| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
1 2 Jump to
Offline
Offline
This seems impossible after watching the video "A Faster Horse" where much time is spent to make sure the Mustang name wasn't tarnished with the 2015 restyle of the Mustang. They also point out that everyone at Ford wants to work on the Mustang. Now this.
Offline
"Mom....Mom.....he said pissed"!!!
6sal6
Offline
I'm not upset at all, but I really don't have any interest in the newer Mustangs. The 65 through 69's are great and I can kinda tolerate some of the Fox bodies, but that's it. And then a car starting at 44K is a little out of my budget anyway.
Offline
What's a Mach E?? I live under a rock sometimes!!
Offline
It looks stupid with the blanked off grill. They are advertising it to get 250-300 miles per charge. No electric vehicle ever gets the miles/charge advertised, so they are starting out with a lie as a base premise. I don’t have a problem using the Mustang name on a SUV, but it looks like they left out the Sport part of Sport Utility Vehicle. A MGB GT body style with regular Mustang running gear would probably sell well. The people that buy electric cars are not generally Mustang fans, so their logic in using the Mustang name is questionable.
Offline
I don't mind an electric Mustang, BUT, a Mustang has 2 doors, basically two passengers, Low to the ground and good cornering. That is for the new ones. Gen 1's are great where they stand.
One of the car shows on what then was called Velocity had a 68 FB with electric power. It was a beast with something like 1000 lb-ft of torque at all speeds. It was a monster. I loved it.
Offline
I mean, they kind of murdered the car from '74-'78, yet it came back strong, so anything is possible. If it sucks its probably just a hiccup on the road. Electric stuff? Sure, fine, whatever. They are a terrible idea and don't work for the way 80% of Americans drive, but if those people are stupid enough to continue to buy dead technology that's their problem.
Offline
Now Ford is saying they want to build it in China.
Offline
It's funny how we think about the 1974 Mustang II. I didn't like them either. But, Motor Trend named the 1974 Mustang II the car of the year and it tripled the sales figures of the 1973 Mustang. So actually, it was a big success for Ford.
Offline
It's just the beginning of a Mach-E-odd-O or maybe a muck e odd O. I'm thinking they haven't used the Mach name for awhile so the name is to attract attention to the product. It ain't the first time. After making the mistake of naming the Mazda a Mustang they will never pre-introduce a car again.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
I mean, they kind of murdered the car from '74-'78, yet it came back strong, so anything is possible.
Boy do you have that right TKO! I often wondered what the designers and project managers at Ford were on during 1974 - 1978...
Offline
Hornman wrote:
Now Ford is saying they want to build it in China.
Are you kidding?
Offline
Rufus68 wrote:
It's funny how we think about the 1974 Mustang II. I didn't like them either. But, Motor Trend named the 1974 Mustang II the car of the year and it tripled the sales figures of the 1973 Mustang. So actually, it was a big success for Ford.
Financial success and legacy are often disparate. I mean, maybe we respect the K car as a huge success that cemented Lee Iacocca's legacy and saved Chrysler, but does anyone want to own one? Them was dark days in '74. Most of the decade actually. I mean, the '77 Camaro was a pile, but managed to outsell the Mustang for the first and only time in history. Ugh, dark, dark days.
Offline
Redvert67 wrote:
I'm not upset at all, but I really don't have any interest in the newer Mustangs. The 65 through 69's are great and I can kinda tolerate some of the Fox bodies, but that's it. And then a car starting at 44K is a little out of my budget anyway.
I have to revise my initial post, I had not seen pics yet and did not realize they turned it into a SUV. I wish the announcement had waited till April 1st, it would make more sense then.
Offline
Stevo wrote:
Hornman wrote:
Now Ford is saying they want to build it in China.
Are you kidding?
Not kidding. The initial production is scheduled for Mexico, but the Ford decision makers have expressed a desire to move production to China. Shows that the business plutocrats never mix with the man-on-the-street or they would know what the American working man thinks of an American company producing goods in China for sale in America. Of course the average buyer of electric vehicles probably has a more world view of things.
Offline
The E thing is borrowed the 60's. The Mach thing just doesn't fit in a all (past history). Anybody remember the Silverado hybrid. What did they sell like 1.
Offline
No problem with the product. Hate the association with Mustang.
Offline
Please
Name it something other than Mustang. It is in NO WAY like a Mustang
Offline
I'm not really a fan of cars being built in Mexico, well, until the said they would build it in China that is.
Offline
upload pic
Interesting question
Offline
They should have kept a horse theme and went with something like Ford Shire. Inspired by the Mustang. What this will be is the second coming of the Edsel.
Offline
Ugh, four door Mustang. Thank the Lord that ended up only in the annals of automotive history.
Though, it would probably have made the two doors worth more...
I doubt Ford will release anything like another Edsel ever again. Along with New Coke its a case study used at Harvard business school that's supposed to teach you what not to do. The issue with the Edsel was that it didn't have its own price point and competed directly with Ford's other offerings. It was too costly to produce for the price point they had available. You can't build a product for a market that doesn't exist, and can't be created. The relative quality or lack thereof of that product is immaterial if no one can buy it.
Offline
TKOPerformance wrote:
Ugh, four door Mustang. Thank the Lord that ended up only in the annals of automotive history.
Though, it would probably have made the two doors worth more...
I doubt Ford will release anything like another Edsel ever again. Along with New Coke its a case study used at Harvard business school that's supposed to teach you what not to do. The issue with the Edsel was that it didn't have its own price point and competed directly with Ford's other offerings. It was too costly to produce for the price point they had available. You can't build a product for a market that doesn't exist, and can't be created. The relative quality or lack thereof of that product is immaterial if no one can buy it.
Ford just clearly said "hold my perrier!"
Offline
Where would the 4 door Mustang be today? Between the Falcon and the Fairlane? Both of those cars were replaced by the Fairmont. (What was the Torino? A Falcon or a Fairlane?) The Mustang would have gone several years ago and hardly a sports car. We'll just have to wait and see what happens to this one. I ain't buying one! Electricity doesn't make the right noise.
1 2 Jump to
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |