| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » For those passionate about the electric vs mechanical coolant fan... » 5/15/2014 1:53 PM |
I moved from a stock radiator and flex fan with homemade shroud to a 5 row all aluminum radiator and it knocked down my running temp on hot Houston days to the 190s (IIRC). I didn't see any improvement when I moved to the electric fan. In fact I don't care for the additional noise so I may move back.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Finally... After 10 years... » 5/15/2014 1:49 PM |
Getting started is a great feeling. Don't let the daunting task get to you. If you start to get burned out, take a break, recharge and get back at it when you can. My '65 sat undriveable for about 30 months when we did the body work, paint, floor pans, doors, etc. Other projects ranged from a few days to a few months. Firing it up for the first time makes it all worth while.
Good luck!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » hit my goal!!! » 3/14/2014 12:51 PM |
Congratulations! Nice lookin' ride!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Who has a good looking overflow jug set-up? » 3/13/2014 7:55 AM |
MustangSteve wrote:
Typically the radiators that puke out coolant are overfilled. Correct level is 1" BELOW the bottom of the filler neck. Any more than that and it will self-correct until it reaches that level, the it will stop. The tank does not add to the cooling effect that takes place in the finned tubes. It just needs to have enough water in it to reach all the tubes.
You can say I am wrong if you want, but they did not have overflow tanks from the factory. I'm not saying I am not for improvements whenever possible. Just saying that I have never had one overflow when filled to the proper level, no matter what the temperature was outside or how long I idled in traffic. A 13 # cap like was originally installed is a must for proper water retention.
If it makes you feel more secure to have an overflow tank, by all means install one. But an overflow tank will not keep an engine with an overheating problem from overheating.
And, if you run in sanctioned drag racing, I believe one is an absolute requirement according to their rules.
I didn't know that . I always filled up around to the 1/2" below or a little higher. If I ever made it up to the collar level I'd expect a little overflow. It was an adjustment moving from the stock to the four row though. I've had to burp the newer one more than once even after letting it cycle. I love it though, cools great.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Installing a TACH / oil pressure sensor / temp gauge. » 3/12/2014 1:39 PM |
Gaba wrote:
would it be a good idea to use the fuse box for power supply?
I used the same power supply that I ran for my radio head unit. Pretty sure I split it off from the ignition and fused it.
You can get brass fittings for your stock oil sending unit that will accept the pressure sensor tube fitting. They're fairly common.
And if they're functional I say go with it. I bought a cheapo triple cluster for like $25 like six years ago. I now have a nicer Jegs set sitting in a cabinet in my garage that I keep wanting to put in, but the cheap one works so darn well that I can't justify the time spent to replace it!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Who has a good looking overflow jug set-up? » 3/12/2014 1:34 PM |
boomyal wrote:
MustangSteve wrote:
....I can honestly say I have never understood the need for an overflow tank on a SBF. ~~~~~ I will even forego ANY PROFIT at all since I really believe they are a waste of time.
Not sure how you can make such statements as this forum and others are full of posts about stock early V8's running warm/hot. Mine in particular is a dead stock 289 2bbl with a stock dimension upgraded 3 row radiator running a shrouded 7 blade flex fan. Running at parade speeds, in 60ish° weather, it would always run warmish then puke coolant once I shut it down. This is all on a low mileage factory long block with no possibility of compromised coolant passages.
Once I installed the 3 x 10" tubular recovery system, it no longer blew out coolant on shut down.
My stock rad setup with a flex fan (no shroud) spit up coolant in traffic during summer time in Houston. I moved to a four core all aluminum radiator with a home made shroud and it hasn't been an issue since. I already had the recovery bottle though.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/14/2014 1:26 PM |
MustangSteve wrote:
Just an observation...
The 2 bolts on each side that exist to bolt the monte carlo bar on will put dents in the bottom of your hood. You might want to take them out and file the holes square, then insert smooth carriage bolts from the top. Then you can tighten the nut below without having to put a wrench on the top.
I have seen way too many 65/66 hoods with the two dents on each side from those bolt heads.
I think they clear OK but I'll double check when I get back. If they're hitting then the damage is already done . I know it doesn't show on the top side of the hood so it that's the extend of the ding I'm fine with it. Hell I already have a nice little divot from the air clear nut. ZERO clearance there. I can't even use a wing nut.
Thanks for the heads up, Steve!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/13/2014 2:59 PM |
So we got it fired up yesterday after a little fuel/spark excitement. The new carb hadn't been tightened up properly and the power wire to the distributor had come apart at a connecter. It sounded great in the garage. Crazy acoustics with the front end facing out, but not great for fumes blasting around near the door to the house. Even with the side garage door open it was a little overpowering.
However, for some reason the secondary boosters on the carb aren't squirting. Pretty sure the bowl is filling up and the accel pump is getting a good seal. It's a lot of pressure like it's trying but no dice. I'll pull it apart tonight to check the metering block for the wrong gasket or some blockage. That's all that's keeping me from a test drive!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Someone remind me why I have Headers on this car... » 2/13/2014 2:52 PM |
MustangSteve wrote:
It was fantastic installing the JBA shorties that replaced the Hedmans on my 66. I can almost get a socket on every bolt. And there is nothing blocked from access to plugs. I cannot imagine what Hedman was thinking with the 7-8 kickup tube.
It is neat to be able to create a special tool for a specific job, though. I have a small wrench with the open end at 90 degrees to the handle to tighten that bolt.
Imagine your heirs going through your stuff someday. "What the heck is THAT?"
I couldn't agree more with this. I went from full length Hookers to shorty JBAs after talking to Steve and I couldn't be happier. I can get those things on and off in about 20 minutes now. And they are actually a little deeper and louder than the Hookers. 1000% better. I should have done it a decade ago.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/11/2014 12:00 PM |
I picked up the motor from the machine shop and dropped it in the car on Saturday. If we hadn't misplaced that oil sending fitting we could have started it up . I found the fitting so as soon as it's a little warmer in the garage I'll get it test fired.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/07/2014 11:22 PM |
6sally6 wrote:
Don't forget to get that cam degree'd! Just stick'en it in"dot-to-dot" is worng in so many ways. While degreing it you may want to advance it 4/6 degrees. Move that power range down (about 1000rpm) .Make the power in the low to mid-range instead of 6000+rpm. Just my thoughts.
I'm betting closer to 500hp than 450hp. 347 seems to be the "magic size" for SBF's.
Like 383' are to GM's.
Bet that 108* LSA will sound mighty sweet too!
6sal6
I'm almost certain it was degreed for a little more driveability. At least that was the plan. I'm picking it up tomorrow so I should have the full build sheet. This is the first time I've not done the installs/bolt ons myself so I'm a little uninformed!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/07/2014 11:21 PM |
DBROWN wrote:
That is a big cam, and with porting the heads,he may be right.
Why did you have to have the valve springs upgraded with a .499 lift? I just put together a motor with trick fllow heads and my cam has like .530 to .540 lift, trick flow list the stock springs as capable of .600 lift. I figured I would be good with the out of the box springs on trick flow twisted wedge 170 heads. I ask because I want to make sure I am good on my springs.
Pretty sure it was a pressure thing not a clearance thing. The stock ones were too light (if that's the correct term?). From the way it was explained to me that aggressive cam required more seat pressure.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » bellhousings » 2/07/2014 1:53 PM |
Hmm. I just did this switch so I should remember... Aren't all the T5s setup for "pull" forks while the four speeds were "push"? I honestly don't know. If that's true though the fork would probably be at least a few inches different. I'm curious now too.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/07/2014 10:25 AM |
DBROWN wrote:
My Guess, it will make 450+ flywheel HP, But may be a tad under 400 rwh.
That's exactly what I was thinking. But my mechanic friend predicts well over 500 at the flywheel, 400+ at the wheels. He's got about 35 years experience on me and is a Mustang guy so I'm hoping I lose this bet. I guess either way I really win though!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best way to lower front suspension on 66 mustang V8-289 » 2/07/2014 10:21 AM |
True74yamaha wrote:
You may want to pull an explorer rear end and shorten for your car. That way you'll even have disc brakes in the rear end and a pretty strong one two
+1 to this too! I just did that swap at the end of last summer. Love the discs and the 31 spline axles. E-Brake is going to be a pain though.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Best way to lower front suspension on 66 mustang V8-289 » 2/07/2014 8:27 AM |
+1 to the Shelby drop suggestion. I did that and added the 1" sway bar and it's a massive difference.
Of course that could be mostly the bar, but hey
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 2/07/2014 8:24 AM |
Well, per normal things took a slight detour. The valve springs on my TrickFlow heads were a little too light for the cam in the new motor. So I had to spend the money I was saving for the engine dyno on new springs and hardware. Also the heads had some remarkably bad corrosion in the water ports. My only thought is that I mixed the antifreze with tap water at my old house and we had REALLY hard water there. Those heads probably only have 10-15k miles on them. So we had them welded up and re-ported.
Aside from that things are going well. I don't have the bore/stroke specs in front of me but I think the block is .30 over with a 3.4 stroke? Block is studded and girdled. I'll post a pic of the cams specs. We've used it in another street car so it's streetable even though it looks a little extreme. All the internals are forged. Mahle pistons setup for the twisted wedge heads, Scat rods, Eagle crank. Canton oil pan. Vic Jr. Intake. And I picked up a 750 4150 Holley DP with annular boosters. I can't remember if I posted about that but I had no idea what an annular booster was, so I did a bit of reading. Pretty interesting stuff.
It should be all buttoned up by the end of the weekend. I'm trying to change out my steering box while I have the other motor out but if all goes well we'll be running by the end of next week! I have a bet with my mechanic buddy on the RWHP of this setup. I was hoping for 400-450 at the flywheel but since we're not going to engine dyno we agreed on rear wheel. He swears it will make over 400. I'm not so sure. We bet a case of beer
Pics:
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 1/24/2014 6:29 PM |
Oh I'll be there to "help" if we do the engine dyno . I wouldn't spend that money and just let someone else have all the fun! I was hoping to learn a bit too.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 1/23/2014 6:01 PM |
WC T5 and the Explorer rear end swap. 31 spline axles, posi trac, discs, etc. I'll get all the motor specs this week. I went over them with the builder but I didn't write it down .
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 347 build update » 1/23/2014 9:18 AM |
Greetings all! I hope everyone had a safe and happy holiday and new year! I took a break from all things car related for the holiday season but the warmer weather here in Houston has kicked me back into gear. I think I got to drive the '65 for maybe five weeks before I'm back into tear down mode .
Back in December I did stumble across a machine shop that had a stroker block w/girdle and studs all ready for rotatiting assembly. The builder is local and has a good rep so I went ahead and started up on the project. He ordered me a forged rotating assembly to match my twisted wedge heads and I've been pulling apart the top end of my current motor to clean up the parts that will be reused. Heads, Vic. Jr. intake, distributor are making the cut but I needed a new oil pan, carb and a few other fixings. Side note: I now know the difference between annular and downleg boosters. Ya learn something every day!
The rotating assembly should be balanced this week and hopefully we'll get it completely assembled by the end of next week. The builder offered to engine dyno test/tune it with me so I'm seriously considering it. I've never done an engine dyno but it seems like a much more efficient way to tune.
I'll get some pictures the next time I'm at the shop, and a whole slew more when we drop the motor in. Looking forward to making some nice power and finally removing the cardboard boxes from my garage floor to catch the oil drips from my old motor.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Dinner with the gang this evening at GMB&G » 12/31/2013 11:14 AM |
josh-kebob wrote:
I'll have to wait to dine at GMB&G........in the meantime, mrs jkb took me out tonight for some fine Geman Cuisine to celebrate......
Was the place in Pearland? They've got a killer one over there in King's Beirgarten.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Hey MS and TEXAS boyz...... » 12/30/2013 2:14 PM |
I'd probably be up for driving up to Dallas, staying the night and making the trip up to OK. Assuming nothing goes wrong with the stroker swap next month and I get that rear wobbly axle sorted out . Definitely keep this thread going.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Dinner with the gang this evening at GMB&G » 12/30/2013 2:11 PM |
Steve69 wrote:
Awesome! Love that Show! Even if they forget to put a Headliner in every once in awhile...LOL
I've noticed that too. I wonder if Sue does that work or if it's in house?
The wife and I plan on driving the '65 up there the next time we visit her parents so we can make a stop in.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Aluminum flywheel and JBA shorty header findings » 12/18/2013 7:58 AM |
GPatrick wrote:
What is the part number for the headers you ended up with?
I think it was the 1650SJS. I got the silver ceramic coated ones.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Aluminum flywheel and JBA shorty header findings » 12/18/2013 7:53 AM |
6sally6 wrote:
JVince wrote:
6sally6, I picked up a 2000 Explorer rear end with brakes for $200 at a junk yard. It's the 31 spline beefy version of the 8.8 but it's offset, so we cut 3" out of the longer side and ran two short side axles. Another $250 or so for the Ford posi unit and we had a nice little rear end. That swap seems to be getting popular as the fox body rears get harder to find.
*EDIT* You also have to cut off and reweld the spring perches to the proper location.I meant the Alum. FLYWHEEL!
Cost and where you purchased it.
6s6
Sorry. Yea, there's a novel length thread about that ridiculous flywheel mess. I ended up getting the aluminum one for the cost of a billet steel one. Local Ford Racing dealer, misboxed.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |