FYI FORD - MustangSteve's Ford Mustang Forum
The Internet's Most Knowledgeable Classic Mustang Information
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CLASSIC FORD MUSTANGS, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE!
MustangSteve has over 30 years of Mustang experience, having owned 30 of them and restored several others. With the help of other Mustangers, this site is dedicated to helping anyone wanting to restore or modify their Mustang.... THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS!!!!!
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for:
FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Wheel cribs for transmission removal » 9/06/2020 10:51 PM

BradH
Replies: 24

Go to post

I am going to build a set of wheel cribs to support my 66 fastback and 5.0 Miata when I do under car projects. What do you guys think the minimum elevation should be for a project like a TKO 600 removal or a clutch replacement? If someone could give me an actual number it would be helpful. That way I can purchase some overpriced 2x4's. The stuff is out of sight right now. LOL.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Battery in the trunk » 10/13/2018 10:33 PM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

There are rules to be followed with the lithiums as well. You can't let them ever go below a certain voltage, they become very dangerous at that point. I believe they told me to never put the charger on it if it ever read less than 8 volts, and that I was to send it back to them for possible rebuilding. I also had to be sure to never allow more than 14.4 volts or thereabouts from the charging circuit so I needed to pick a proper voltage regulator. All worth it in my opinion, I could not believe how fast it spun the engine over the first time I hit the key.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Battery in the trunk » 10/13/2018 3:47 PM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

It appears that the Earthx Batteries are similar and potentially cheaper. Well worth a look.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Battery in the trunk » 10/13/2018 3:40 PM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

I purchased a Braille GU1-R battery and the recommended charger sku# 1232L. It is not one of the 16 volt units. It is a 12 volt unit. I don't see the exact one listed on their web site any more  but there are equivalent ones listed.

www.braillebattery.com/index.php/braille/product_series/green_lite
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Battery in the trunk » 10/13/2018 1:24 AM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

I'm running a Lithium battery. I was going to relocate my lead acid battery to the trunk similar to what Shelby did with the 65 GT-350 and like I did on my 68 Cougar. After considering all of the details, the weight of the welding wire, the overall weight of the battery is still there albeit it's in a different spot, and the always existing potential for a catastrophic electrical short. I decided on the lithium battery. It's not for everyone. It's very expensive, but it spins the engine over like a top with a slightly higher voltage to the starter and it allows me to keep the battery in the stock location. The battery is only a little over 6 lbs and it is the size of a garden tractor battery. I had to make some adjustments to the mounting tray to mount the smaller battery box and after having the trunk mount battery explode in my Sunbeam Tiger, I decided to make a smaller battery box and use it there as well. It only takes 5 minutes or so to switch it between the two vehicles and I always bring it inside during the winter. Something to think about, it works for me. But then my cars are toys and not daily drivers.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » AFR gauge » 9/20/2018 12:02 AM

BradH
Replies: 7

Go to post

Since I am going to be under the car fixing clutch issues I thought it would be a good time to weld in an exhaust bung.I saw reference to an analog style afr gauge and that makes good sense to me. A sweeping needle is probably better and easier to read than a constantly changing digital display. Having said that, whose gauge would you recommend? I realize that I can probably look back through forums for advise but technology changes so rapidly I thought I would ask. Thank you again.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Clutch Chatter- a point of reference please » 9/19/2018 10:43 PM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

TKO-Thanks for the information everything told has value. I went through a drive line angle problem when I first installed the 9" rear but I now believe that I have it pretty well cured. The housing needed to be shimmed up in the front to match the downward angle of the transmission, at least within a degree and a half or so. The TKO600 that is in the car was installed by the previous owner with the aid of his mechanics. It appeared to function fine with the stock 8" rear and it was only when I installed the 9" that I had problems. It would vibrate horribly at 60 mph and above. I started with 2* shims and finally ended up with 6* or so if I remember correctly. I added 2* at a time until I got the smoothest ride. I can now go over 100 without issue. I even added shims to the transmission mount to get it as high up in the tunnel as possible. The 9" housing appeared to have had the spring pads welded such that if set level the opening for the center section would be 90*. When I compared it to the 8" housing that I was removing it seemed that the 8" was pointing upwards about 4* more so I added the shims to get it close. I will be removing the transmission and bell housing to inspect the clutch and flywheel in a couple of weeks. I will also be verifying the squareness and alignment of the bellhousing. Something that I can't be sure the installers did properly. If I find damaged components they will obviously need to be replaced. The car will probably never be raced on a track. It will be a high performance street machine, basically a weekend corner carver and a toy. I've tried to build it such that it would be considered a step above what Carroll would have produced if he didn't have the bean counters at Ford to deal with. The 347 engine dynoed at 430 hp/430 torque, it will red line at 6200 rpm and as mentioned, the transmission is a TKO 600. The rear gear is a 3.89 wavetrac. What clutch and pressure plate would you recommend based on the details given? As always thank

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Clutch Chatter- a point of reference please » 9/19/2018 1:32 PM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

Thank you to all for the responses so far. I purchased my car back in 2012 with most of the modifications that I wanted supposedly done properly. Unfortunately this has not been the case. I have had to literally redo most everything on the car. In fact, I would have to think long and hard to come up with something that I haven't laid a wrench on. I think maybe the headliner was ok. This was not out of ignorance about these cars but more out of the belief that I had something that was about 80% complete and I could just drive and enjoy. I'm not looking for sympathy here just describing reality. I was hoping to get back into the hobby with a car that I could safely modify without a risk of totally devaluing it. I like to tinker and modify things so I felt that the purchase of this 66 fastback would be a logical move since the value of one of my other cars, a 67 Shelby GT350, has gone through the roof. I know that some will say that "It's your car do what you want with it" but I just felt that the mods that I wanted to make would take the Shelby too far from being original. I have a 68 Cougar that I made several suspension mods to back in the mid 70's and the handling was amazing. The Klaus Arning mod should have been done by the factory. I can't make my test with the Cougar because it is an automatic and the Shelby is now in need for a restoration itself so I am appealing to you folks. I read on one of the other forums that a certain amount of chatter seems to be normal depending on the build but I'm not convinced. This is why I was hoping that someone else might do the parking lot test that I described in the original post. As far as the components used by the previous owner, I can't say I'm kind of whistling through the graveyard on some of this. I received a large folder with paperwork with the purchase but there are a few gaps as far as components used. I built the 9" rear with a Wavetrac differential , I sent the TKO600 to Liberty's Gear, originally a Keisler Per

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Clutch Chatter- a point of reference please » 9/19/2018 1:34 AM

BradH
Replies: 12

Go to post

Ladies and Gentlemen- I have a favor to ask. I need a point of reference. If you take your standard transmission Mustang to a level parking lot and, with the engine idling, in first gear, clutch on the floor, and ever so slowly engage the clutch without feeding in more throttle does your clutch engage smoothly or does it chatter like crazy before the car starts to roll? Mine chatters like crazy such that I'm thinking my clutch has oily facings even though it doesn't seem to slip at speed or during upshifts. For comparison, and I realize that it is a completely different animal, my Miata takes off gently with no vibration whatsoever. The Mustang bucks and chatters as I roll off from a stop sign with the proper throttle applied. Just curious what other drivers are experiencing. I searched other forums and found one that was Ford related with a thread related to my question and saw quite a range of responses. Is my situation normal, I don't think so, or does it point to a bad clutch? My car is a 66 FB 347 TKO 600 9" 3.89 gears with only about 9000 miles on the rebuild. Thank you in advance.-Brad
PS-I should add that the clutch actuating mechanism has all been upgraded with roller bearing pivots and heim jointed linkages and adjusted properly with sufficient free play.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » k code choke cable routing » 9/07/2018 3:06 PM

BradH
Replies: 0

Go to post

I am looking for a photo or a description of the routing that Ford used for the choke cable on the k code 66 mustang. I'm pretty sure that my engine compartment photos are correct what I am unsure of is the path that it takes under and behind the dash. Some photos show the knob installed to the left of the parking brake handle others show the knob under and to the right of the ignition switch. I've seen comments that the relative position was sometimes left up to the assembly plant. Don't know for sure. The only thing I haven't seen is a photo or mention of how it gets from the knob and bracket to the fire wall. If anyone knows or has a picture it would be much appreciated. Thank you in advance.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Monte Carlo bar » 8/23/2018 12:42 AM

BradH
Replies: 27

Go to post

Tom,
Just out of curiosity which brand straight bar did you buy from CJ pony parts that was crap. I went ahead and ordered a Dynacorn one to try. I'm hoping you're not going to tell me that it was one of theirs. I checked out the CJ catalog and it appears that they have several available. -Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Monte Carlo bar » 8/20/2018 10:01 PM

BradH
Replies: 27

Go to post

Should have added that it is for a 66 FB.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Monte Carlo bar » 8/20/2018 10:00 PM

BradH
Replies: 27

Go to post

I would like some suggestions on monte carlo bars. Who, in your opinion, has the best quality original appearing one. I have seen some with the top holes punched for carriage bolts, that is not important in my case. I know that Scott Drake makes a reproduction but I have heard different comments as to the quality of some of their stuff.  I am looking to purchase an original straight black bar that is robust enough that Shelby himself would have used it in production. Thank you in advance.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » hydraulic lifter preload » 8/15/2018 8:20 PM

BradH
Replies: 10

Go to post

Tom, That is exactly how my engine sounds! I am told that this is normal for the profile of the cam and the associated valve hardware that I am using. I always thought that hydraulic actuated valves were quiet but that is not always the case. Your video and my engine sound like very aggressive solid lifters. I love the sound of solid lifters. I have two other vehicles with HP289's and to me that is music. Incidentally, your posts regarding home brew front end alignments are spot on. I believe that anyone competent enough to work on these cars can be taught to do their own alignment once the basic concepts are understood. I always enjoy reading your posts and that goes for a lot of the other folks out there too. Thanks again.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » hydraulic lifter preload » 8/15/2018 12:30 PM

BradH
Replies: 10

Go to post

Tom---The engine is a 347 with Dart Pro 1 heads. Cam is 224/230 @ .050, .556/.513 lift hydraulic. Crower roller rockers. Most suggestions seem to be either 3/4 turn past zero lash or 1/2 turn past zero lash. I believe that the engine builder set them to 1/4 turn if I read his notes correctly. That was 10 years ago, I was attempting to get rid of some perceived valve train noise. I've got them set at 3/4 now and was just wondering what you folks are doing before I button things up. I called Comp Cams this morning and their tech told me that 3/4 turn preload would be fine. 6sally6 uses 1/2 turn. I had already set them to 3/4 when I posted, the confusion for me was after I realized that I had the paper work with the engine and the engine builder set them to 1/4 turn. I haven't fired it up to test yet-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » hydraulic lifter preload » 8/14/2018 2:13 PM

BradH
Replies: 10

Go to post

I've heard of 1/2 turn and 3/4 turn past zero lash. Any performance differences between the two settings? Thank you in advance.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Tail pipe clamp on O2 sensor for temporary testing » 6/12/2018 1:22 PM

BradH
Replies: 5

Go to post

I fully agree with all responses. I happened on to this accessory and wondered if it might work. I hope the picture comes through. Years ago I had a "Exhaust Gas Analyzer" that Sears sold where you would stick a sensor up the tail pipe. It sort of worked but the readings lagged horribly. -Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Tail pipe clamp on O2 sensor for temporary testing » 6/11/2018 11:32 PM

BradH
Replies: 5

Go to post

 I'm debating using a afr gauge for carb tuning. Does anyone have any experience with a tail pipe clamp on oxygen sensor? What I would like to do is use the gauge on several vehicles and not make a permanent installation. Tune the carb then transfer the equipment to the next car and do the same. Is it reasonably accurate or is it too much of a compromise?-Brad
 

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Tracking down a vibration problem » 12/06/2017 8:17 PM

BradH
Replies: 9

Go to post

Gary,
The front mounts are stock Ford with the bolts that I had placed through the one on the drivers side backed way off. We had discussed the fact that I had pinned that mount and you suggested that I remove the bolts, I backed them way off figuring that might be enough for the test. It was a lot easier than pulling the mount completely off and removing the bolts. The passenger side mount has not been modified. As for the transmission, I believe it is a stock Ford rubber mount. The crossmember is one that Keisler provided with their "Perfect fit kit" for installation of the TKO-600 transmission into the 66 Mustang. All parts are new or almost new. -Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Tracking down a vibration problem » 12/05/2017 2:56 PM

BradH
Replies: 9

Go to post

Gary,
Thank you again for your help with this matter. The car is put away for the winter now so it will be spring before I get a chance to proceed with the troubleshooting. You did not mention the dash readings. Did they provide any useful information? -Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Driveline/engine vibration a question for MS and anyone else » 9/09/2017 2:54 PM

BradH
Replies: 13

Go to post

Gary,I am waiting for the machine shop to finish checking my cast pulley and harmonic balancer. I am prepared to replace the balancer based on what I have read regardless of their results. What brand/type are you using on your 347?When I get the engine back together and the car off the stands I will do the road tests and report the findings. I am greatly appreciative of your time and knowledge and am fascinated with the physics behind this. Feel free to go into whatever depth you wish on this issue, it is a great read.-Brad

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Driveline/engine vibration a question for MS and anyone else » 9/08/2017 6:20 PM

BradH
Replies: 13

Go to post

Al-I believe that I have been dealing with 2 separate issues that overlapped at the same approximate rpm. When I took the car up to 70 plus and depressed the clutch the car smoothed out. Was this due to the engine returning to idle,  or did it smooth out because I finally hit the correct pinion angle with my shims, or was it a combination of both? My desire to correct the tailshaft angle was directly related to the postings that I have read and the common sense of matching the factory angles. If I indeed need to remove the transmission in order to check my clutch and pressure plate for balance it seems logical that this would be the time to raise the tunnel in order to get the transmission up higher in the chassis. The real question is whether attaining this "perfect angle" is really even necessary. My angle now is a bit less than 4*and might actually be closer to 3*.I do however know that with the transmission in neutral and the car sitting still I do get a vibration that does not seem to change with the clutch in or out. The vibration that I'm now describing is either engine related or a resonance issue. MS stated that he has changed almost everything on his car multiple times without a solution.  I have now removed the balancer and front pulley and have taken them into a shop to have them checked. I have also noticed that the vibration seems to lessen with the front(air conditioning) belt removed. This belt drives only the compressor through a single idler. This occurs even without the ac running. The crank pulley is an older style cast pulley that is a little over 2 pounds heavier than the stamped welded version. I am hoping that the machine shop tells me that it is slightly out of balance. I did run the engine momentarily without any drive belts connected and it still vibrated. The vibration occurs from about 4000 to 5400 or so with it apparently smoothing out above that speed. I purchased this car back in 2012 about 80% restored, or at least I thought it was.

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Driveline/engine vibration a question for MS and anyone else » 9/07/2017 7:52 PM

BradH
Replies: 13

Go to post

All very good points. The transmission was raised up as much as it will go because of the belief that the TKO600 is a taller transmission and we are trying to fit it into the space that a toploader would go. The tunnel on the 66 is not as accommodating as the later models. When I installed the 9" rear I noticed the vibration. Now if you made me put my hand on a Bible and swear that it wasn't there with the 8",I can't say 100%.When I purchased the car it came with the 347 and the TKO600 already installed as per Keisler's instructions. I was able to get it up in the tunnel a bit more. After further modification to the Keisler template it is now as far up into the stock tunnel as it can go without hitting the chassis. The transmission itself is a Keisler modified unit that has had some of the top section machined off. I believe that it was called a "Perfect Fit" kit. When I started with this the tailshaft angle was somewhere in the neighborhood of 4* or so. Maybe it isn't as big a concern, I have seen posts where people describe 5 and 6 degree angles and don't complain about vibration. I reasoned that if a person could duplicate the factory angles there shouldn't be a problem. Does anyone know the dimensional differences between the toploader and the TKO600?

FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Driveline/engine vibration a question for MS and anyone else » 9/07/2017 4:23 PM

BradH
Replies: 13

Go to post

Yes, the vibration occurs with the car in neutral sitting still. You have an interesting thought about the flexible exhaust behind the collectors. I am drifting away from the concept of hacking up the tunnel. After reading that you've tried a range of greater than 3* down to 1* with no apparent effect it makes me wonder if it would be worth the effort. The fact that I can take her up to 70 and depress the clutch and the vibration goes away reaffirms, at least in my mind, that it is not driveline related. Do you know if there is anything about the 347 that would make it more likely to be  vibration prone than any of the other Ford engines? It would help if I were a little better at determining whether the vibration is mechanical or a resonance issue.

Board footera


REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on.