FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

10/25/2020 6:32 PM  #1


Understanding MAF

1965 Mustang Coupe, 1993 5.0 Swap, A9L ECU, EFI-MAF, T5z  

24# injectors 
70mm TB
Pro-M MAF calibrated for 24# injectors and 75mm TB
TPS = .98 
Fuel Pressure = 39psi


I'm currently fighting high idle situation on my car, its down to 1k rpm at idle from about 1.4k rpm. (I was able to get rid of the dreaded idle surge) I recently replaced the 02 sensors, then ran the car without the MAF sensor plugged in and the car ran at a 800 rpms, which is ideal, but once I plugged in the MAF sensor the car idled at 1k rpms. Side note: I also bog down at 3k rpms, I have a feeling the high idle and the bog at WOT are related issues. I'm still working through that issue, but once I run out of test ideas for that, Ill make another post.

I'm curious why the car would run great at idle with the MAF disconnected but at higher rpms with it connected? 


Beautiful Red 1965 Coupe 5.0L conversion - So it goes
 

10/25/2020 9:58 PM  #2


Re: Understanding MAF

Have you pulled trouble codes yet?
Some codes don’t make MIL to come on.

Last edited by Nos681 (10/25/2020 10:00 PM)

 

10/26/2020 3:46 AM  #3


Re: Understanding MAF

I'm no expert but I thought the car shouldn't run with the MAF disconnected?

 

10/26/2020 5:28 AM  #4


Re: Understanding MAF

One of the beautiful things about the EECIV is its ability to keep running.  It will run with most any one sensor unplugged.  It simply goes back to a default program using other parameters.  Its not going to be ideal, and may not be smooth, but its not going to leave you stranded either. 

Now 65to93 I need to understand your setup.  Is this a problem that just started?  What's been done to the engine?  I'm curious why you have a 75mm TB. 

 

10/26/2020 8:17 AM  #5


Re: Understanding MAF

65to93 wrote:

I'm curious why the car would run great at idle with the MAF disconnected but at higher rpms with it connected? 

I suspect it's because the MAF is telling the PCM that there is more air entering the engine than there actually is.  Does it start to stink rich with the MAF connected?  At higher RPMs it goes into closed loop and will always adjust fuel to be at Stoic.

Maybe....

BB1
 


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

10/26/2020 9:48 AM  #6


Re: Understanding MAF

Did you just plug in the MAF after it was running?

Might have to disconnect battery and restart.

From my understanding, the ECM will determine baseline for all sensors upon initial  power up.
If you just plugged in sensor afterwards, the amount of change could affect it. 
Might even have some codes recorded as well.

 

10/26/2020 11:11 AM  #7


Re: Understanding MAF

Where is your MAF mounted? Does it get a lot of fan wash? 

Honestly your best bet is to buy or borrow a wideband O2 sensor to see what's going on. usually "calibrated" MAFs can get you close enough, but in your case it's not.

I would also disconnect the battery over night to clear the KAM (keep alive memory) which clears out the fuel trim tables and the EEC will start to "learn" again. The MAF is not baselined at startup so you wouldn't be resetting anything like that.

What happens when you unplug the IAC?

Last edited by Raymond_B (10/26/2020 11:12 AM)

 

10/26/2020 4:50 PM  #8


Re: Understanding MAF

Thanks all for your input:

Engine - 302 cu, cobra intake, aluminum heads, mild cam, MSD 6al box, MSD ignition coil
Codes: 11, 67, 81, 82, 84, 85 
11 - System Ok
67 - NSS circuit failure - makes sense I currently don't have one 
81, 82 - air diverter solenoid failure
84 - EGR vacuum regulator 
85 - canister purge solenoid 

Since these codes are mostly smog related, I believe that a ecu is getting a faulty reading from a sensor.  

Sorry for the confusion: I have a 70mm TB but the MAF is calibrated for a 75mm. My understanding is that the MAF calibration should be a bit bigger than the TB. 

It seems Bullet Bob's theory aligns with the question I had about the MAF - I was reading 1.2 v at idle which, according to this, is the equivalent of running at 20ish mph. There could be some fan wash on the MAF, but when I hold a box in between the fan and the MAF, there is no change. 

In the thread I linked, one person mentioned that the tps could have an affect on the MAF reading, is this possible? Do you all have any suggestions on how to lower the MAF voltage so that it reads correctly at idle?

I wonder if its worth putting the car on a dyno. 

Thanks!

Last edited by 65to93 (10/26/2020 5:07 PM)


Beautiful Red 1965 Coupe 5.0L conversion - So it goes
     Thread Starter
 

10/26/2020 6:09 PM  #9


Re: Understanding MAF

It's tough to equate voltage to MPH especially in your case because you not only have a MAF for 24lb injectors it's not mounted the exact same way as a Fox body.

Having said that, your MAF, if truly "calibrated" for 24 lb injectors should have it's voltage scaled back by approximately the difference between 19's and 24's. 20% or so. That means the 1.2v you're seeing is even higher than a stock MAF. Are you sure the MAF is matched to the injectors? Is it engraved on the element?

What happens if you unplug the IAC? Have you been adjusting the idle with the set screw?

 

Last edited by Raymond_B (10/26/2020 6:10 PM)

 

10/27/2020 5:47 AM  #10


Re: Understanding MAF

The TB is too big for your application.  This doesn't explain you idle situation, but it can help explain other issues.  The problem is that the surface area of the throttle plate is significantly larger than stock.  The MAF can't be calibrated for this.  You have to tune the TPS based enrichment in the ECU.  Without doing that you will have fueling issues.

Based on your other changes I'm also going to recommend that you get the car tuned, because "calibrated" MAFs usually don't work 100% right on stock foxbody applications.  Your tuner should also be able to iron out the idle.

Alternately you can pick up a wideband O2, and something like the Moates Quarter Horse and software to tune it yourself.  If you never plan to mess with the combination again it may not be worth it, but if you do then it will pay for itself by avoiding further trips to the tuner. 
 

 

10/27/2020 10:01 AM  #11


Re: Understanding MAF

Personally I hate to see you spend money on a super basic combo, EEC-IV idle has always been problematic for some depending on the parts they are using. I keep harping on the IAC because it's very common practice for people to try to adjust the idle screw like they would a carb setup which foul up the operation of the IAC.

We can talk theory and light waves, sun spots, gravity wells, etc 'till the cows come home, but best to get all the simple stuff right 1st

 

10/27/2020 7:23 PM  #12


Re: Understanding MAF

The TB is the right size for a cobra air intake. I appreciate the tuning recommendation, I'll do some research on that option. 

Raymond - When I unplug the IAC, the engine stumbles or wont run if the base idle screw is not touching the plate.  It is interesting that you say this  " it's very common practice for people to try to adjust the idle screw like they would a carb setup which foul up the operation of the IAC."  because I have been following the base idle reset procedure. So I have been messing the with idle screw a lot.

Let me know if any this brings any thoughts to mind or tests to try! It sounds like this could be a bunch of things that aren't quite working together to run efficiently.  

 


Beautiful Red 1965 Coupe 5.0L conversion - So it goes
     Thread Starter
 

10/27/2020 10:20 PM  #13


Re: Understanding MAF

Have you inspected your IAC to aee if it has carbon buildup on it?

Another thing to inspect  is throttle blade.
Does it move freely?
Does it stick with screw backed off too far?

Last edited by Nos681 (10/27/2020 10:21 PM)

 

10/28/2020 5:54 AM  #14


Re: Understanding MAF

Just because the Cobra intake has a 75mm hole in it doesn't mean you need to run a 75mm TB.  It hurts nothing for the TB to be smaller than the opening in the intake.  The Cobras used a 65mm TB.  10mm doesn't seem like much, but its the surface area difference.  4,430 sq.mm vs. 3,317 sq.mm.  That's over 1,100 sq.mm difference and more importantly, its a difference of 34%. 

 

10/28/2020 8:09 PM  #15


Re: Understanding MAF

TKOPerformance wrote:

Just because the Cobra intake has a 75mm hole in it doesn't mean you need to run a 75mm TB.  It hurts nothing for the TB to be smaller than the opening in the intake.  The Cobras used a 65mm TB.  10mm doesn't seem like much, but its the surface area difference.  4,430 sq.mm vs. 3,317 sq.mm.  That's over 1,100 sq.mm difference and more importantly, its a difference of 34%. 

That's a point I had trouble convincing some guys years ago when it came to drilling jets.  .001 makes significant difference and .005 makes a huge difference.  People seem to forget about Pi...or maybe then never learned about it.


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

10/29/2020 6:36 AM  #16


Re: Understanding MAF

Bullet Bob wrote:

TKOPerformance wrote:

Just because the Cobra intake has a 75mm hole in it doesn't mean you need to run a 75mm TB.  It hurts nothing for the TB to be smaller than the opening in the intake.  The Cobras used a 65mm TB.  10mm doesn't seem like much, but its the surface area difference.  4,430 sq.mm vs. 3,317 sq.mm.  That's over 1,100 sq.mm difference and more importantly, its a difference of 34%. 

That's a point I had trouble convincing some guys years ago when it came to drilling jets.  .001 makes significant difference and .005 makes a huge difference.  People seem to forget about Pi...or maybe then never learned about it.

Yeah, I mean, I'm only running a 70mm on my 331 that's going to be in the 450HP range when done.  75mm is WAY overkill for anything other than a giant engine, super high RPM smaller engine, or forced induction. 
 

 

10/29/2020 8:16 AM  #17


Re: Understanding MAF

Just did a little # crunching for S & G.  A stock Autolite 4100 on a 289 has a venturi size of 1.08".  That works out to total area of 3.66 sq. in.  The larger 4100 had a venturi size of 1.12" for a totol area of 3.94 sq. in.
A 58mm throttle body as used on the "Standard" 5.0 has an area of 4.08 sq. in. which is 3% larger than the original 4100 used on the 302.
A 65mm TB with an area of 5.15 sq. in. is 30% larger than the 1.12 4100, and a 70mm TB has an area of 5.94 which is 50% bigger than a 4100 with 1.12" venturis. 
I don't recall the exact numbers but I think the 1.08 4100 was good for 480 CFM which makes the 1.12 venturi significantly bigger.  I also don't know the air flow dynamics but a 75mm TB with an area of 6.83 sq. in. has got to be the equivalent of a 650 cfm pot, or bigger.

BB1
 

Last edited by Bullet Bob (10/29/2020 8:19 AM)


"you get what you pay for, good work isn't cheap, and there are NO free lunches...PERIOD!"
 

10/29/2020 8:32 AM  #18


Re: Understanding MAF

65to93 wrote:

The TB is the right size for a cobra air intake. I appreciate the tuning recommendation, I'll do some research on that option. 

Raymond - When I unplug the IAC, the engine stumbles or wont run if the base idle screw is not touching the plate.  It is interesting that you say this  " it's very common practice for people to try to adjust the idle screw like they would a carb setup which foul up the operation of the IAC."  because I have been following the base idle reset procedure. So I have been messing the with idle screw a lot.

Let me know if any this brings any thoughts to mind or tests to try! It sounds like this could be a bunch of things that aren't quite working together to run efficiently.  

 

OK if you've been following that procedure then you're good. I mean you do have to adjust it some, but a lot of folks go in and just start cranking on the idle screw.

What is your fuel pressure at idle? And was it checked with the vacuum line off? Also what base (SPOUT out) timing are you running?

One thing I'd try, is unplug the IAC and then turn the set screw until the car idles. Make note of the RPM. Then disconnect the battery long enough to reset the computer then reconnect everything, See what happens, I am thinking you'll have a high idle, but maybe not.

There's always this item as well, people have used them for years on finicky idle cars. https://lmr.com/item/LRS-9939A/1986-93-Mustang-50L-58L-Idle-Air-Control-Iac-Adjuster

Kind of a long shot, but what's your battery voltage at idle?

 

 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.