FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Finished modifying 2 GM TBIs into "Dual Quad" throttle bodies 393W » 4/10/2024 8:53 AM

Daze
Replies: 9

Go to post

Thanks guys.  When I get to the test and tune I will show snippets here first before it ever makes it to my channel.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Finished modifying 2 GM TBIs into "Dual Quad" throttle bodies 393W » 4/08/2024 1:51 PM

Daze
Replies: 9

Go to post

Greg B wrote:

Looking good! I went to your channel the other night because I noticed you hadn't posted in a while, and I see what you been up to!

I try to only post relevant videos and not spam the group with the non automotive videos.  The new mill has gotten most of my attention as of late.

Nos681 wrote:

That turned out very nice Daze.

Thanks!!
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/08/2024 10:59 AM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

RPM, aka Bearing Bob wrote:

 
Yeees...butt...I saw what you were doing, but I'm too lazy to do a two minute search. But I'll post a couple times here which takes much more time.

 😂😁😂  Sounds reasonable to me 
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/08/2024 10:09 AM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

Nos681, did you thread the strut rods yourself or did you take them to a machine shop?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/07/2024 11:45 PM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

Nos681 wrote:

Daze, you deserve an honorable mention as well.

I did read your initial write up years ago…did not see the updated clevis.

I used the same seller for the clevis, just checked your website.

No I don't need honerable mention 😁😁 Just curious if it was the same part and now we know it is.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/07/2024 11:43 PM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

RPM, aka Bearing Bob wrote:

So from whom did you get the clevis?

Doesn't anyone read my webpage any more 😂😂😂 There is a link in the updated section near the bottom of my adjustable strut rod build page

here is a direct link https://mooreparts.com/products/latest-rage-425152cv-replacement-clevis-end-for-end-load-rack-pinion
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/07/2024 12:45 PM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

Rudi wrote:

Nice job on the clevises, who made them, what grade of steel?
Much more impressive than the cast/forged items!

I updated my website with all that info
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 65/66 adjustable strut rods » 4/07/2024 10:19 AM

Daze
Replies: 19

Go to post

Looks really good.  That looks like the same steering clevis I used after my initial build with the cast clevis


https://dazecars.com/dazed/adjustable.html

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Finished modifying 2 GM TBIs into "Dual Quad" throttle bodies 393W » 4/07/2024 9:41 AM

Daze
Replies: 9

Go to post

Had so many projects in the works that this part of my Frankenstein EFI took a back seat, but I finally circled back and finsihed up these throttle boddies so that I can get them installed on the 351W on my run stand and see if this crazy concept will even work.

 


  

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 8:26 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

MS wrote:

I guess if you are going to buy one, get the biggest possible size. And if two liters is enough to submerge the part, that is enough?
And could throw some rocks in there to take up liquid volume if the part to be cleaned is small

Or some random wrenches, hammers, sockets.  To get a free cleanup on those

That was exactly my thought. Glen and I were talking about this exact thing and he is going to use bad transmission gears. I would be worried about rocks reacting with the cleaning liquid.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 7:33 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

MS wrote:

What size is yours, Daze?  The 15L version would cost as much as a new carb to fill it with Pine-Sol!

15l. On sale fore $170 if you have Amazon prime and then there is a 5% coupon code knocking another 8 bucks off. I paid 139 when I got mine but that was between Thanksgiving and Christmas.  Not cheap but for me the time savings it paid for itself with these two throttle bodies.   Besides “money you enjoy wasting… “

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 6:11 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

RPM, aka Bearing Bob wrote:

6sally6 wrote:

"Awesome" (the name of a cleaner available at Dollar Tree ! BTW)
Funny story......
When I was on submarines, back in my Navy days, I was a cook. The double griddle we used was cast iron and even when it was scrubbed with greenie pads it never really looked super clean.
One day when I was cleaning the galley I took a package of concentrated  Kool-Aid (aka as bug juice! One packet made 10 gallons of bug juice.)
I mixed about a pint of water with a packet of the lime bug juice (NOBODY liked the lime so we had PLENTY). I put the super concentrate on the cool griddle and gently wiped it with a greenie.
The results were.........it looked like a sheet of shiny stainless steel ! Stupid clean.
We started using the "magic concentrate" every time we cleaned the griddle.
We ordered more of the stuff and the crew used it throughout the boat on all the stainless steel surfaces! (even the inside of the stainless steel crapper bowls)                                                                                             .1. Fill the bowl almost to the top
                                                                                                                                                   2. pour in the bug juice mix
                                                                                                                                                   3. swish and flush !
                                                                                                                                                   4. shined like chrome!!
True story.....concentrated dehydrated vinegar worked almost as well.
6sally6

 
Why did you wait all these years to share this tip?

This is at least the second time I’ve heard him tell that story.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 5:11 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

Nos681 wrote:

Cool video Daze.

Flea Bay has them too.

“Creworks ultrasonic cleaner”

I’ve been considering one too.

I have been trying to avoid greedBay unless I absolutly have to.  Poor customer service and they really screw their sellers.  I at one time sold most of my product line on eBay but got to a point where I would rather not sell it at all then sell it on eBay.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 4:43 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

MS wrote:

So, where do I get one of those ultrasonic units?

Affiliate links to items in this video:

Amazon link to Ultrasonic Cleaner https://amzn.to/3HoeQLJ
Walmart link to Ultrasonic Cleaner https://walmrt.us/490SJH0

 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I took the Pine-Sol carb soak technique and made it 10X BETTER » 1/21/2024 12:34 PM

Daze
Replies: 18

Go to post

After the amazing results using Pine-Sol as a carb dip I decided to do another experiment with an Ultrasonic cleaner.  I expected it to work well, Ultrasonic cleaners are a proven way to clean parts but I didn't expect it to work this well/fast





 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/17/2024 10:43 AM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

Like I said before I only think it is critical in extreme situations.  Boost or NOS above 6000 RPM.  In those situations one degree either direction can cause detonation in an intake or to much advance in the cylinder.  Both results can be catastrophic but with a normal every day engine its not going to be an issue.  A few years back I was fighting an issue on a 351w on my run stand. Engine wasn't running poorly but I had two header tubes not getting as hot.  I was playing with EFI in self tune and it kept going rich.  Problem ended up being the 5 and 6 spark plug wires had gotten switched so one was way advanced and the other was way retarded.  Point being even though far from perfect the engine was still running okay and if a stock(ish) motor can be off by that much without major issues the one or two degrees of phasing is not going to effect it at all.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/16/2024 2:53 PM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

Daze wrote:

Rufus thanks for pointing out the difference in rotor tips.  You helped me bust the myth that ford went to a bigger cap to avoide crossfire INSIDE the cap.  

The conventional wisdom that Ford went to a bigger cap to avoid crossfire inside the cap is a myth and like all good myths it is based in a sound logical concept but I just discovered proof that it is in fact a myth. Yes the terminals are further apart and logically that would indicate less unwanted spark jumping because the spark has further to go, BUT I went out to my garage and compared the smaller cap rotor to the bigger cap rotor and the bigger cap rotor has a much bigger tip to account for it moving faster. I took the distance between the cap contacts, subtracted the width of the corresponding rotor tip width and divided by 2. The number was THE SAME. That means inside the cap, from a spark point of view there is no difference. From this information it is obvious Ford made the change to the bigger cap fore some reason OTHER than crossfire inside the cap. Not to mention that if crossfire inside the cap was an issue there would be 20 years of Internationals sitting on the side of the road.
=13px

CORRECTION I measured hastily this morning and when I came out to work, I double checked my measurements there is about a .075 inch difference in the space on either side of the rotor contact on the bigger cap from the tip of the rotor when the rotor is centered. I don’t want to put out false information so I’m retracting what I said above. Ultimately, this has worked for a lot of ignitions. It may not work for all of them. A person is just going to have to try it and possibly adjust if they’re getting crossfire.


 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/16/2024 11:30 AM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

MS wrote:

Explain what this is for, why matters?

It is my understanding that timing phasing only matter on a lock out distributor in a situation where massive timing swings need to happen to account for boost and NOS, situations where you want it retarded and even being off by a couple degrees advanced can cause catastrophic consequences.  There was a guy on VMF that wanted an adjuster to phase a Duraspark distributor that he had locked out and so yesterday I went out to the garage and invented one.  I took and old vacuum canister, chucked it up into the lathe to separate the halves, I then removed the diaphragm, added a heavy spring (I believe from drum brakes) cut the vacuum inlet off, machined a spacer to go between the adjuster that was already inside and the adjuster arm cup, drilled and tapped 4 holes and put it all together including installing a 1/4" fine thread bolt into the stock adjuster.



There is about 1/4" total adjustment which comes out to one reluctor tooth when installed in the distributor. That works out to about 8º





If I was going to install this in a car I would replace the bolt with a long setscrew with jam nut (just used what I had kicking around in the shop) and add 4 more screws to hold the halves together. Not only would they look cool but the body of the canister flexes a bit with just 4 screws.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/16/2024 11:09 AM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

Rufus thanks for pointing out the difference in rotor tips.  You helped me bust the myth that ford went to a bigger cap to avoide crossfire INSIDE the cap.  

The conventional wisdom that Ford went to a bigger cap to avoid crossfire inside the cap is a myth and like all good myths it is based in a sound logical concept but I just discovered proof that it is in fact a myth. Yes the terminals are further apart and logically that would indicate less unwanted spark jumping because the spark has further to go, BUT I went out to my garage and compared the smaller cap rotor to the bigger cap rotor and the bigger cap rotor has a much bigger tip to account for it moving faster. I took the distance between the cap contacts, subtracted the width of the corresponding rotor tip width and divided by 2. The number was THE SAME. That means inside the cap, from a spark point of view there is no difference. From this information it is obvious Ford made the change to the bigger cap fore some reason OTHER than crossfire inside the cap. Not to mention that if crossfire inside the cap was an issue there would be 20 years of Internationals sitting on the side of the road.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/15/2024 7:20 PM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

6sally6 wrote:

EZ answer would be..........Axe Greg B if he has had any crossfire situations pop up.....
6s6
 

Lot of people have commented on my video and forum posts saying they have been running this for years, no issue.  Also International used it for over 20 years so I think it is fairly sound.  One engine builder who had a lot of good incites said crossfire is very RPM dependent.  Not as much of an issue until 6000 and above.  He also said most of the crossfire he has seen has been outside the cap but it does happen inside in extreme situations and without venting.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/15/2024 1:45 PM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

TKOPerformance wrote:

So, without knowing why they made the switch its all just speculation on our part. 
 

That!! that right there, exactly my point
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/15/2024 11:02 AM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

TKOPerformance wrote:

Does the smaller cap have a vent?  I seem to recall that crossfire often was caused by ionized air inside the cap, and if you could vent it the issue resolved.  

Seams like a good theory, but I don't buy it.   The larger cap IS vented and if venting was all that was required Ford' bean counters would save $.02 per distributor on less plastic.  Yes ionized gas inside could crossfire so venting is good but I think their decision to go bigger has more to do with cheap spark plug wires and crossfire outside the cap.  If small caps were prone to misfire inside than all the MSD and other aftermarket caps would be bigger as ignitions have only gotten hotter.  Why can the aftermarket run smaller caps, because of aftermarket wires.
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best kept secrets in the classic Ford community Thanks Greg B » 1/14/2024 10:32 AM

Daze
Replies: 31

Go to post

Some of you may have seen the thread I started a few weeks back regarding using an adapter and an MSD cap to reduce the size of the TFI distributor.  I also am a fan of the Duraspak distributor but never liked its big bulbous cap.  Yes you can swap that cap out for a points type cap BUT it requires new plug wires or at the very least changing the boots on your old ones.  What I really wanted was a smaller male cap that fit on the duraspark distributor... and thanks to Greg B I have one.






 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » I made a DIY tool and saved myself $80-$300 over buying it » 1/06/2024 7:58 PM

Daze
Replies: 7

Go to post

Already made some improvements. Added a tension spring to help secure it when in use and shortened the lower strut so it doesn’t hit the connecting rod.

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.