| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
Offline
These type of tests are exactly what I set up / ran / analyzed for the GOV on mil aircraft. (Yes I miss it)
Great FYI on Automobile gas.
videos/2022590047916503
also log onto site,, many great tear down audits that explain/analyze EXACTLY what is going on.
Last edited by Don (12/30/2021 9:55 AM)
Offline
I'm not on Facebook myself, but he has a channel on YouTube:
Offline
I don't buy it. There is not enough information. Starting with traction, which means rubber compound and tread design, and vehicle weight, etc. Get everything equal except the item you are arguing about then we will talk. If your arguing power then doing a tug of war would not be the test. but a dynamometer would.
Offline
HudginJ3 wrote:
I don't buy it. There is not enough information. Starting with traction, which means rubber compound and tread design, and vehicle weight, etc. Get everything equal except the item you are arguing about then we will talk. If your arguing power then doing a tug of war would not be the test. but a dynamometer would.
Provided you corrected the dyno numbers for air conditions, which can change during the day and effect power (temperature, humidity, etc.). There are standard correction factors for this, but I never hear mention of it, and often see them missed in such tests.
Offline
Speaking about his site, I'd never heard of 85 octane regular gas here before this video:
.
Good to know that I should avoid it next time I'm in the higher elevations.
Offline
Rufus68 wrote:
Speaking about his site, I'd never heard of 85 octane regular gas here before this video:
.
Good to know that I should avoid it next time I'm in the higher elevations.
With the red car back home at 700ft the old cleveland with near 11.1 comp it can get away with 93 octane. Driving to Montrose Co. at 5000+ft premium 91 dosen't cut it.
Been towing a lot the last 2 months and it seems that a tank of gas goes a little further between fill ups at higher elevations. So is it modern technology or just my imagination?
Offline
red351 wrote:
Rufus68 wrote:
Speaking about his site, I'd never heard of 85 octane regular gas here before this video:
.
Good to know that I should avoid it next time I'm in the higher elevations.
With the red car back home at 700ft the old cleveland with near 11.1 comp it can get away with 93 octane. Driving to Montrose Co. at 5000+ft premium 91 dosen't cut it.
Been towing a lot the last 2 months and it seems that a tank of gas goes a little further between fill ups at higher elevations. So is it modern technology or just my imagination?
No, that makes sense. Thinner air, would use less fuel at the same air/fuel ratio, but there would be a corresponding loss of power. Modern EFI just copes with it better than a carb could. Newer engines may also be able to monkey with cam timing, ignition timing, and if equipped turbo waste gate settings to get some of that lost power back so it might not be as noticeable.
Offline
Higher elevations work like reverse boost for normally aspirated engines. So your 11.1 compression ratio engine would test with a lower compression at 5000ft and so would tolerate a lower octane fuel without detonation. All of this based on the explanation from the video. Your power output would decrease from the smaller charge of air/fuel mix drawn in each stroke due to the decreased air pressure.
Offline
I remember regular and unleaded
Offline
Me too. That was when Regular was always 89 octane and we were surprised to see the Unleaded listed as 87 octane.
Offline
Here on the east coast reg. was 91. I spent nites working after school working pumping gas at a Gulf station.
Gulftane was 89 oct 29.9 per gal.
Goodgulf was 91 & 31.9 per gal.
NoNox I can't remember oct. or the dollar amount, I just knew I couldn't afford it.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |