FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

10/30/2020 8:19 PM  #1


Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

What are you guys using?

 

10/30/2020 8:35 PM  #2


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

Ford pan 289/302.....
6s6


Get busy Liv'in or get busy Die'n....Host of the 2020 Bash at the Beach/The only Bash that got cancelled  )8
 

10/30/2020 8:45 PM  #3


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

Stock 351w oil pan.


Original owner - 351w,T-5, 4whl disks, power R&P
 

10/30/2020 10:01 PM  #4


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

Didn't realize they made one, or that I'd bought one. Don't know what's low profile about it.


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

10/31/2020 5:25 AM  #5


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

I have the repro Boss 302 pan.

 

10/31/2020 6:36 AM  #6


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

That Milodon pan I don't think is any lower profile than stock; its low profile for a larger sump pan because the sump is kicked out instead of just deeper.  It holds more oil without additional depth. 

I run a stock pan on my '67, and a Canton pan on my '89 GT, which sits about 1" lower than stock ride height.  I really went with the Canton because it was a good budget pan for racing (its got some baffling, etc.).  I don't plan to race the car a ton, but for when I do its cheap insurance for my engine. 

 

10/31/2020 10:21 AM  #7


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

Could you guys add dimension from pan rail to bottom of pan?

What is oil capacity?  If known. Thanks

     Thread Starter
 

10/31/2020 11:15 AM  #8


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w


Bob. 69 Mach 1, 393W, SMOD Toploader, Armstrong  steering, factory AC.
 

11/01/2020 7:38 AM  #9


Re: Low profile oil pans 289/302 and 351w

Smart guys don't run the full capacity in these pans, they typically run 6 quarts total in the system.  There's two reasons for this.  First, the added capacity means you can move the oil farther away from the rotating assembly, which reduces parasitic power loss from windage and oil roping.

Second, the stock Ford small block oil pump is so good that adding more oil will just totally over oil the top end.  This can cause oil to blow out the breathers because there's so much oil up top.  The baffles in the valve covers are designed to stop splash oil and oil vapor from escaping, not liquid oil.  At 8 quarts you are very close to double the capacity of the stock pan. 

If you talk to Milodon they will tell you that the stated capacity is just that; what the pan can physically hold.  There's no reason to actually run it full, and 6 quarts is fine. 
 

 

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.