| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
I have 164 tooth toploader bellhousing. I was thinking of switching to a 157 tooth flywheel and bellhousing. Seems to be more clutch options with the 157 flywheel. Is the Z bar linkage the same for both bellhousings?
What street/strip clutch and pressure plate have you been happy with?
Thanks!
Last edited by Steve69 (11/09/2021 12:16 PM)
Offline
ZBar is same
Offline
Make sure the flywheel balance is the same for both. big problems otherwise.
Offline
This is what I am using for a stock ‘92 5.0L/T5 combo.
It’s been used with 3.73’s (in ‘92) and now 3.25’s (in ‘65).
Offline
lowercasesteve wrote:
Make sure the flywheel balance is the same for both. big problems otherwise.
I put the wrong flywheel on once…once.
Offline
Thanks for the info guys!
Steve69
Offline
Nos681 wrote:
This is what I am using for a stock ‘92 5.0L/T5 combo.
It’s been used with 3.73’s (in ‘92) and now 3.25’s (in ‘65).
Hey Dan, Are you running a stock 5.0 flywheel on this clutch? 10.4?
Offline
Steve69 wrote:
Seems to be more clutch options with the 157 flywheel.
That's news to me.
With an appropriately drilled 164T flywheel you can use the 10", 10.5" or 11" clutch. With an appropriately drilled 157T flywheel you are limited to the 10" or 10.5" clutch.
Offline
Check to verify the 164-tooth flywheel’s diameter isn’t larger than the 157 tooth, and the block plate maybe different also. I did run into this many years ago, and the scatter-shield I had did have two starter mounting holes. Anyway, something to check. I have a Centerforce clutch/pressure plate (diaphragm type) and am happy with it.
Offline
Muzz 66 wrote:
lowercasesteve wrote:
Make sure the flywheel balance is the same for both. big problems otherwise.
I put the wrong flywheel on once…once.
So MUZZ 66 what were the results with wrong flywheel weight? Just Curious.
thks
Offline
Steve69 wrote:
Nos681 wrote:
This is what I am using for a stock ‘92 5.0L/T5 combo.
It’s been used with 3.73’s (in ‘92) and now 3.25’s (in ‘65).
Hey Dan, Are you running a stock 5.0 flywheel on this clutch? 10.4?
I had factory stock 92 flywheel resurfaced locally, when Advanced Auto used to be a Napa.
If I remember correctly, Engineering number started with E6 just like my bell housing.
Keep in mind, the 5.0L is 50oz balance.
Prior to 82(?) was 28oz balance.
This is also for T5 , not familiar with requirements for Toploader.
Offline
mjacobs wrote:
Muzz 66 wrote:
lowercasesteve wrote:
Make sure the flywheel balance is the same for both. big problems otherwise.
I put the wrong flywheel on once…once.
So MUZZ 66 what were the results with wrong flywheel weight? Just Curious.
thks
A wrong balance on a flywheel will cause vibration at damn near any RPM. Please don't ask how I know.
Offline
RV6 wrote:
mjacobs wrote:
Muzz 66 wrote:
I put the wrong flywheel on once…once.So MUZZ 66 what were the results with wrong flywheel weight? Just Curious.
thks
A wrong balance on a flywheel will cause vibration at damn near any RPM. Please don't ask how I know.
Hmm...I don't remember hearing that story.
Offline
Bearing Bob wrote:
RV6 wrote:
mjacobs wrote:
So MUZZ 66 what were the results with wrong flywheel weight? Just Curious.
thks
A wrong balance on a flywheel will cause vibration at damn near any RPM. Please don't ask how I know.Hmm...I don't remember hearing that story.
Let’s rev him up and shake the story out!
Offline
Texas! wrote:
Steve69 wrote:
Seems to be more clutch options with the 157 flywheel.
That's news to me.
With an appropriately drilled 164T flywheel you can use the 10", 10.5" or 11" clutch. With an appropriately drilled 157T flywheel you are limited to the 10" or 10.5" clutch.
. Mine is 10” and 11” only.
Offline
Texas! wrote:
Steve69 wrote:
Seems to be more clutch options with the 157 flywheel.
That's news to me.
With an appropriately drilled 164T flywheel you can use the 10", 10.5" or 11" clutch. With an appropriately drilled 157T flywheel you are limited to the 10" or 10.5" clutch.
. Mine is 10” and 11” only.
Offline
mjacobs wrote:
Muzz 66 wrote:
lowercasesteve wrote:
Make sure the flywheel balance is the same for both. big problems otherwise.
I put the wrong flywheel on once…once.
So MUZZ 66 what were the results with wrong flywheel weight? Just Curious.
thks
Sorry, I didn’t see your reply earlier. Yeah, a serious banging and wobble shake ensued. It was immediate and loud. One of those “Oh, man…this whole thing’s gotta come back out again!” moments. haven’t really thought about it since the 90’s and was really careful swapping the other trans I did a few years later. I took the AOD out of my ‘85 T-bird and put it behind my 250. I think I put the 5.0 flex plate on cuz the C4 plate wouldn’t bolt up to the crank or torque converter. Yeah, the 5.0 plate didn’t work either, but it bolted up. I found some guy at a wrecking yard in Mojave, California who knew immediately what part I needed. One of those flex plates from a 1980-ish Ford 200 that I believe used a V8 bell housing pattern for a couple years? It’s been forever so I may have the story totally messed up in my head.
Last edited by Muzz 66 (11/19/2021 11:41 AM)
Offline
It would be like putting a single pillow in a washing machine and wait for spin cycle.
Yeah, my kids did that too.😂
Offline
set that sucker on spin
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |