FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

7/14/2024 2:13 PM  #1


302 Tunnel Port Heads.

 

7/14/2024 5:57 PM  #2


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

Yeah, if I had money to burn...

 

7/14/2024 6:19 PM  #3


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

Money, time and patience. Tuning could be challenging.

     Thread Starter
 

7/15/2024 5:37 AM  #4


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

I would love to build one.    It would make for a cool conversational piece at the cat meets.

 

7/15/2024 6:40 AM  #5


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 

7/15/2024 8:08 AM  #6


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

TKOPerformance wrote:

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 
I built a 460 SCJ engine that had major head work done.  Had a solid roller cam 714 lift and 310 duration, if my memory serves me correctly.  Car wouldn’t idle below 1700rpm and had a 1050 BG carb on top, back by a big in big out top loader 4-speed in a 70 fastback.  I loved driving that car on the street. 

I would build and drive a TP 302 all day, even it wasn’t practical.   I would enjoy it.   Lol

 

7/15/2024 8:22 AM  #7


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

RTM wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 
I built a 460 SCJ engine that had major head work done.  Had a solid roller cam 714 lift and 310 duration, if my memory serves me correctly.  Car wouldn’t idle below 1700rpm and had a 1050 BG carb on top, back by a big in big out top loader 4-speed in a 70 fastback.  I loved driving that car on the street. 

I would build and drive a TP 302 all day, even it wasn’t practical.   I would enjoy it.   Lol

 
Are you actually 6Sally6's son?


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

7/15/2024 12:40 PM  #8


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

MY BOY!!!!!!
Better brang plenty of cam....plenty of gear...plenty of 'Moo-la' for ga$
could ya imagine...all that engine with a Lenco hung on the back in.....  anything !!!
(i need some looser fitting pants!!)
6sally6

Last edited by 6sally6 (7/15/2024 7:28 PM)


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

7/15/2024 12:53 PM  #9


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

rpm wrote:

RTM wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 
I built a 460 SCJ engine that had major head work done.  Had a solid roller cam 714 lift and 310 duration, if my memory serves me correctly.  Car wouldn’t idle below 1700rpm and had a 1050 BG carb on top, back by a big in big out top loader 4-speed in a 70 fastback.  I loved driving that car on the street. 

I would build and drive a TP 302 all day, even it wasn’t practical.   I would enjoy it.   Lol

 
Are you actually 6Sally6's son?

 
Lol  so I’m not alone when it comes to wild engines.

 

7/15/2024 1:56 PM  #10


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

rpm wrote:

RTM wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 
I built a 460 SCJ engine that had major head work done.  Had a solid roller cam 714 lift and 310 duration, if my memory serves me correctly.  Car wouldn’t idle below 1700rpm and had a 1050 BG carb on top, back by a big in big out top loader 4-speed in a 70 fastback.  I loved driving that car on the street. 

I would build and drive a TP 302 all day, even it wasn’t practical.   I would enjoy it.   Lol

 
Are you actually 6Sally6's son?

 
🤣🤣🤣🤣


John  -- 67 Mustang Coupe 390 5 speed
 

7/20/2024 4:34 PM  #11


Re: 302 Tunnel Port Heads.

RTM wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

Definitely pegs the cool meter, but completely impractical for anything else.  Its a high RPM race engine.  I'm sure it screams at 8,000RPM, but it probably also idles at 2,000RPM.  Race engines don't make good, or even fun street engines.  From a racing standpoint its too valuable to risk damage actually racing it, and even if you were foolish enough to do that its doubtful its competitive with the modern hardware.  Even in vintage racing, there's a reason this design was abandoned in favor of the BOSS302.  Basically it was a cool evolutionary step. 

 
I built a 460 SCJ engine that had major head work done. Had a solid roller cam 714 lift and 310 duration, if my memory serves me correctly. Car wouldn’t idle below 1700rpm and had a 1050 BG carb on top, back by a big in big out top loader 4-speed in a 70 fastback. I loved driving that car on the street.

I would build and drive a TP 302 all day, even it wasn’t practical. I would enjoy it. Lol

Its only 126 cubic inches smaller with basically the same size ports.  Fun as a 6:13 rear gear would be...

Yeah, we had a ton of cars that had worked big blocks back in the day.  My uncle had a '67 L88 Vette, my Dad had an LS6 Chevelle that ran 10s.  They were a lot of fun on the street, but they still had some measure of low speed torque.
 

 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.