque surface to pull down to the mating surface on the head. The guide plates are mounted under the studs. The guide plates are stamped and hardened and have a rather large hole through which the head end of the stud can pass. The problem seems to be that the hole is large enough to allow the stud flange to NOT torque down evenly which causes a slight tipping of the stud due to minor thread slop between the head and stud. It does not take much unevenness at the flange to cause the top of the stud to lean off center enough to put the rocker tip way off the center of the valve stem. By carefully positioning the guide plate it's possible to mitigate most of this issue. Crappy system IMO.
Offline
BB, I run shaft mounted rockers now, but last time I did buy guide plates I remember having the problem you refer to. I then noticed the heads I had were machined for 3/8" rocker studs and the guide plates were for 7/16" studs. 7/16 studs fixed the problem.
Offline
I think I used the 7/16 'Shivel-lay' studs in mine too......(when I had one break on the way to Texas many-many years ago.me & BILLY WALTON wus-a traveling together broke just as I got to 'Aller-bammer')
ARP ones!\6s6
Offline
DC wrote:
BB, I run shaft mounted rockers now, but last time I did buy guide plates I remember having the problem you refer to. I then noticed the heads I had were machined for 3/8" rocker studs and the guide plates were for 7/16" studs. 7/16 studs fixed the problem.
These heads are threaded for 7/16 studs but the studs they provided are "stepped" down to 3/8 above the flange. If I thought I could harden them enough I'd make a set of proper non-adjustable guide plates. May anyway once I get old Ted's machines setup. I thought it was crappy machining on the heads but without the guide plates the studs are nearly perfect. Always sumpin'.
Offline
On my son's 351W I used Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads. The Valves are angled. But I pulled a roller lifter apart and threw some washers in it so it was solid lifter. I don't recall what final measurement was but they all came out really close do one another. So I only needed one sized pushrod.
Steve69
Offline
Steve69 wrote:
On my son's 351W I used Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads. The Valves are angled. But I pulled a roller lifter apart and threw some washers in it so it was solid lifter. I don't recall what final measurement was but they all came out really close do one another. So I only needed one sized pushrod.
Steve69
I did essentially the same thing, Steve. I gutted two old roller lifters and turned a couple of aluminum plugs with hardened pushrod seats in one end. That gave me two "solid" lifters exactly the same length as non-compressed new lifters. Once I figured out how to get the rocker studs close I also am able to use same length pushrods. Aint it fun!!!
Offline
On my AFRs I hada chit can the one piece guide plates and use somebody's, maybe Comp Cams, 2 piece interlocking adjustable guide plates.
Offline
And another thing I just learned. The three or four times I've had an SBF roller apart I found that the roller lifters can be inserted or removed with the heads on. When I ordered the new parts for the fresh engine in the Heap I stepped up to the FRP High Performance lifters...why? Just seemed like a good idea for the minor price difference. Well, guess what...they are just over .040 taller than the cheapo lifters and CAN NOT be installed with the heads on. At least not the AFR 165's bolted down. And since the AFR 165's are prone to leaking at the rear outside corners due to the water hole in the head being almost too large, I used a little smear of RTV in that area. SO...pulling the heads to install the lifters also ruined the gaskets. What a hoot. The fun just never stops.
Offline
I usually take it as a given that the lifters won't come out with the heads installed. Probably because I'm always using aftermarket lifters that are taller than stock.
On the gaskets, what kind are you using? Reason I ask is that you can clean MLS gaskets and reuse them. I've even heard of guys separating the layers and cleaning each layer individually. I'll add that they are very good gaskets in all other respects too.
Offline
I'm using Fel-Pro 1011-1 which is an MLS gasket. Butt...as you may recall from a previous thread regarding coolant leakage with the AFR heads, it was suggested, and I agreed, that a little smear of RTV in the offending area might solve the problem. And, I think it will but it also renders the gasket as junk if the heads have to be pulled after a few hours. It pulls just enough material off that I could not take a chance, so....new gaskets again.
Offline
Permatex 80652 remove silicone and the residue without damaging the gaskets. I will always ere on the side of caution, but MLS gaskets are pricey, so if they can be saved and reused I'm always game for that. Just a thought.
Offline
Bullet Bob wrote:
Steve69 wrote:
On my son's 351W I used Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads. The Valves are angled. But I pulled a roller lifter apart and threw some washers in it so it was solid lifter. I don't recall what final measurement was but they all came out really close do one another. So I only needed one sized pushrod.
Steve69I did essentially the same thing, Steve. I gutted two old roller lifters and turned a couple of aluminum plugs with hardened pushrod seats in one end. That gave me two "solid" lifters exactly the same length as non-compressed new lifters. Once I figured out how to get the rocker studs close I also am able to use same length pushrods. Aint it fun!!! Not...LOL I must of pissed away a couple of days with the pushrod checker and getting the rocker arms centered on valve stem. I wanted to get them perfect so I probably took longer than needed.
Offline
Bullet Bob wrote:
BobE wrote:
BB - so, what do you attribute the problem was?
That the guide plates weren't always being torqued flush on the pedestal mount?Due to some basic bone-headedness I got heads with screw-in stud mounted rockers, not pedestals. The studs have flanges that provide a torque surface to pull down to the mating surface on the head. The guide plates are mounted under the studs. The guide plates are stamped and hardened and have a rather large hole through which the head end of the stud can pass. The problem seems to be that the hole is large enough to allow the stud flange to NOT torque down evenly which causes a slight tipping of the stud due to minor thread slop between the head and stud. It does not take much unevenness at the flange to cause the top of the stud to lean off center enough to put the rocker tip way off the center of the valve stem. By carefully positioning the guide plate it's possible to mitigate most of this issue. Crappy system IMO.
BB - thanks for the update.
Offline
This is one of those threads I'm glad I read. Not that I plan on building anything soon but its a good thing to know. Glad you figured it out.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |