| ||
Visit MustangSteve's web site to view some of my work and find details for: FYIFORD Contributors' PICTURES - Power Brake Retrofit Kits for 65-66 Stangs - Classic Mustang FAQ's by MustangSteve - How to wire in a Duraspark Ignition - Mustang Ride Height Pictures and Descriptions - Steel Bushings to fit Granada Spindles to Mustang Tie Rods - Visit my EBAY store MustangSteve Performance - How to Install Granada Disc Brakes MustangSteve's Disc Brake Swap Page - FYIFORD Acronyms for guide to all the acronyms used on this page - FYIFORD Important information and upcoming events |
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY..... » Today 6:13 AM |
Here's hoping you all have a great celebration of the most important day our in our nation's history.
Bullet Bob
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Car went in for paint Friday (3/14) » Yesterday 7:33 PM |
Looks like they are doing it right, John. See what you mean about those backup light holes. Ah....nice work.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » falcon vs mustang, and gtp40 spark plug » 6/28/2025 6:09 AM |
Having been involved in putting a '96ish Exploder 5.0/gt40P heads and 89-93 EEC-IV EFI in a 64 Falcon Vert, I can sat that the frame rails are narrower on the Falcon, but the engine bay seems to be a bit longer (ft to rr). We were going to use HIPO manifolds but there was just no way to make them work. Steering box was in the way also, as I recall. Also, being a convertible, working out dual exhaust that wasn't hanging too low was more than the owner wanted to deal with. Ended up using the stock 260 exh manifolds, cross-over, single exhaust. It runs fine and gets very good mileage, so the single exh didn't seem to bother the engine setup.
If you have a 302 in there now, the 5.0 should be a drop-in. And the present exh system, I believe, will mount to the gt40p heads with minimum foolishness. Like I said, we got em mounted with the stock 260 manifolds .
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Possible 351C Boss engine find » 6/27/2025 7:32 AM |
In 1964 I bought a 1935 Pontiac with 52K original miles from the original owner. I had heard about the car from someone and kicked around driving into the bowels of Los Angeles to check it out. Finally I decided to follow it up and a friend and I went.
I bought the car for $40 and got a set of "56 Calif. license plates still in the envelope with the paper between the two plates and a box of spare parts that the owner had bought at the start of WWII because she knew parts would be hard to get....just in case. Drove that car for about two years. Great car. Still wish I had kept it.
You just never know.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Dixon had bad luck » 6/25/2025 7:55 AM |
MAW wrote:
Sorry, I didn't think about rims not fitting, that never entered my mind. I was just wondering why everyone would sit around for hours when someone could just loan him a spare to move on. But, a spare is a must have item on a long cruise.
The spare in the Heap is number 5 of the same wheels that are on the ground. I have the same problem with stock wheels not clearing the brakes so that seemed like a solid solution. Yes, it takes up a lot of trunk space but, we are only two when we travel in that car. The kids are all growed up. No pet either so Jean has what's left of the trunk plus most of the back seat for "essentials". I can usually find room to stuff in a small duffel for my needs.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Fourth water pump in my 69 » 6/25/2025 7:35 AM |
Crown Vic, etc. "Standard" 5.0 front dress puts the AC comp on the passenger side. My simple mods to that system clean it up and raise the AC comp and tuck it in tighter. Your AC comp. will not need to be moved....And, you'll have a system that is rock solid and uses stock Ford parts except for a couple of minor pieces to mod the system the way I have.
Or, you can unload a bitchin' car at reduced price because you maybe, just maybe, went down a skunk trail. Keep the car, MS, it's totally neat. Grit your teeth and fix tha damned thing right and get rid of that fancy crap that was never designed to be on a "driver" anyway. Follow your own teaching, namely, the factory spent millions designing parts that will last 200,000 miles or more. They may not be showie, but for a driver they work pretty well, and parts are available most places, if needed.
JUST SAYIN!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Lug Wrench....someone posted a while back » 6/20/2025 7:17 AM |
BILLY WALTON from GEORGIA wrote:
Bullet Bob wrote:
The lugs on the Cargar Vintage wheels on the Heap go a coupla tight spots and I just use a 3/8 drive socket adapted to my 1/2 drive breaker bar. Also got one in the trunk tool kit.
I seen where they sell a tool looks like a breaker bar has a bend in it for this very reason.
Yes. I forgot about that, but a friend gave me one years ago and it's in the trunk also. And, the socket with it is thin enough that it clears the lug nuts, as I recall. I'll try to get a pic of it for you sometime today....maybe.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Lug Wrench....someone posted a while back » 6/18/2025 2:51 PM |
The lugs on the Cargar Vintage wheels on the Heap go a coupla tight spots and I just use a 3/8 drive socket adapted to my 1/2 drive breaker bar. Also got one in the trunk tool kit.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » i am back again - this time with more projects! :) » 6/18/2025 6:23 AM |
Welcome back, Gaba. People just don't appreciate just how good a man has to be to put family before his Mustang. LOL. Honestly though, I'm glad you got all that worked out a bit and can have a little fun on the car. Hope to see you soon.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Thermostat installation on a 289-V8 » 6/17/2025 8:28 AM |
That's a nice water neck but I can see why it would be a PIA. Mine is old skool with a plane flat gasket. I always just use the gasket and a little goop to hold the stat in the recess while installing. But I do like that O-ringed neck.
Cool idea, thanks for passing that along.
BB1
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Fourth water pump in my 69 » 6/15/2025 6:39 AM |
TKOPerformance wrote:
Another option over v-belts is to go to the Fox serpentine system. The parts are easy to find on eBay used if you don't want to take a chance with the reproductions which are also available.
Gee MS, where have I heard that sentiment before?
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Wagner PCV installed » 6/12/2025 7:03 PM |
Mochaman wrote:
Mine is still collection dust on my workbench. Saving the oil right now on the wooden top of the bench.
Ya think it might cure the "auto shut-down" feature on the Heap? Might have to try it...if I can find it.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » You are invited to a Mini Bash in Belton, Tx June 20 » 6/12/2025 6:59 PM |
MS wrote:
I never promised you a rose garden.
Our room in Tucumcari was pretty good. The one at the Wimberley Bash was a definite roach hotel.
Jean and I had the honeymoon "Sweet" in Wimberley, so we were pretty comfortable. I mean, it even had three wall receptacles.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Rear bumper » 6/08/2025 7:24 AM |
Prices are certainly something to consider, Walt, butt (TS&T), I have looked at and even bought repop bumpers during the rebuild on the Heap. The quality of the chrome and even the shape was so poor that I just sent them back and went to rechrome. A good shop will do a quality job that will last for years with care and that you won't hate from the minute you install it....just sayin'.
Back in '15 I used New Age Plating in Houston, TX. 832-598-2769. Don't know if they are still in biz but I've been very happy with the work, and it still looks great.
Say "Hey" to Brenda for us.
BB1
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » How can I tell if I have a bad fuel pump » 6/07/2025 6:04 AM |
TKOPerformance wrote:
Well that part's good then, but you are still stuck with 35 gallons of gas in the tank you have to get out, and then drop the tank. If you have the facilities another option is to pull the bed, or get it raised off the frame enough to work on the tank.
That may be, Tom, 'cause I don't know the 2000 F250, but on my '97 F150 I just unbolted the bed and slid it back about 2 feet. Then changed the pump from the top of the tank. Way easier than it sounds.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » What transmission? » 5/29/2025 8:04 AM |
I rebuilt the AOD from the 89 Lincoln donor car in 07 and drove it 40K miles in the 66. Yeah, the AOD is a strange duck but it worked well for a "driver", as opposed to a "racer". I used the stock 66 shifter by playing with the lower lever to get the "travel" to match the AOD and it worked well. I have HI-PO manifolds and had to custom build the H-pipe to get around the transmission. Also, you need to buy or fab a new trans mount that is a couple of inches to the rear of stock. Parking brake mods are also required and a custom drive shaft is also likely due to length and U-joint size.
In late '23 I rebuilt and installed an '03 4R70W with a Bauman controller. Used my modified 66 shifter with a 67 bezel and further modified gate stops. Wiring changes as the 4R requires way more wiring than the AOD. The 4R is a far superior unit with lower 1st and 2nd gearing (hence the W, for Wide Ratio), it is a true lock-up trans as opposed to the AOD which is, well, different and I won't go into why here. The biggest issue I have had with the 4R (approx. 10K miles) is getting the Bauman controller tuned to my liking. It's easy to change the tune with their softwear if you are semi computer literate...I like that and the ability to change it on the fly with someone else driving. I have the "Quick 2" controller which has less tuning ability but is just fine for a "Driver" but not a "racer". If you go with the 4R you need to stay with a 98 to 03 from a 3.8 V6 (I think). Ford dumped the output shaft speedo drive gear sometime in 03 so you may need to go to an electronic speedo . Mine is an 03 but it has the drive gear to I was able to keep my EFI Vss and mechanical speedo (thanks Barry for noticing that). You will also probably want use an AODE (in be tweener trans) pan and filter as most of the 4R pans have a lower "sump" for the filter and it eats about an inch and a half of road clearance....not good!
If you go either way you can shoot me a pm and
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Original Borgison PS conversion » 5/26/2025 2:40 PM |
Chris,
Bought my first one in '13 and put it on the road in '15. About five years ago it developed a sector seal leak and I sent it back for a re-seal. It worked ok for a year or two and then developed an input shaft seal leak. It also seemed to have more slop on center than before after they re-sealed it.
I installed the latest version after the Bash last year and so far it is great. Feels way better than the old one and no leaks.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 71 Torino side mirrors » 5/22/2025 10:35 AM |
BobE wrote:
BB – I remember when you posted pictures of the mirrors you modified, great job. It is no wonder that people do not recognize that they aren’t OEM, or store-bought units.
Thanks Bob, that was a long time, and many miles ago.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 71 Torino side mirrors » 5/22/2025 6:57 AM |
RTM wrote:
Those don't look to bad. I'm trying to avoid any options other than manual adjustments.
These are electric, Bob, butt (TS&T) you can adjust them manually. Like all electric mirrors they will move on both axis when you push on them, and they stay put. Installing them like I have is a bit of work since you need to shape the plastic housing to fit the top of the door and then you need to fabricate a custom mount to bolt it down. With what I see of your skills, no problem. I'm surprised by how few people even seem to have noticed them over the last ten years.
Your car is looking really fine, Bob. Good luck, hope to meet you one day.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » 71 Torino side mirrors » 5/21/2025 8:11 PM |
TKOPerformance wrote:
RTM wrote:
I like these but to pricey.
Yeah, they look good, but that guy must be smoking something far stronger than anything I ever touched.
If you like those "Modular Aero" mirrors you might like these. some do...some don't. I saw them years ago on Glens 65 5.0 and Billy Walton's coupe, thought they had promise but didn't like the way they mounted. I modified the mount to set on "top" of the door instead of hanging off the side. That tucked them in about two inches and allowed them to be mounted square to the world instead of hanging down slightly. They are electric and the switch mounts on the driver's door in the exact same spot the original remote mirror control went. I put them on cause I thought Jean would drive the car and she didn't like the stock mirrors...too small. After 10 years she still doesn't drive the car but I am very happy with the mirrors. They are mounted back just far enough to allow the vent window to clear and if I had it to do again, I would mount them back just a tad more to allow a better angle for my eyes. As is, I run out of "out" adjustment on the driver's side. They came from 89-90ish Escort GT and the Fox Verts used similar.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Disappointing local car show » 5/20/2025 6:25 AM |
50vert wrote:
rpm wrote:
6sally6 wrote:
We park Mustangs at our church during Mustang Week here at the beach. (It's a major Mustang deal!)
We have room for roughly 200 cars.
A couple of "establishments" have events(burnout pit...live music and such) and we park some of the overflow..
The 3 nights we parked Mustangs there were a total of....'wait-for-it'...3 classics ! (4 if you count mine!![]()
Mine sounded the best !!...All the rest had that buzzy rice-burner OHC whirrr! Sure there were a bunch of turbos and coyotes butt they didn't sound like real Mercuh arn ! (Rant over!)
So get use to it fellas the real Mustangs are driven mostly by old guys who get out less & less.....
6sal6
Hail Mike, I saw more classics than that driving down to San Diego Saturday, and it got wet half of the trip. True story.Hey Bob, If you've never been, stop in Carlsbad on the way, for a visit to the Joe Martin museum.
It's a real eye opener!
Next time, Barry, we'll leave the girls home and spend the day...really get to see it. LOL
Hope Leonie and you are well. Hows the 67 coming along? Will we see you in Sept?
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » P head and HiPo exhaust manifolds » 5/17/2025 1:36 PM |
Nos681 wrote:
Greg, thanks for sharing this information.
I really appreciate it.
Bullet, I thought you had said they were modified.
Mostly on side bumping into Falcon shock tower.
Ya know, I can't recall if we had to grind to clear the towers or not. I do know we worked 'em over pretty good to get spark plug clearance.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » P head and HiPo exhaust manifolds » 5/17/2025 6:25 AM |
Dan;
Yes, the manifolds that Josh had came from my Falcon buddy. We modified them for "P" heads but later decided that dual exhaust on the 64 Falcon convertible was just not worth the effort. At that point my friend went back to the stock Falcon single exhaust setup with stock 260 manifolds, so Josh got the Hi-Po's.
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Montana 500-ford, but not mustang » 5/15/2025 7:53 PM |
Good luck, that sounds like a HOOT!
FYI Ford, Classic Mustang Tech Discussion » Hey yall!! » 4/27/2025 6:27 AM |
Not real lately but just after Thanksgiving I installed the Viking coil-overs, a new Borgeson steering box, and a new Standard Part ignition switch. Since the first of the year I've racked up about 1100 miles on the Heap and I think I will be happy with those mods. The coil-overs are significantly less harsh than the old Grab-A-Track 620 springs that I had, and I was able to adjust the front up 1/2" which, combined with 1/2 degree of positive camber, I hope will eliminate a tendency for the right tire to rub a bit.
The new Borg box is one of their latest as opposed to one based on the Trooper box that I bought back in 2014. Unlike the old one, the new one doesn't leak (so far), and has a much "tighter" feel on center whereas the old one tended to be loose, and it had been back to Borg to fix a sector leak and now had a input shaft leak.
As I said, I've been putting on the miles as I can and it appears that the new ignition switch has fixed the "Auto-Shut-Down" feature the car had developed on the Bash trip last year. Actually, it developed that feature some time ago and I kept replacing likely culprits and due to the randomness of the problem, kept thinking I had fixed it...butt (TS&T) had not. So I'll say that it's fixed.....so far!
Hope to see ya'all in Texas come September.
Oh, and I also fixed a small coolant leak that I've been fighting that seems to be part of a built-in issue with the AFR heads. Won't go into details here but it's on-going and I fix it for a year or so by the addition of five or six heaping tablespoons of black pepper to the radiator....NOT POWDER, though there have been moments when it was considered.
REMEMBER!!! When posting a question about your Mustang or other Ford on this forum, BE SURE to tell us what it is, what year, engine, etc so we have enough information to go on. |